Fundamental Architecture and Analysis of an Antimatter Ultra-Intense Laser Derived Pulsed Space Propulsion System

Abstract

Antimatter has been generated in large quantities by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Titan laser. The Titan laser is an ultra-intense laser system on the order of approximately 1020W/cm2 with pulse durations of roughly 1ps. With the Titan laser incident on a high atomic number target, such as gold, antimatter on the scale of 2 × 1010 positrons are generated. Roughly 90% of the generated positrons are ejected anisotropic and aft to the respective target. The mechanisms for the laser-derived positron antimatter generation involve electron interaction with the nuclei based on bremsstrahlung photons that yield electron-positron pairs as a consequence of the Bethe-Heitler process, which predominates the Trident process. Given the constraints of the current and near future technology space, a pulsed space propulsion configuration is advocated for antimatter derived space propulsion, similar in concept to pulsed radioisotope propulsion. Antimatter is generated through an ultra-intense laser on the scale of a Titan laser incident on a gold target and annihilated in a closed chamber, representative of a combustion chamber. Upon reaching a temperature threshold, the closed chamber opens, producing a pulse of thrust. The implication of the pulsed space propulsion antimatter architecture is that the energy source for the antimatter propulsion system can be decoupled from the actual spacecraft. In contrast to conventional chemical propulsion systems, which require storage of its respective propulsive chemical potential energy, the proposed antimatter propulsion architecture may have the energy source at a disparate location from the spacecraft. The ultra-intense laser could convey its laser energy over a distance to the actual spacecraft equipped with the positron antimatter pulsed space propulsion system. Hydrogen is considered as the propulsive fluid, in light of its low molecular weight. Fundamental analysis is applied to preliminarily define the performance of the positron antimatter derived pulsed space propulsion system. The fundamental performance analysis of the antimatter pulsed space propulsion system successfully reveals the architecture is viable for further evaluation.

Share and Cite:

Moyne, R. and Mastroianni, T. (2014) Fundamental Architecture and Analysis of an Antimatter Ultra-Intense Laser Derived Pulsed Space Propulsion System. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2, 10-18. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2014.25002.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Froning Jr., H.D. (1988) Investigation of Antimatter Air-Breathing Propulsion for Single-Stage-to-Orbit Ships. Acta Astronautica, 17, 853-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(88)90168-3
[2] LeMoyne, R. (2012) Fundamental Architecture and Analysis of Ramjet Propulsion System Utilizing In-Situ Laser Derived Antimatter. Proceedings of 18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, AIAA-2012-5863, Tours, France, September.
[3] Shearer, J. W., Garrison, J., Wong, J. and Swain, J. E. (1973) Pair Production by Relativistic Electrons from an Intense Laser Focus. Physical Review A, 8, 1582-1588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.8.1582
[4] Chen, H., Wilks, S.C., Bonlie, J.D., Chen, S.N., Cone, K.V., Elberson, L.N., Gregori, G., Meyerhofer, D.D., Myatt, J., Price, D.F., Schneider, M.B., Shepherd, R., Stafford, D.C., Tommasini, R., Van Maren, R. and Beiersdorfer, P. (2009) Making Relativistic Positrons Using Ultraintense Short Pulse Lasers. Physics of Plasmas, 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3271355
[5] Chen, H., Wilks, S.C., Bonlie, J.D., Liang, E.P., Myatt, J., Price, D.F., Meyerhofer, D.D. and Beiersdorfer, P. (2009) Relativistic Positron Creation Using Ultraintense Short Pulse Lasers. Physical Review Letters, 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.105001
[6] LeMoyne, R. (2006) Fundamental Analysis of Radioisotope Propulsion. Proceedings of Space 2006, AIAA-2006-7272, San Jose, California, September.
[7] Williams, G.J., Jenkins, R.M. and Rose, M.F. (1994) Preliminary Design of a Space Propulsion System Utilizing Stored Thermal Energy. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 10, 32-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.23708
[8] Harris, D., Bille, M. and Reed, L. (2003) Future Space Transportation Technology: Prospects and Priorities. Proceedings of Space 2003, AIAA-2003-6201, Long Beach, California, September.
[9] Schmidt, G.R., Gerrish, H.P. Martin, J.J., Smith, G.A. and Meyer, K.J. (1999) Antimatter Production for Near-Term Propulsion Applications. Proceedings of 35th AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-1999-2691, Los Angeles, California, June.
[10] Derosa, L. and Maccone, C. (2007) Propulsion Tradeoffs for a Mission to Alpha Centauri. ActaAstronautica, 60, 711- 718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.10.003
[11] Serway, R.A., Moses, C.J. and Moyer, C.A. (1989) Modern Physics. Saunders College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
[12] Frisbee, R.H. (2003) Advanced Propulsion for The XXI Century. Proceedings of AIAA/ICAS International Air andSpace Symposium and Exposition, AIAA-2003-2589, Dayton, Ohio, July.
[13] Haloulakos, V.E. (1996) Antimatter-The Ultimate Energy Source and Its Potential Applications. Proceedings of 32nd AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-1996-2928, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, July.
[14] Fuhs, A. (1990) Future Science and Technology for Military Space. Proceedings of AIAA Space Programs and Technologies Conference, AIAA-1990-3827, Huntsville, Alabama, September.
[15] Frisbee, R.H. (2008) Optimization of Antimatter Rocket Performance. Proceedings of 44th AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-2008-4796, Hartford, Connecticut, July.
[16] Cassenti, B. (1989) Conceptual Designs for Antiproton Space Propulsion Systems. Proceedings of AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, 25th Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA-1989-2333, Monterey, California, July.
[17] Frisbee, R.H. and Leifer, S.D. (1998) Evaluation of Propulsion Options for Interstellar Missions. Proceedings of 34th AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-1998-3403, Cleveland, Ohio, July.
[18] Coreano, L. and Cassenti, B.N. (2004) A Comparison of Antimatter Driven Interstellar Propulsion Systems. Proceedings of 40th AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-2004-3705, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, July.
[19] Forward, R.L. (1986) Feasibility of Interstellar Travel: A Review. ActaAstronautica, 14, 243-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(86)90126-8
[20] Tarpley, C., Lewis, M.J. and Kothari, A.P. (1990) Safety Issues in SSTO Spacecraft Powered by Antimatter Rocket Engines. Proceedings ofAIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, 26th Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA-1990-2365, Orlando, Florida, July.
[21] Vulpetti, G. (1987) A Further Analysis About the Liquid-Propellant Thermal Antimatter Engine Design Concept. ActaAstronautica, 15, 551-555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(87)90155-X
[22] Frisbee, R.H. (2003) How to Build an Antimatter Rocket for Interstellar Missions-Systems Level Considerations in Designing Advanced Propulsion Technology Vehicles. Proceedings of 39th AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-2003-4676, Huntsville, Alabama, July.
[23] Cassenti, B., Kammash, T. and Galbraith, D. (1994) An Antiproton Catalyzed Inertial Fusion Propulsion System. Proceedings of 30th AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-1994-3354, Indianapolis, Indiana, June.
[24] Cassenti, B.N., Kammash, T. and Galbraith, D.L. (1996) Antiproton Catalyzed Fusion Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions. Proceedings of 32nd AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA- 1996-3068, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, July.
[25] Frisbee, R.H., Brophy, J.R. and VanLandingham, E.E. (1996) Status of NASA’s Advanced Propulsion Technology program. Proceedings of 32nd AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 1996-2784, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, July. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.1996-2784
[26] Winterberg, F. (2012) Matter-Antimatter Gigaelectron Volt Gamma Ray Laser Rocket Propulsion. Acta Astronautica, 81, 34-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.07.001
[27] Ketsdever, A.D., Young, M.P. and Mossman, J.B. (2008) An Overview of Advanced Concepts for Space Access. Proceedings of 44th AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-2008-5121, Hartford, Connecticut, July.
[28] Nakashima, K. and Takabe, H. (2002) Numerical Study of Pair Creation by Ultraintense Lasers. Physics of Plasmas, 9, 1505-1512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1464145
[29] Anderson, J.D. (1989) Introduction to Flight. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[30] Sutton, G.P. (1992) Rocket Propulsion Elements. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
[31] Serway, R.A. (1990) Physics for Scientists and Engineers. Saunders College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
[32] http://aries.ucsd.edu/LIB/PROPS/PANOS/w.html
[33] Turns, S.R. (1996) An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[34] Andrews, D.G. (2004) Interstellar Propulsion Opportunities Using Near-Term Technologies. ActaAstronautica, 55, 443-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.038
[35] http://www.protons.com/protons/who-we-are/about-proton-therapy/index.page

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.