Electrowinning of Copper Using Rotating Cylinder Electrode Utilizing Lead Anode

Hesham Soliman, Ahmed Abd El-Moneim

.

DOI: 10.4236/eng.2011.34039                

Abstract

The effect of lead anode, rotating cylinder electrode (RCE), amount of 1,2-dihydroxypropane (12-DHP), temperature and rotation on the electrowinning of copper from low concentration acidified copper sulphate solution has been investigated. Copper powder was electrodeposited onto RCE that made of pure copper. From cyclic voltammetry experiments, an empirical parameter called the departure percent, S, was obtained which may represent the stability of the organic additive in the given medium and under the experimental conditions. The inhibition percentage, P, was 0.00 - 89.91% depending on the experimental variables. P was affected by temperature and mole fraction of 12-DHP, while rotation did not show any influence on it. Values of activation energy of electrodeposition process, Ea, were found to be less than 28 kJ mol-1 indicating diffusion controlled process. The overall mass transfer correlations under the present conditions have been computed using the dimensional analysis method. The data were valid for 90 < Sh < 1098, 737 < Sc < 59284 and 271 < Re < 7046 and the results agreed with the previous studies of mass transfer to rotating cylinders in turbulent flow regimes. The effect of time, content of 12-DHP, temperature and the speed of rotation on the morphological changes of the electrodeposited copper powder as well as deposits composition and crystallite size have been studied. Various crystallite sizes ranged 7.1 nm - 250.6 nm were obtained and characterized by EDS and XRD. Different topographs proved that the rate of copper electrodeposition increased by increasing deposition time, temperature and the speed of rotation. Also, they proved that the deposition rate decreased by adding 12-DHP to the solution. Therefore, the results obtained by SEM supported those achieved by measuring the limiting current density and follow the normal manner when organic solvents were added to the electrodeposition bath.

Keywords

Electrodeposition, Electrowinning, Lead Anode, Rotating Cylinder Electrode (RCE), 1, 2-Dihydroxypropane (12-DHP), Copper Powder

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	J. L. Sigley, P. C. Johnson and S. P. Beaudoin, “Use of Nonionic Surfactant to Reduce Sulfuric Acid Mist in the Copper Electrowinning Process,” Hydrometallurgy, Vol. 70, No. 1-3, July 2003, pp. 1-8. doi:10.1016/S0304-386X(03)00077-X|
[2]	H. M. A. Soliman and H. H. Abdel-Rahman, “The Use of Rotating Cylinder Electrode to Study the Effect of 1,3-Dihydroxypropane on the Production of Copper Powder,” Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2006, pp. 705-714. doi:10.1590/S0103-50532006000400011
[3]	M. Alodan and W. Smyrl, “Effect of Thiourea on Copper Dissolution and Deposition,” Electrochim Acta, Vol. 44, No. 2-3, September 1998, pp. 299-309. doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00060-7
[4]	Z. D. Stan-kovic, “Effect of Gelatine and Thiourea on the Kinetics and Mechanism of Anodic Dissolution and Cathodic De-position of Copper,” Erzmetall, Vol. 38, No. 7-8, July 1985, pp. 361-365.
[5]	L. Muresan, S. Varvara, G. Maurin and S. Dorneanu, “The Effect of Some Organic Additives upon Copper Electrowinning from Sulphate Electrolytes,” Hydrometallurgy, Vol. 54, No. 2-3, January 2000, pp. 161-169. doi:10.1016/S0304-386X(99)00063-8
[6]	J. Vereecken and R. Winand, “Influence of Polyacrylamides on the Quality of Copper Deposits from Acidic Copper Sulphate Solutions,” Surface Technology, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1976, pp. 227-235. doi:10.1016/0376-4583(76)90035-2
[7]	L. Mirkova, N. Petkova, I. Popova and St. Rashkov, “The Effect of Some Surface Active Additives upon the Quality of Cathodic Copper Deposits During the Electrorefining Process,” Hydrometallurgy, Vol. 36, No. 2, September 1994, pp. 201-213. doi:10.1016/0304-386X(94)90006-X
[8]	H. M. A. So-liman, “Formalin Solution and Acetone as Organic Addi-tives in Electrodeposition of Copper,” Applied Surface Science, Vol. 195, No. 1-4, July 2002, pp. 155-165. doi:10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00553-6
[9]	I. Z. Selim, K. M. El-Sobki, H. M. A. Soliman and A. A. Khedr, “Influ-ence of Some Organic Solvents on Electrodeposition of Copper Using Vertical Parallel Plates,” Bulletin of Elec-trochemical Industry, Vol. 16, No. 7, 2000, pp. 315-325.
[10]	R. Winand, “Application of Polarisation Measurements in the Control of Metal Deposition,” El-sevier Science, Amsterdam, 1984.
[11]	D. R. Gabe and F. C. Walsh, “Enhanced Mass Transfer at the Rotating Cy-linder Electrode. I. Characterization of a Smooth Cylinder and Roughness Development in Solutions of Constant Concentration,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1984, pp. 555-564. doi:10.1007/BF00626299
[12]	C. P. Wilde, S. V. De Cliff, K. C. Hui and D. J. L. Brett, “The Influence of Ad-sorbed Hydrogen and Recycling on the EQCM Response of Electrodeposited Pt Electrodes,” Electrochim Acta, Vol. 45, No. 22-23, July 2000, pp. 3649-3658. doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00448-5
[13]	F. Franks, “Physicochemical Processes in Mixed Aqueous Solvents,” American Elsevier, New York, 1967.
[14]	M. Eisenberg, C. W. Tobias and C. R. Wilke, “Ionic Mass Transfer and Concentration Polarization at Rotating Electrode,” Journal of Electrochemical Society, Vol. 101, No. 6, 1954, pp. 306-320. doi:10.1149/1.2781252
[15]	A. A. Taha, “Study of the Effect of Ethylene Glycol and Glycerol on the Rate of Electropolishing of Copper by the Rotating Disk Technique,” Anti-Corros Method M, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2000, pp. 94-104. doi:10.1108/00035590010316458
[16]	I. M. Issa, M. M. Ghoneim, A. A. El-Samahy and M. Tharwat, “Polaro-graphic Behaviour of Manganese (III) Complexes with Sulphate and Phosphate in Absence and Presence of Sur-factants,” Electrochim Acta, Vol. 17, No. 7, 1972, pp. 1251-1259. doi:10.1016/0013-4686(72)80012-4
[17]	T. R. Beck and R. C. Alkire, “Occurrence of Salt Films during Initiation and Growth of Corrosion Pits,” Journal of the Electro-chemical Society, Vol. 126, No. 10, October 1979, pp. 1662-1666. doi:10.1149/1.2128772
[18]	Y. N. Sadana and S. Nageswar, “Electrodeposition of Copper on Copper in the Presence of Dithiothreitol,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1984, pp. 489-494. doi:10.1007/BF00610814
[19]	I. Z. Selim, A. M. Ahmed and H. M. A. Soliman, “Use of The Rotating Cylinder Electrode to Study The Effect of Ethanol on Copper Electrodeposition,” Bulletin of Electrochemical Industry, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2001, pp. 27-45.
[20]	T. N. Andersen, C. H. Pitt and L. S. Livingston, “Nodulation of Electrodepo-sited Copper due to Suspended Particulate,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1983, pp. 429-438. doi:10.1007/BF00617517
[21]	G. A. Hope, G. M. Brown, D. P. Schweinsberg, K. Shimizu and K. Ko-bayashi, “Observations of Inclusions of Polymeric Addi-tives in Copper Electrodeposits by Trans- mission Electron Microscopy,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, Vol. 25, No. 9, 1995, pp. 890-894. doi:10.1007/BF00772211
[22]	D. Russev, “An Electron Microscope Investigation of Electrolytic Copper Powd-ers,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1981, pp. 177-185. doi:10.1007/BF00610978
[23]	D. Pletcher, I. Whyte, F. C. Walsh and J. P. Millington, “Reticulated Vitreous Carbon Cathodes for Metal Ion Removal from Process Streams: Part I: Mass Transport Studies,” Journal of Ap-plied Electrochemistry, Vol. 21, No. 8, 1991, pp. 659-666. doi:10.1007/BF01034042