Share This Article:

Symmetry of echinoderms: From initial bilaterally-asymmetric metamerism to pentaradiality

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:2193KB) PP. 171-183
DOI: 10.4236/ns.2014.64021    5,491 Downloads   8,178 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Echinoderm radial symmetry has first appeared in the ambulacral system, when the ambulacral channel assumed the shape of a closed ring or a horseshoe with approximated ends, and then spread onto other organ systems. Its origin was a natural consequence of a steady increase of the original asymmetry of bilaterally-asymmetric three-segmented ancestors of echinoderms, culminated by closing of the ancestral linear metamerism into radiality. The evolutionary transformation from a simple pouchlike hydrocoel with one side channel to an elongated hydrocoel (located under the oesophagus) with two side channels, and finally to a nearly closed horseshoeshaped hydrocoel with three radial channels can be reconstructed based on the theca structure and the number of ambulacra in the row SolutaCincta-Helicoplacoidea. After the hydrocoel with three outbound ambulacral channels circled around the oesophagus as a horseshoe, it either closed into a ring, or its ends became closely approximated. This has determined the primary triradiate symmetry, which quickly transformed into pentaradial symmetry of the 2-1-2 type as a result of branching of two of the three primary radial channels. This occurred no earlier than the Late Vendian, when the first bilaterians appeared to have begun to acquire body appendages, and no later than the Early Cambrian, when the first skeletal remains of echinoderms entered the fossil record (in the Atdabanian). The 2-1-2 pentaradial symmetry evolved into the true pentaradiality as a result of shifting the timing of tentacle branching to earlier stages of ontogenesis and even spreading of the five tentacle primordia over the ambulacral ring. This occurred during the Ordovician.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Rozhnov, S. (2014) Symmetry of echinoderms: From initial bilaterally-asymmetric metamerism to pentaradiality. Natural Science, 6, 171-183. doi: 10.4236/ns.2014.64021.

References

[1] Beklemishev, V.N. (1964) Fundamentals of comparative anatomy of invertebrate animals. V. 1: Promorphologia. Nauka, Moscow, 432 p. [in Russian]
[2] MacBride, E.W. (1914) Text-book of embryology. Vol. I: Invertebrates, Macmillan, London.
[3] Grobben, K. (1923) Theoretische Erorterungen betreffend die phylogenetische Ableitung der Echinodermen. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 1.Abt, 132, 263-290.
[4] Smith, A.B. (2005) The pre-radial history of echinoderms. Geological Journal, 40, 255-280.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gj.1018
[5] Jefferies, R.P.S. (1986) The ancestry of the vertebrates. British Museum (Natural History), London, 376 p.
[6] Smith, A.B. (2008) Deuterostomes in a twist: The origins of a radical new body plan. Evolution and Development, 10, 493-503.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00260.x
[7] Smith, A.B., Peterson K.J., Wray, G. and Littlewood, D.T.J. (2004) From bilateral symmetry to pentaradiality: The phylogeny of hemichordates and echinoderms. In: Cracraft, J. and Donoghue, M.J., Eds., Assembling the Tree of Life, 365-383.
[8] Jefferies, R.P.S. (1997) A defence of the calcichordates. Lethaia, 30, 1-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1997.tb00437.x
[9] Ubaghs, G. (1967) Stylophora. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part S. Echinodermata 1 (2): S495-S565. Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas Press.
[10] Parsley, R.L. (1997) The echinoderm classes stylophora and Homoiostelea: Non Calciochordata. In: Waters, J.A. and Maples, C.G., Eds., Geobiology of Echinoderms, Paleontological Society Papers, 3, 225-248.
[11] David, B., Lefebvre, B., Mooi, R. and Parsley, R.L. (2000) Are homalozoans echinoderms? An answer from the extraxial-axial theory. Paleobiology, 26, 529-555.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0529:AHEAAF>2.0.CO;2
[12] Lefebvre, B. (2000) Homologies in Stylophora: A test of the “calcichordate theory”. Geobios, 33, 359-364.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(00)80163-1
[13] Sumrall, C.D. and Wray, G.A. (2007) Ontogeny in the fossil record: Diversification of body plans and the evolution of “aberrant” symmetry in Paleozoic echinoderms. Paleobiology, 33, 149-163.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1666/06053.1
[14] Smith, A.B., Zamora, S. and Alvaro, J. (2013) The oldest echinoderm faunas from Gondwana show echinoderm body plan diversification was rapid. Natural Community, 4, 1385.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2391
[15] Rozhnov, S.V. (2012) Development of symmetry and asymmetry in the early evolution of the echinoderms. Paleontological Journal, 46, 780-792.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0031030112080114
[16] Rozhnov, S.V. and Jefferies, R.P.S. (1996) A new stemchordate solute from the Middle Ordovician of Estonia. Geobios, 29, 91-109.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(96)80074-X
[17] Rozhnov, S.V. (2012) The anteroposterior axis in echinoderms and displacement of the mouth in their phylogeny and ontogeny. Biology Bulletin, 39, 162-171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1062359012020094
[18] Sprinkle, J. (1973) Morphology and evolution of blastozoan echinoderms. Harvard University Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Special Publication, 1-283.
[19] Rozhnov, S.V. (2002) Morphogenesis and evolution of crinoids and other pelmatozoan echinoderms in the Early Paleozoic. Paleontological Journal, 36, S525-S674.
[20] Hotchkiss, F.H.C. (1998) A “ray-as-appendages” model for the origin of pentamerism in echinoderms. Paleobiology, 24, 200-214.
[21] Minsuk, S.B., Turner, F.R., Andrews, M.E. and Raff, R.A. (2009) Axial patterning of the pentaradial adult echinoderm body plan. Development Genes and Evolution, 219, 89-101.
[22] Sumrall, C.D. and Sprinkle, J. (1998) Phylogenetic analysis of living Echinodermata based on primitive fossil taxa. In: Mooi, R. and Telford, M., Eds., Echinoderms: San Francisco, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield, 81-87.
[23] Bell, B.M. (1975) Ontogeny and systematics of Timeischytes castery, n, sp.: An enigmatic Devonian edrioasteroids. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 67, 33-56.
[24] Bell, B.M. (1976) Phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic development in the class Edrioasteroidea (Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 50, 1001-1019.
[25] Sumrall, C.D. and Sprinkle, J. (1999) Early ontogeny of the glyptocystitid rhombiferan Lepadocystis moorei. In: Carnevali, M.D.C. and Bonasoro, F., Eds., Echinoderm Research, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 409-414.
[26] Sumrall, C.D. and Shumacher, G.A. (2002) Cheirocystis fultonensis, a new glyptocystitoid rhombiferan from the Upper Ordovician of the Cincinnati Arch-comment on cheirocrinid ontogeny. Journal of Paleontology, 76, 843851.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1666/0022-3360(2002)076<0843:CFANGR>2.0.CO;2
[27] Broadhead, T.W. and Sumrall, C.D. (2003) Heterochrony and paedomorphic morphology of Sprinkleocystis ektopios, new genus and species (Rhombifera, Glyptocystida) from the middle Ordovician (Caradoc) of Tennessee. Journal of Paleontology, 77, 113-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1666/0022-3360(2003)077<0113:HAPMOS>2.0.CO;2
[28] Parsley, R.L. and Zhao, Y. (2006) Long stalked eocrinoids in the basal Middle Cambrian Kaili Biota, Taijaing County Guizhou Province, China. Journal of Paleontology, 80, 1058-1071.
[29] Ivanova-Kasas, O.I. (1978) Comparative embryology of invertebrate animals: Echinoderms and hemichordates. Nauka, Moscow, 163 p. [in Russian]
[30] Rozhnov, S.V. (1998b) Crookedness of the stem and crown of pelmatozoan echinoderms as resulting from different kinds of heterochrony. In: Carnevali, M.D.C. and Bonasoro, F., Eds., Echinoderm Research, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 385-390.
[31] Peterson, K.J., Arenas-Mena, C. and Davidson, E.H. (2000) The A/P axis in echinoderm ontogeny and evolution: Evidence from fossils and molecules. Evolution and Development, 2, 93-101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-142x.2000.00042.x
[32] David, B. and Mooi, R. (1998) Major events in the evolution of echinoderms viewed by the light of embryology. In: Mooi, R. and Telford, M., Eds., Echinoderms: San Francisco, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield, 21-28.
[33] Cameron, R.A., Rowen, L., Nesbitt, R., Bloom, S., Rast, J.P., et al. (2006) Unusual gene order and organization of the sea urchin Hox claster. Journal of Experimental Zoology (B), 306, 45-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21070
[34] Mooi, R. and David, B. (2008) Radial symmetry, the anterior/posterior axis, and echinoderm Hox genes. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, Systematic, 39, 43-62.
[35] Holland, N.D. (1988) The meaning of developmental asymmetry for echinoderm evolution: A new interpretation. In: Paul, C.R.C. and Smith, A.B., Eds., Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 13-25.
[36] Zamora, S., Rahman, I.A. and Smith, A.B. (2012) Plated Cambrian bilaterians reveal the earliest stages of echinoderm evolution. PLoS ONE, 7, e38296.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038296
[37] Levin, M. and Palmer, A.R. (2007) Left-right pattering from the inside out: Widespread evidence for intracellular control. BioEssays, 29, 271-287.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20545
[38] Smith, A.B. and Arbizu, M.A. (1987) Inverse larval development in a Devonian edrioasteroid from Spain and the phylogeny of the Agelacrinitidae. Lethaia, 20, 49-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1987.tb00759.x
[39] Rozhnov, S.V. (1998) The left-right asymmetry in echinoderms. In: Mooi, R. and Telford, M., Eds., Echinoderms: San Francisco, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield, 73-78.
[40] Daley, P.E.J. (1996) The first solute which is attached as an adult: A Mid-Cambrian fossil from Utah with echinoderm and chordate affinities. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 117, 403-440.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1996.tb01659.x
[41] Sprinkle, J. and Wilbur, B. (2005) Deconstructing helicoplacoids: Reinterpreting the most enigmatic Cambrian Echinoderm. Geological Journal, 40, 281-293.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gj.1015
[42] Rozhnov, S.V. (2009) Development of the trophic structure of Vendian and Early Paleozoic marine communities. Paleontological Journal, 43, 1364-1377.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0031030109110021
[43] Rozhnov, S.V. (2010) From Vendian to Cambrian: The beginning of morphological disparity of modern metazoan phyla. Russian Journal of Developmental Biology, 46, 357-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1062360410060032
[44] Rozhnov, S.V., Fedorov, A.B. and Sayutina, T.A. (1992) Lower Cambrian echinoderms from the territory of the USSR. Paleontological Journal, 1, 53-66.
[45] Smith, A.B. (1999) Dating the origin of metazoan body plans. Evolution and Development, 1, 138-142.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-142x.1999.99027.x
[46] Swalla, B.J. and Smith, A.B. (2008) Deciphering deuterostome phylogeny: Molecular, morphological and palaeontological perspectives. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society (B), 363, 1557-1568.
[47] Bury, H. (1888) The early stages in the development of Antedon rosacea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London (B), 129, 257-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1888.0010
[48] Chadwick, H.C. (1907) Antedon. Proceedings and Transactions of the Liverpool Biological Society, 21, 371-417.
[49] Thompson, W. (1865) On the embryology of Antedon rosaceus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, 155, 513-544.
[50] Moore, R.C. (1962) Ray structures of some inadunate crinoids. The Paleontological Institute, The University of Kansas, Article 5, 1-47.
[51] Moore, R.C. (1940) New genera of Pennsilvanian crinoids from Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas. Bulletin of the Scientific Laboratories of Denison University, 35, 32-54.
[52] Kesling R.V. and Paul C.R.C. (1971) Agostocrinus and Acolocrinus, two new Ordovician crinoids with peculiar ray and respiratory structures. Contributions from the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology, 23, 221-237.
[53] Barrois, J. (1888) Development de la comatule (C. mediterranea). Recueil Zoologique Suisse, 8, 477-484.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.