Feasibility study for genetic testing and SNP analysis in infants

DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2014.42010   PDF   HTML     3,839 Downloads   4,850 Views  

Abstract

Purpose: Determine whether parents would consent to genotyping for temperament characteristics for their infants; establish that quality DNA is obtained from infants using a cheek swab. Design and Methods: Seventeen mother-father dyads and infants, 11 to 35 weeks of age, who had participated in a GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease) massage study participated in this feasibility study. Results: Seventy-one percent of parents agreed to genotyping. Most parents who participated were concurrently enrolled in the GERD massage study. Reasons provided for participating were support of research and the desire to help other families who had infants with GERD. Parents who participated also had higher educational attainment than those who declined. Reasons for declining were dislike of genetic research. All samples could be analyzed. Practice Implications. Many par-ents allowed genotyping, especially if currently engaged with research staff. Cheek swabs are a noninvasive and satisfactory method of DNA collection.

Share and Cite:

Neu, M. , Ehringer, M. and Marcheggiani-Howard, C. (2014) Feasibility study for genetic testing and SNP analysis in infants. Open Journal of Nursing, 4, 67-73. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2014.42010.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Nelson, S.P., Chen, E.H., Syniar, G.M. and Christoffel, K.K. (1997) Prevalence of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux during infancy. A pediatric practice-based survey. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 151, 569-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.154.2.150
[2] Sherman, P.M., Hassall, E., Fagundes-Neto, U., Gold, B.D., Kato, S., Koletzko, S. and Vandenplas, Y. (2009) A global, evidence-based consensus on the definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the pediatric population. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 104, 1278-1295.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.129
[3] Condino, A.A., Sondheimer, J., Pan, Z., Gralla, J., Perry, D. and O’Connor, J. (2006) Evaluation of infantile acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux using combined pH monitoring and impedance measurement. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 42, 16-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mpg.0000188008.66752.72
[4] Jordan, B., Heine, R.G., Meehan, M., Catto-Smith, A.G. and Lubitz, L. (2006) Effect of antireflux medication, placebo and infant mental health intervention on persistent crying: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 42, 49-58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00786.x
[5] Moore, D.J., Tao, B.S., Lines, D.R., Hirte, C., Heddle, M.L. and Davidson, G.P. (2003) Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of omeprazole in irritable infants with gastroesophageal reflux. Journal of Pediatrics, 143, 219-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00207-5
[6] Neu, M., Corwin, E., Lareau, S.C. and Marchegianni-Howard, C. (2011) A review of nonsurgical treatment for the symptom of irritability in infants with GERD. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 17, 177-192.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00310.x
[7] De Luca, A., Rizzardi, M., Buccino, A., Alessandroni, R., Salvioli, G.P., Filograsso, N. and Dallapiccola, B. (2003) Association of dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) exon III repeat polymorphism with temperament in 3-year-old infants. Neurogenetics, 4, 207-212.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10048-003-0146-z
[8] Ebstein, R.P., Levine, J., Geller, V., Auerbach, J., Gritsenko, I. and Belmaker, R.H. (1998) Dopamine D4 receptor and serotonin transporter promoter in the determination of neonatal temperament. Molecular Psychiatry, 3, 238-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00669.x
[9] Kim, S.J., Kim, Y.S., Lee, H.S., Kim, S.Y. and Kim, C.H. (2006) An interaction between the serotonin transporter promoter region and dopamine transporter polymorphisms contributes to harm avoidance and reward dependence traits in normal healthy subjects. Journal of Neural Transmission, 113, 877-886.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-006-0444-3
[10] Posner, M.I. and Rothbart, M.K. (2009) Toward a physical basis of attention and self-regulation. Physics of Life Reviews, 6, 103-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2009.02.001
[11] Sheese, B.E., Voelker, P., Posner, M.I. and Rothbart, M.K. (2009) Genetic variation influences on the early development of reactive emotions and their regulation by attention. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 14, 332-355.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546800902844064
[12] Arain, M., Campbell, M.J., Cooper, C.L. and Lancaster, G.A. (2010) What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 67.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-67
[13] Borry, P., Stultiens, L., Nys, H., Cassiman, J.J. and Dieridkx, K. (2006) Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in monors: A systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Clinical Genetics, 70, 374-381.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00692.x
[14] Laegsgaard, M.M., Kristensen, A.S. and Mors, O. (2009) Potential consumers’ attitudes toward psychiatric genetic research and testing and factors influencing their intentions to test. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomakers, 13, 57-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2008.0022
[15] Jenkins, M., Reed-Gross, E., Barfield, W.D., Prue, C.E. Gallagher, M.L., Rasmussen, S.A. and Honein, M.A. (2011) Qualitative assessment of study materials and communication strategies used in studies that include DNA collection. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
[16] Botkin, J.R. (2010) Informed consent for genetic research. Current Protocols in Human Genetics, Chap 1.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471142905.hg0116s66
[17] Neidich, A.B., Joseph, J.W., Ober, C. and Ross, L.F. (2008) Empirical data about women’s attitude towards a hypothetical pediatric biobank. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 146, 297-304.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32145
[18] Mathisen, B., Worrall, L., Masel, J., Wall, C. and Shepherd, R.W. (1999) Feeding problems in infants with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: A controlled study. Journal of Pediatric Child Health, 35, 163-169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1754.1999.t01-1-00334.x
[19] Rasmussen, S.A., Lammer, E.J., Shaw, G.M., Finnell, R.H., McGhee Jr., R.E., Gallagher, M. and Murray, J.C. (2002) Integeration of DNA sample collection into a multi-site birth defects case-control study. Teratology, 66, 177-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tera.10086
[20] Erickson, S.W., MacLoed, S.L. and Hobbs, C.A. (2012) Cheek swabs, SNP chips, and CNVs: assessing the quality of copy number variant calls generated with subject-collected mail-in buccal brush DNA samples on a high density genotyping microarray. BMC Medical Genetics, 13, 13-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-13-51
[21] Lehmann, A.S., Hass, D.M., McCormick, C.L., Skaar, T.C. and Renbarger, J.L. (2011) Collection of human genomic DNA from neonates: A comparison between umbilical cord blood and buccal swabs. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 204, 362, e1-e6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.013
[22] Anchordoquy, H.C., McGeary, C., Liu, L., Krauter, K.S. and Smolen, A. (2003) Genotyping of three candidate genes after whole-genome preamplification of DNA collected from buccal cells. Behavioral Genetics, 33, 73-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021007701808
[23] Hoft, N.R., Stitzel, J.A., Hutchison, K.E. and Ehringer, M.A. (2011) CHRNB2 promoter region: Association with subjective effects to nicotine and gene expression differences. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 10, 176-185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00650.x
[24] Lewis, R. (2011) Human genetics: Concepts and applications. 10th Edition, McGraw Hill, New York.
[25] Saldana, S.N., Hooper, D.K., Froehlich, T.E., Campbell, K.M., Prows, C.A., Sadhasivam, S. and Glauser, T.A. (2011). Characteristics of successful recruitment in prospective pediatric pharmacogenetic studies. Clinical Therapeutics, 33, 2072-2081.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.10.026
[26] Wilson, P.M., Brooke, F., Procter, S. and Kendall, S. (2012) The nursing contribution to chronic disease management: A case of public expectation? Qualitative findings from multiple case study design in England and Wales. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49, 2-14.
[27] McQuillan, G.M., Pan, Q. and Porter, K.S. (2006) Consent for genetic research in a general population: An update on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey experience. Genetics in Medicine, 8, 354-360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2010.106
[28] Peppercorn, J., Shapira, J., Deshields, T., Kroetz, D., Friedman. P., Spears, P. and Bertagnolli, M.M. (2012) Ethical aspects of participation in the database of genotypes and phenotypes of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Cancer, 118, 5060-5068.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27515
[29] Wilde, A., Mitchell, P.B., Meiser, B. and Schofield, P.R. (2012) Implications of the use of use of genetic tests in psychiatry, with a focus on major depressive disorder: A review. Depression and Anxiety, 30, 1-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.22000
[30] Barnoy, S., Ofra, L. and Bar-Tal, Y. (2012) What makes patients perceive their health care worker as an epistemic authority? Nursing Inquiry, 1, 128-133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00562.x
[31] Morren, M., Rijken, M., Baanders, A.N. and Bensing, J. (2007) Perceived genetic knowledge, attitudes toward genetic testing, and the relationship between these among patients with a chronic disease. Patient Educational Counseling Journal, 65, 197-204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.07.005
[32] Sziller, I., Hupuczi, P., Normand, N., Halmose, A., Pupp, Z. and Witkin, S.S. (2006) Fas (TNFRSF6) gene polymorphism in pregnant women with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets and in their neonates. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 107, 582-587.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000195824.51919.81

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.