Share This Article:

Are Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents More Effective in Women than Early-Generation Ones?

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:233KB) PP. 146-148
DOI: 10.4236/wjcd.2014.44021    3,775 Downloads   4,486 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Evidence-based research is increasingly aimed at differentiating between no proof of difference (failed demonstration of superiority) and proof of no difference (demonstration of equivalence). The latter requires that equivalence margins are incorporated in the analysis of outcomes. We applied an analysis of equivalence to study the incremental benefit of newer-generation vs early-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in women receiving percutaneous coronary intervention. The clinical material was derived from published data. Our equivalence testing was focused on the end-point of target-lesion revascularisation (TLR). Results were expressed as rate differences (RDs), while the equivalence margins (±2.9%) were derived from the statistical power calculations of a recent trial. Our results clearly indicated that, in women, there was an equivalent effectiveness between newer-generation and early-generation of DES.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Messori, A. , Fadda, V. , Maratea, D. and Trippoli, S. (2014) Are Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents More Effective in Women than Early-Generation Ones?. World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 4, 146-148. doi: 10.4236/wjcd.2014.44021.

References

[1] Stefanini, G.G., Baber, U., Windecker, S., Morice, M.C., Sartori, S., Leon, M.B., Stone, G.W., Serruys, P.W., Wijns, W., Weisz, G., Camenzind, E., Steg, P.G., Smits, P.C., Kandzari, D., Von Birgelen, C., Galatius, S., Jeger, R.V., Kimura, T., Mikhail, G., Itchhaporia, D., Mehta, L., Ortega, R., Kim, H.S., Valgimigli, M., Kastrati, A., Chieffo, A. and Mehran, R. (2013) Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Stents in Women: A Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of Randomised Trials. Lancet, 382, 1879-1888.
[2] Stone, G.W., Rizvi, A., Newman, W., Mastali, K., Wang, J.C., Caputo, R., Doostzadeh, J., Cao, S., Simonton, C.A., Sudhir, K., Lansky, A.J., Cutlip, D.E. and Kereiakes, D.J. (2010) Everolimus-Eluting versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 1663-1674.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0910496
[3] Messori, A., Fadda, V., Maratea, D. and Trippoli, S. (2014) Outcomes with Short-Term versus Long-Term Antiplatelet Dual Therapy after Drug-Eluting Stenting: Quantifying the Equivalence Margins. International Journal of Cardiology, 172, 469-470.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.228
[4] Messori, A., Maratea, D., Fadda, V. and Trippoli, S. (2014) Risk of Intracranial Haemorrhage in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Novel Oral Anticoagulants: Testing the Equivalence Margins between Dabigratran, Rivaroxaban and Apixaban. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 70, 505-506.
[5] Ahn, S., Park, S.H. and Lee, K.H. (2013) How to Demonstrate Similarity by Using Non-Inferiority and Equivalence Statistical Testing in Radiology Research. Radiology, 267, 328-338.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120725

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.