下载pdf注册的cookie // function getcookie() { // var cookieName = "pdfddcookie"; // var cookieValue = null; //返回cookie的value值 // if (document.cookie != null && document.cookie != '') { // var cookies = document.cookie.split(';'); //将获得的所有cookie切割成数组 // for (var i = 0; i < cookies.length; i++) { // var cookie = cookies[i]; //得到某下标的cookies数组 // if (cookie.substring(0, cookieName.length + 2).trim() == cookieName.trim() + "=") {//如果存在该cookie的话就将cookie的值拿出来 // cookieValue = cookie.substring(cookieName.length + 2, cookie.length); // break // } // } // } // if (cookieValue != "" && cookieValue != null) {//如果存在指定的cookie值 // return false; // } // else { // // return true; // } // } // function ShowTwo(webUrl){ // alert("22"); // $.funkyUI({url:webUrl,css:{width:"600",height:"500"}}); // } //window.onload = pdfdownloadjudge;
OJRad> Vol.4 No.2, June 2014
Share This Article:
Cite This Paper >>

Improving Ordering Practices and Radiology Workflow in the Emergency Department through Multidisciplinary Didactic Series: Survey Based Evaluation

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:428KB) PP. 145-154
DOI: 10.4236/ojrad.2014.42019    3,106 Downloads   4,378 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment
Geraldine Abbey-Mensah, Andrew Kesselman, David Areman

Affiliation(s)

Department of Radiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of our Quality Improvement (QI) project was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiology-led didactics on efficiency and ordering practices in the emergency department. Residents of the emergency medicine (EM) program at Downstate Medical Center/Kings County Hospital (postgraduate years 1 - 4) participated in a didactic lecture series during the first two months of the 2013 academic year. Two fifteen-minute lectures with a question and answer session were designed to focus on radiation risk, American College of Radiology (ACR) appropriateness criteria and the department of radiology’s policies. A short survey questionnaire that included questions on ACR appropriateness criteria, radiology experiences and opinions/attitudes regarding radiology was distributed and analyzed before and after the didactic series. The average score for the knowledge-based technical questions on ACR appropriateness criteria was 60.5% initially and 76.4% post-lecture with an overall improvement of 25%, which was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Following a short didactic lecture series, EM residents showed significant improvement of their knowledge of appropriate image utilization on the post-lecture survey. This highlights the need for dedicated radiology-led lecture series for EM residents. This type of program could be implemented yearly and expanded to other departments to promote interdepartmental commuication, increases radiology awareness, improves ordering practices and encourages appropriate imaging utilization.

KEYWORDS

ACR Appropriateness Criteria; Quality Improvement; Emergency Department; Referring Physicians

Cite this paper

Abbey-Mensah, G. , Kesselman, A. and Areman, D. (2014) Improving Ordering Practices and Radiology Workflow in the Emergency Department through Multidisciplinary Didactic Series: Survey Based Evaluation. Open Journal of Radiology, 4, 145-154. doi: 10.4236/ojrad.2014.42019.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Eng, J., Mysko, W.K., Weller, G.E.R., et al. (2000) Interpretation of Emergency Department Radiographs: A Comparison of Emergency Medicine Physicians with Radiologist, Residents with Faculty, and Film with Digital Display. American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), 175, 1233-1238. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.5.1751233
[2] Gunderman, R.B., Bettmann, M. and Davis, L.P. (2007) Promoting Educational Innovation: Lessons from the Request for Proposals for ACR Appropriateness Criteria Usage in Medical Education. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 4, 919-924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2007.07.003
[3] Bautista, A.B., Burgos, A., Nickel, B.J., et al. (2009) Do Clinicians Use the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria in the Management of Their Patients. American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), 192, 1581-1585.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1622
[4] Studdert, D.M., Mello, M.M., Sage, W.M., et al. (2005) Defensive Medicine among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice Environment. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 293, 2609-2617.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.21.2609
[5] Dym, R.J., Burns, J. and Taragin, B.H. (2013) Appropriateness of Imaging Studies Ordered by Emergency Medicine Residents: Results of an Online Survey. American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), 201, W619-W625.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10487
[6] Griffey, R. and Sodickson, A. (2009) Cumulative Radiation Exposure and Cancer Risk Estimates in Emergency Department Patients Undergoing Repeat or Multiple CT. American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), 192, 887-892.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1351
[7] News Releases (2013) SGR Replacement Policy Draft Endorses Use of Appropriateness Criteria in Medical Imaging Exam Ordering.
[8] Taragin, B.H., Feng, L. and Ruzal-Shapiro, C. (2003) Online Radiology Appropriateness Survey: Results and Conclusions from an Academic Internal Medicine Residency. Academic Radiology, 10, 781-785.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80123-X

  
comments powered by Disqus
OJRad Subscription
E-Mail Alert
OJRad Most popular papers
Publication Ethics & OA Statement
OJRad News
Frequently Asked Questions
Recommend to Peers
Recommend to Library
Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.