The Legacy of Margaret Thatcher—A Critical Assessment

Paul Stepney

University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2014.21013                

Abstract

The recent death of Margaret Thatcher sparked some very strong and divided opinions throughout Europe, United States and across the globe. Her death made headline news, such was her notoriety as a person who not only sought to change history but was instrumental in reshaping it especially during the 1980s and 1990s. Although Thatcher may have passed away, the ideas underpinning Thatcherism are alive and well, and importantly, continue to exert a decisive influence on the wider political and economic landscape. The heart of Thatcher legacy is a fundamental contradiction neatly exposed by the current global economic crisis. Thatcherism, with its belief in the efficacy of the market and determination to roll back the frontiers of the state, ought to have been thoroughly discredited given that deregulation of the financial markets has led to many of today’s problems. However, despite the financial crisis requiring massive government bailouts on an unprecedented scale, neoliberal thinking in the best Thatcherite traditions continues unabated. This is the paradox of Thatcherism. Now several months after her funeral is an appropriate time to make a rational assessment of her legacy, noting her achievements alongside the bitter controversy about the highly individualistic and divided society she helped to create.

Keywords

Thatcherism; Individualism; Neoliberalism; Privatization; Nationalism

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Krugman, P. (2013) How the case for Austerity has crumbled. The New York Review of Books.
[2]	Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (2012) The alchemy of austerity. Critical Social Policy, 32, 299-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018312444405
[3]	Jenkins, S. (2013) Ignore the howls. If bankers leave it would be no great loss. The Guardian, 6 March, 30.
[4]	Lillelien, B. (1981) Youtube video commentary in the aftermath of Norway’s victory over England in Oslo in 1981. http://youtube.com/watch?v=PqZTP8-8wIs
[5]	Nasqvi, S. (2013) Can you be a Tory and a social worker? Professional Social Work, March 2013, 24-25.
[6]	Hitchens, P. (2013) Let’s remember Maggie for what she really was… a tragic failure. The Mail on Sunday, 14 April, 35. http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2013/04/lets-remember-maggie-for-what-she-really-was-a-tragic-failure.html
[7]	Stepney, P. (2012) An overview of the wider policy context. In: Stepney, P. and Ford, D., Eds., Social Work Models, Methods and Theories, 2nd Edition, Russell House, Lyme Regis, 1-19.
[8]	Paine, T. (1791) The rights of man. Joseph Johnson of Fleet Street, London.
[9]	O’Hagan, A. (2013) Maggie. The New York Review of Books, 9, 18-20.
[10]	Klein, R. (2013) The new politics of the NHS. 7th Edition, Radcliffe Publishing, Milton Keynes, 67-73.
[11]	Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
[12]	Segal, L. (2013) Thatcher—Neoliberalism’s “willing tool”, Verso Blog. http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/1278-thatcher-neoliberalism-s-willing-tool
[13]	Braverman, H. (1974) Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. Monthly Review Press, New York.
[14]	Orwell, G. (1937) The road to Wigan pier. Gollancz for the Left Book Club, London.