Making Every Dollar Count: Local Government Expenditures and Welfare

Pedro V. Garay, Yacob A. Zereyesus, Alexi Thompson

Department of Agricultural Economics, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, USA.
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/me.2014.51010                

Abstract

The paper aims at examining the relationship between the allocations of funds at the local government level and the economic well-being of citizens. The results of this study help shed light on ways to get the best out of every dollar spent by local governments. Three empirical proxy measures for citizen well-being were used in the estimation of three different panel data models. Results suggest that some types of government expenditure can have a positive influence on citizen well-being. The analysis provides insights into how economic development policies may be conceived by local governments to ensure sustained economic prosperity of its citizens.

Keywords

Local Government; Expenditure; Well-Being

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	T. L. Hungerford, “The Effects of Government Expenditures and Revenues on the Economy and Economic WellBeing: A Cross-National Analysis,” CRS Report for Congress, 2006.
[2]	S. Gupta, M. Verhoeven and E. R. Tiongson, “Public Spending on Health Care and the Poor,” Health Economic, Vol. 12, No. 8, 2003, pp. 685-696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.759
[3]	L. Kenworthy, “Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment,” Social Forces, Vol. 77, No. 3, 1999, pp. 1119-1139.
[4]	S. Fan, P. Hazell and S. Thorat, “Government Spending, Growth and Poverty in Rural India,” American Journal of Agricultural Economic, Vol. 82, No. 4, 2000, pp. 1038-1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00101
[5]	Federal, State, and Local Governments, “State and Local Government Finances,” US Commerce Department, Washington DC, 2007. http://www.census.gov/govs/www/index.html
[6]	T. M. Smeeding and D. H. Sullivan, “Generations and the Distribution of Economic Well-Being: A Cross-National View,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 2, 1998, pp. 254-258.
[7]	T. M. Smeeding and S. Sandstörm, “Poverty and Income Maintenance in Old Age: A Cross-National View of LowIncome Older Women,” Feminist Economics, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2005, pp. 163-174.
[8]	J. D. Smith and J. N. Morgan, “Variability of Economic Well-Being and Its Determinants,” American Economic Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 1970, pp. 286-295.
[9]	B. D. Proctor and J. Dalaker, “Poverty in the United States: 2002,” US Census Bureau, Washington DC, 2003.
[10]	United States Census Bureau (US Census Bureau), “The Effect of Taxes and Transfers on Income and Poverty in the United States: 2005,” US Department of Commerce, Washington DC, 2007.
[11]	R. A. Easterlin, “Happiness in Economics,” Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2002.
[12]	R. Inglehart, “Cultural Shift in Advanced Industrial Society,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1990.
[13]	A. Wald, “A Note on Regression Analysis,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1947, pp. 586-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730350
[14]	C. Hildreth and J. P. Houck, “Some Estimators for a Linear Model with Random Coefficients,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 63, No. 322, 1968, pp. 584-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2284029
[15]	P. A. V. B. Swamy, “Statistical Inference in Random Coefficient Regression Models and Its Applications in Economics,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1967, pp. 1941-1947.
[16]	P. A. V. B. Swamy, “Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model,” Econometrica, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1970, pp. 311-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1913012
[17]	T. S. Breusch and A. R. Pagan, “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 47, No. 1, 1980, pp. 239-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2297111
[18]	J. A. Hausman, “Specification Tests in Econometrics,” Econometrica, Vol. 46, No. 6, 1978, pp. 1251-1271. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1913827