Are There Economies of Scale in Highway Maintenance? What about Costs Due to Market Power?

Abstract

The object of this paper is to determine whether there are economies or diseconomies of scale in highway maintenance and whether higher concentration levels/greater market power across the governments involved in highway maintenance results in higher or lower cost levels. The data used come from New York State municipalities. New York is divided into Towns and Cities that added together give the total land area for the State. There are also Villages that are located in one or more Towns. All of these government entities may own and manage/maintain highways. The results are that 1) there are significantly U-shaped average cost curves, but the differences in average costs between communities with lower numbers or higher numbers of lane miles than the most efficient are not very great and 2) there are both substantial and significant increases in average costs when market power is greater. Thus, making the case for mergers of communities is more difficult and such mergers would be more problematic.

Share and Cite:

Southwick, L. (2014) Are There Economies of Scale in Highway Maintenance? What about Costs Due to Market Power?. iBusiness, 6, 82-100. doi: 10.4236/ib.2014.62010.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Geys, B. (2006) Looking across Borders: A Test of Spatial Policy Interdependence Using Local Government Efficiency Ratings. Discussion Paper SP II 2006 - 03, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.
[2] Jiminez, B. and Hendrick, R. (2010) Is Government Consolidation the Answer? State and Local Government Review, 42, 258-270.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0160323X10386805
[3] Tiebout, C. (1956) A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 416-424.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/257839
[4] Southwick Jr., L. (2005) Economies of Scale and Market Power in Policing. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26, 461-473.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mde.1230
[5] Endreny, T.A. and Doherty, J. (2005) Snow Removal. In: The Encyclopedia of New York State, Syracuse University Press, 1428-1429,
[6] Grossman, P., Mavros, P. and Wassmer, R. (1996) Public Sector Inefficiency in Large US Cities. Working Paper, 96, California State University, Sacramento.
[7] Berg, W.D. (1972) Local Road Costs and Economies of Scale. Journal of the Transportation Engineering Division, 98, 881-890.
[8] Christofferson, H. and Larsen, K.B. (2007) Economies of Scale in Danish Municipalities. Local Government Studies, 33, 77-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03003930601081283
[9] Goldin, K. (1968) Three Aspects of Highway Efficiency: Amount, Quality and Price. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 349-366.
[10] Bracknell Forest Council (2011) Highway Maintenance. 28 pages.
[11] Levinson, D. and Yerra, B. (2002) Highway Costs and Efficient Mix of State and Local Funds. Transportation Research Record 1812, Paper No. 02-2752, 27-36.
[12] Holcombe, R.G. and Williams, D.W. (2010) Urban Sprawl and Transportation Externalities. The Review of Regional Studies, 40, 257-273
[13] Holcombe, R.G. and Williams, D.W. (2012) Urban Sprawl and Transportation Externalities. The Review of Regional Studies, 40, 257-273.
[14] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. and Rhodes E. (1978) Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
[15] Amatatsu, H., Ueda, T. and Amatatsu, Y (2011) Efficiency and Returns-To-Scale of Local Governments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63, 299-305.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.38
[16] Afonso, A. and Fernandes, S. (2008) Assessing and Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Local Government. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1946-1979.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.007
[17] Benito, B., Bastida, F. and García, J. (2010) Explaining Differences in Efficiency: An Application to Spanish Municipalities. Applied Economics, 42, 515-528.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840701675560
[18] Brynes, J., Dollery, B. and Lopez, M. (2009) An Empirical Evaluation of the Relative Efficiency of Roads to Recovery Expenditure in New South Wales Local Government, 2005/06. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 15, 311-328.
[19] Rouse, P. and Putterill, M. (2005) Local Government Amalgamation Policy: A Highway Maintenance Evaluation. Management Accounting Research, 16, 438-463.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2005.07.003
[20] Rouse, P. and Putterill, M. (2003) Measuring the Effects of Local Government Reform: A New Zealand Highway Maintenance Application. Department of Accounting and Finance, The University of Auckland, Auckland.
[21] Geys, B. and Moesen, W. (2009) Measuring Local Government Technical (In)Efficiency: An Application and Comparison of FDH, DEA, and Econometric Approaches. Public Performance & Management Review, 32, 499-513.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576320401
[22] De Palma, A., Lindsey, R. and Quinet, E. (Eds.) (2011) A Handbook of Transport Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 928 pp.
[23] Williams, D. (2006) The Impact of Population Density and Racial Composition on Municipal Government Expenditures. Dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
[24] Weicher, J. (1970) Determinants of Central City Expenditures: Some Overlooked Factors and Problems. National Tax Journal, 23, 379-396.
[25] Staley, S. (1992) Bigger Is Not Better: The Virtues of Decentralized Local Government. Cato Policy Analysis No. 166.
[26] Dollery, B., Brynes, J. and Crase, L. (2007) Is Bigger Better? Local Government Amalgamation and the South Australian Rising to the Challenge Inquiry. Economic Analysis & Policy, 37, 1-14.
[27] Faguet, J.P. (2000) Decentralization and Local Government Performance Improving Public Service in Bolivia. Revista de Economia del Rosario, 3, 127-176.
[28] Feiock, R. (2007) Rational Choice and Regional Governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29, 47-63.
[29] Humplink, F. and Moini-Araghi, A. (1996) Is There an Optimal Structure for Decentralized Provision of Roads? The World Bank Policy Research Department Environment, Infrastructure, and Agriculture Division.
[30] Reingewertz, Y. (2012) Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? Evidence from Municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics, 72, 240-251.
[31] Staley, S., Faulk, D., Leland, S. and Schansberg, E. (2005) The Effects of City-County Consolidation: A Review of the Recent Academic Literature. Indiana Policy Review Foundation.
[32] Couch J., King, B., Gossett, C. and Parris, J. (2004) Economies of Scale and the Provision of Public Goods by Municipalities. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 5, 69-79.
[33] Hicks, M. and Bohanon, C. (2008) Kernan-Shepard Commission and Local Government Expenditures Draft. Ball State University, Muncie, 13 pp.
[34] Geys, B., Heinemann, F. and Kalb, A. (2007) Local Governments in the Wake of Demographic Change: Efficiency and Economies of Scale in German Municipalities. Discussion Paper No. 07-036, Centre for European Economic Research.
[35] Link, H. (2006) An Econometric Analysis of Motorway Renewal Costs in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40, 19-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.04.005
[36] Southwick Jr., L. (2012) Economies of Scale in Local Government: General Government Spending. iBusiness, 4, 265-278.
[37] Sjoqjuist, D. (1982) The Effect of the Number of Local Governments on Central City Expenditures. National Tax Journal, 35, 79-87.
[38] Lisk, D. (1998) Competing for Highway Maintenance: Lessons for Washington State. Policy Brief, Washington Policy Center.
[39] Federal Trade Commission (1992) 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines.
http://www.ftc.gov/bc/docs/horizmer.htm
[40] Federal Trade Commission and US Department of Justice (2006) Commentary on the Horizontal Merger Guidelines.
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2006/03/CommentaryontheHorizo ntalMergerGuidelinesMarch2006.pdf

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.