Share This Article:

Comparison of Two Electronic Root Canal Length Measurement Devices: The Differences between Ratio Two Impedance Frequencies and Multi Frequencies

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:301KB) PP. 263-267
DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2014.45037    2,437 Downloads   3,289 Views  

ABSTRACT

Accuracy electronic root canal length measurement devices were important for root canal treatment. Aim: To evaluate and compare accuracy of the two electronic root canal length measurement devices; two frequencies impedance ratio and multi frequencies. Methods: Forty anterior teeth were sectioned on their cervical area. All samples were measured root canal length by radiographic. On the second phase, all the samples were measured by two frequencies impedance ratio and multi frequencies electronic devices. In the final phase, the teeth were split vertically and actual lengths were measured. All measurement by radiographic and electronic method was subtracted with actual length. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Results: Accuracy of the two frequencies impedance ratio 50% and multi frequencies 47.5%. No statistical significance between two frequencies impedance ratio and multi frequencies. Conclusions: There is no difference between ratio two impedance frequencies and multi frequencies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Suprastiwi, E. and Meidyawati, R. (2014) Comparison of Two Electronic Root Canal Length Measurement Devices: The Differences between Ratio Two Impedance Frequencies and Multi Frequencies. Open Journal of Stomatology, 4, 263-267. doi: 10.4236/ojst.2014.45037.

References

[1] Ricucci, D. and Langeland, K. (1998) Apical Limit of Root Canal Instrumentation and Obturation Part 2. A Histological Study. International Endodontic Journal, 31, 399-409.
[2] Nekoofar, M., Ghandi, M., Hayes, S. and Dummer, P. (2006) The Fundamental Operating Principles of Electronic Root Canal Length Measurement Devices. International Endodontic Journal, 39, 595-609.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01131.x
[3] Plotino, G., Grande, N., Brigante, L., Lesti, B. and Somma, F. (2006) Ex Vivo Accuracy of Three Electronic Apex Locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and ProPex. International Endodontic Journal, 39, 408-414.
[4] Dimitrov, S. and Dimitur, R. (2009) Sixth Generation Adaptive Apex Locator. Journal of IMAB-Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers).
[5] Gordon, M. and Chandler, N. (2004) Electronic Apex Locators. International Endodontic Journal, 37, 425-437.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00835.x
[6] Jenkins, J.A., Walker Iii, W.A., Schindler, W.G. and Flores, C.M. (2001) An in Vitro Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Root ZX in the Presence of Various Irrigants. Journal of Endodontics, 27, 209-211.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200103000-00018
[7] Real, D.G., Davidowicz, H., Moura-Netto, C., Zenkner Cd, L.L., Pagliarin, C.M.L., Barletta, F.B., et al. (2011) Accuracy of Working Length Determination Using 3 Electronic Apex Locators and Direct Digital Radiography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 111, e44-e49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.10.033
[8] Assuncao, F. (2010) Ex Vivo Evaluation of the Accuracy and Coefficient of Repeatability of Three Electronic Apex Locator Using a Simple Mounting Model: A Preliminary Report. International Endodontic Journal, 43, 269-274.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01674.x
[9] Madiyono, B., Moeslichan, S., Sastroasmoro, S., Budiman, I. and Purwanto, S. (2002) Perkiraan Besar Sampel. In: Sastroasmoro, S. and Ismael, S., Eds., Dasar-Dasar Metodologi Penelitian Klinis, Sagung Seto, Jakarta, 285.
[10] Walton, R. (2008) Diagnostic Imaging A. Endodontic Radiography. In: Ingle, J., Bakland, L. and Baumgartner, J.C., Eds., Endodontics, 6th Edition, People’s Medical Publishing House, 554-557.
[11] Vieyra, J., Acosta, J. and Mondaca, J. (2010) Comparison of Working Length Determination with Radiographs and Two Electronic Apex Locators. International Endodontic Journal, 43, 16-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01620.x
[12] Meredith, N. and Gulabivala, K. (1997) Electrical Impedance Measurement of Root Canal Length. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology, 13, 126-131.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1997.tb00025.x
[13] Welk, A.R., Baumgartner, J.C., Marshall, J.G. (2003) An in Vivo Comparison of Two Frequency-Based Electronic Apex Locators. Journal of Endodontics, 29, 497-500.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200308000-00002
[14] Huang, L. (1987) An Experimental Study of the Principle of Electronic Root Canal Measurement. Journal of Endodontics, 13, 60-64.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80156-5
[15] Javidi, M., Moradi, S., Rashed, R. and Raziee, L. (2009) In Vitro Comparative Study of Conventional Radiography and Root ZX Apex Locator in Determining Root Canal Working Length. The New York State Dental Journal, 75, 48-51.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.