Complications, imaging results, and midterm clinical outcomes of pipeline embolisation device in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms

Hamed Asadi, Timothy Phillips, Richard Dowling, Bernard Yan, Peter Mitchell

Melbourne Brain Centre, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Neurological Intervention & Imaging Service of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

DOI: 10.4236/wjns.2014.41007                

Abstract

Background: The introduction of pipeline embolisation device (PED) has improved the feasibility of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The device allows for endoluminal reconstruction across the aneurysm neck but is permeable enough that flow is preserved across the pressure gradients into sidebranch arteries. In spite of higher rates of aneurysm occlusion, there is lack of data concerning medium to long-term clinical and imaging results. Methods: This study was a prospective single center analysis of complications, imaging results, and medium term clinical outcomes after PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms. We included cases over a 17-month period in a tertiary interventional neuroradiology center. We collected data on demographics, vascular risk factors, clinical presentation, angiographic results post treatment, angiographic follow-up and clinical follow-up. Results: Thirty-three patients were included, 25 females and 8 males, with mean age of 55 years; 3 presented with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage and 30 for elective treatment. Thirty-seven aneurysms were treated: 35 Internal Carotid Artery (ICA), 1 basilar trunk fusiform, and 1 vertebral artery intradural dissecting aneurysms. No deaths have occurred. Five patients suffered transient neurological complications (15%). Overall aneurysm occlusion was demonstrated in 85% of patients at the end of one year. Discussion: Overall, the technique of flow diversion and endoluminal reconstruction differs greatly from the established endosaccular packing techniques of standard coiling, balloon remodeling, or stent assisted coiling. Our midterm follow-up confirms that, the rates of clinically significant complications compare favorably with published data on stent assisted coiling, potentially making these devices a truly revolutionizing technique.

Keywords

Cerebral Aneurysm; Flow Diverting Stents; Pipline Embolisation Device; Endovascular Treatment

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Deutschmann, H.A., Wehrschuetz, M., Augustin, M., et al. (2011) Long-term follow-up after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: Results from a Single Center. American Journal of Neuroradiology.
[2]	Szikora, I., Berentei, Z., Kulcsar, Z., et al. (2010) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: The Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 31, 1139-1147. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2023
[3]	Lylyk, P., Miranda, C., Ceratto, R., et al. (2009) Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: The Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery, 64, 632-642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65
[4]	Nelson, P.K., Lylyk, P., Szikora, I., et al. (2011) The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32, 34-40.
[5]	FDA. (2011) Summary of safety and effectiveness data. pipeline embolization device.
[6]	Fischer, S., Vajda, Z., Aguilar Perez, M., et al. (2011) pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology, 54, 369-382.
[7]	McAuliffe, W. and Wenderoth, J.D. (2011) Immediate and midterm results following treatment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 33, 487-493.
[8]	McAuliffe, W., Wycoco, V., Rice, H., et al. (2012) Immediate and Midterm Results following Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 33, 164-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2727
[9]	Velat, G.J., Fargen, K.M., Lawson, M.F., et al. (2011) Delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage following pipeline embolization device treatment for a giant recanalized ophthalmic aneurysm. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.
[10]	Cruz, J.P., Chow, M., O’Kelly, C., et al. (2012) Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 33, 603-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3065
[11]	Kallmes, D.F., Ding, Y.H., Dai, D., et al. (2009) A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 30, 1153-1158. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1530
[12]	Fiorella, D., Lylyk, P., Szikora, I., et al. (2009) Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the pipeline embolization device: The emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 1, 56-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnis.2009.000083
[13]	Fiorella, D., Woo, H.H., Albuquerque, F.C., et al. (2008) Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery, 62, 1115-1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000325873.44881.6e
[14]	Oncel, D., Oncel, G., Karaca, M. (2007) Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: Determination with 64section multidetector CT coronary angiography—Initial Experience1. Radiology, 242, 403-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422060065
[15]	de Barros Faria, M., Castro, R.N., Lundquist, J., et al. (2011) The role of the pipeline embolization device for the treatment of dissecting intracranial aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2671
[16]	Lubicz, B., Collignon, L., Raphaeli, G., et al. (2011) Pipeline flow-diverter stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Preliminary experience in 20 patients with 27 aneurysms. World Neurosurgery, 76, 114-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.015
[17]	Aurboonyawat, T., Schmidt, P.J., Piotin, M., et al. (2011) A study of the first-generation pipeline embolization device morphology using intraoperative angiographic computed tomography (ACT). Neuroradiology, 53, 23-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0709-2
[18]	Hauck, E.F., Natarajan, S.K., Langer, D.J., et al. (2010) Retrograde trans-posterior communicating artery snareassisted rescue of lost access to a foreshortened pipeline embolization device: Complication management. Neurosurgery, 67, 495-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f8530d
[19]	Martin, A.R., Pablo Cruz, J., Matouk, C.C., et al. (2011) The Pipeline flow-diverting stent for exclusion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with difficult morphologies. Neurosurgery, 70, 21-28.
[20]	Fiorella, D., Albuquerque, F.C., Woo, H., et al. (2010) Neuroform stent assisted aneurysm treatment: Evolving treatment strategies, complications and results of longterm follow-up. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2, 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnis.2009.000521
[21]	Mocco, J., Snyder, K.V., Albuquerque, F.C., et al. (2009) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Enterprise stent: a multicenter registry. Journal of Neurosurgery, 110, 35-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2008.7.JNS08322
[22]	Spiotta, A.M., Gupta, R., Fiorella, D., et al. (2011) Midterm results of endovascular coiling of wide-necked aneurysms using double stents in a Y configuration. Neurosurgery, 69, 421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318214abbd
[23]	Puffer, R.C., Kallmes, D.F., Cloft, H.J. and Lanzino, G. (2012) Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. Journal of Neurosurgery, 116, 892-896.
[24]	Pistocchi, S., Blanc, R., Bartolini, B., et al. (2012) Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke, 43, 1032-1038. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019
[25]	Charles, R. (2010) Normal and abnormal embryology and development of the intracranial vascular system. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 21, 399-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2010.03.011
[26]	Klisch, J., Turk, A., Turner, R., et al. (2011) Very late thrombosis of flow-diverting constructs after the treatment of large fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32, 627-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2571
[27]	Fiorella, D., Hsu, D., Woo, H.H., et al. (2010) Very late thrombosis of a pipeline embolization device construct: Case report. Neurosurgery, 67, onsE313-314; discussion onsE314.
[28]	van Rooij, W.J. and Sluzewski, M. (2010) Perforator infarction after placement of a pipeline flow-diverting stent for an unruptured A1 aneurysm. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 31, E43-E44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2034
[29]	Nadarajah, M., Power, M., Barry, B., et al. (2011) Treatment of a traumatic carotid? cavernous fistula by the sole use of a flow diverting stent. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.
[30]	Turowski, B., Macht, S., Kulcsar, Z., et al. (2011) Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): Do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology, 53, 37-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0676-7
[31]	Kulcsar, Z., Houdart, E., Bonafe, A., et al. (2011) Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32, 20-25.
[32]	Cloft, H.J. (2011) Flow diversion for cerebral aneurysms: A cautionary tale. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32, 26.
[33]	Szikora, I., Berentei, Z., Kulcsar, Z., et al. (2010) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: The budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 31, 1139-1147.
[34]	McAuliffe, W., Wycoco, V., Rice, H., et al. (2011) Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 33, 164-170.
[35]	Lubicz, B., Collignon, L., Raphaeli, G., et al. (2010) Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke, 41, 2247-2253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589911
[36]	Kulcsar, Z., Ernemann, U., Wetzel, S.G., et al. (2010) High-profile flow diverter (silk) implantation in the basilar artery: Efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke, 41, 1690-1696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.580308
[37]	Byrne, J.V., Beltechi, R., Yarnold, J.A., et al. (2010) Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: A multicentre prospective study. PLoS ONE, 5, e12492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012492