Computer Aided Call for Tenders: A Tool for Software Bidding


Under a broad comprehension of Software Engineering, it is preferred the term software life cycle instead of just software production. The reason is that cycle starts at software conception and stops when the software is relegated. Given contemporary companies’ market strategies of focusing on their competitive advantages, most of them have externalized their software production to outsourced services. Therefore, the call for software tenders has become a common step in the software life cycle. In this paper, we present a tool which aids non-experts to specify call for software tenders. The motivation was Chile situation of most of rural and semi-urban city halls which do not have engineering teams to build call for software tenders. We describe the problem in terms of lack of competitiveness and empty biddings generated by low quality calls for tenders. As a second step, we show the technical considerations to develop the proposed tool and its features. We include an initial tool perception from a first group of users.

Share and Cite:

Hochstetter, J. and Cares, C. (2014) Computer Aided Call for Tenders: A Tool for Software Bidding. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 7, 592-601. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2014.77055.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] McIvor, R. (2010) Global Services Outsourcing. Cambrigde University Press, Cambrigde.
[2] Anda, B.C.D., Sjoberg, D.I.K. and Mockus, A. (2009) Variability and Reproducibility in Software Engineering: A Study of Four Companies that Developed the Same System. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 35, 407-429.
[3] Reyes, M., Llopis, J. and Garcó, J. (2006) El offshore outsourcing de sistemas de información. Universia business review-actualidad económica, 38, 80-91.
[4] Assar, S. and Boughzala, I. (2008) Empirical Evaluation of Public E-Procurement Platforms in France. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 2, 90-108.
[5] Hussmann, K.A. (2004) La Promesa de las compras públicas Electrónicas: El caso de Chilecompra (2000-2003). Unpublished Masters, Universidad de Chile, Santiago.
[6] Hochstetter, J., Cachero, C., Cares, C. and Sepúlveda, S. (2012) Call for Tenders Challenges in Practice: A Field Study. Proceedings of the XV Congreso Iberoamericano en “Software Engineering” (CIbSE’12), Buenos Aires, 24-27 April 2012.
[7] Hochstetter, J., Díaz, C. and Cares, C. (2012) Software Call for Tenders: Metrics Based on Speech Acts. Proceedings of the Conferencia Ibèrica de sistemas y Tecnologías de Infomación (CISTI’12), Madrid, 20 al 23 de Junio de 2012, 451-456.
[8] Hochstettr, J. and Cares, C. (2012) Call for Software Tenders: Features and Research Problems. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA’12), Lisboa, 18-23 November 2012.
[9] IEEE (1998) IEEE Std 830-1998 IEEE Standard for Software Requirements Specification. IEEE Computer Society, Piscataway.
[10] Carvallo, X. and Franch, J.P. (2009) On the Use of Requirements for Driving Call-for-Tender Processes for Procuring Coarse-Grained OTS Components. 17th IEEE International, Proceedings of the Requirements Engineering Conference, Atlanta, 31 August 2009, 287-292.
[11] Biffl, S., Winkler, D., H?hn, R. and Wetzel, H. (2006) Software Process Improvement in Europe: Potential of the New V-Modell XT and Research Issues. Software Process Improvement Practice, 11, 229-238.
[12] Team, C. (2010) Cmmi for Acquisition, Version 1.3.
[13] Brender, J. and McNair, P. (2001) User Requirements Specifications: A Hierarchical Structure Covering Strategical, Tactical and Operational Requirements. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64, 83-98.
[14] Costa, C.B.E., Corrêa, E., Corted, J.-M.D. and Vansnickd, J.-C. (2002) Facilitating Bid Evaluation in Public Call for Tenders: A Socio-Technical Approach. Omega, 30, 227-242.
[15] Renault, S., Ménez-Bonilla, ó., Franch, X. and Quer, C. (2009) A Pattern-Based Method for Building Requirements Documents in Call-for-Tender Processes. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications, 6, 175-202.
[16] Hartson, R. (2003) Cognitive, Physical, Sensory, and Functional Affordances in Interaction Design. Interaction Design, 22, 315-338.
[17] Nah, F.F.-H. and Davis, S. (2002) HCI Research Issues in E-Commerce. Forrester Research, 3, 98-113.
[18] Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G. and Attar, R. (2009) A Survey of Software Learnability: Metrics, Methodologies and Guide-Lines. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: ACM, Boston, 4-9 April 2009, 649-658.
[19] (2014) Tendenciasdigitales. Conociendo el mercado de internet latinoamericano: Chile, Venezuela y Uruguay se ubican en el top 3 del índice Web 2.0.
[20] (2014) Tendenciasdigitales. Conociendo el mercado de internet latinoamericano: Tendencias digitales. Penetración de Internet en Latinoamérica se ubica en 37%.
[21] Lindgaard, G. and Dudek, C. (2003) What Is This Evasive Beast We Call User Satisfaction? Oxford University Press, Oxford, 429-452.
[22] Al-Maskari, A. and Sanderson, M. (2010) A Review of Factors Influencing User Satisfaction in Information Retrieval. Wiley Online Library, 61, 859-868.
[23] OMG (2014) OMG Unified Modeling Language TM (OMG UML), Superstructure.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.