Share This Article:

The Readability of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Anesthesiology Associations and the American Society of Anesthesiologists

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:1319KB) PP. 1-7
DOI: 10.4236/ojanes.2014.41001    4,161 Downloads   5,925 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Background: As much as 80% of US adults search online for health related information. The value of the information is limited by the patients’ ability to comprehend it. Despite the recommendation by the American Medical Association (AMA) to provide all patient education materials (PEMs) at a 6th grade reading level, many online sources do not conform. This study aims to evaluate the readability of PEMs from major online sources for anesthesiology. Methods: We determined the readability of PEMs from five major anesthesiology organizations and twelve brochures from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) using ten validated readability scales. PEMs from the various anesthesiology websites were compiled into a single word document for analysis. The twelve patient education brochures from the ASA were downloaded and analyzed separately. We then grouped the twelve documents into one sample and compared it to the other anesthesiology association websites. Results: All of the PEMs provided by the ASA were determined to be higher than a 6th grade reading level with nine being at a 12th grade reading level or above. The PEMs of the five major anesthesiology association websites were beyond the 6th grade reading level with four out of five at greater than the 12th grade reading level. Conclusion: The results showed that the readability of PEMs provided by five major anesthesiology associations and the ASA was beyond the 6th grade. Therefore, the PEMs with improved readability in anesthesiology are needed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

L. Chinn, S. McGuirt and S. Puri, "The Readability of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Anesthesiology Associations and the American Society of Anesthesiologists," Open Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2014, pp. 1-7. doi: 10.4236/ojanes.2014.41001.

References

[1] S. Fox, “Online Health Search,” 2006.
http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Online_Health_2006.pdf
[2] S. Fox and S. Jones, “The Social Life of Internet Users,” Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington DC, 2009.
[3] “Mobile Health Information Audience Jumps 125 Percent in the Past Year,” 2012.
http://www.comscoredatamine.com/2012/01/mobile-health-information-audience-jumps-125-percent-in-the-past-year/
[4] G. M. Edward, N. V. D. Nald, F. J. Oort, H. C. J. M. de Haes, J. D. Biervliet, M. W. Hollman, et al., “Information Gain in Patients Using a Multimedia Website with Tailored Information on Anesthesia,” British Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 106, No. 3, 2011, pp. 319-324.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq360
[5] B. D. Weis, “Health Literacy: A Manual for Clinicians,” American Medical Association, American Medical Foundation, Chicago, 2003.
[6] NCES, “America’s Health Literacy: Why We Need Accessible Health Information,” US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington DC, 2008.
[7] J. A. Eloy, S. Li, K. Kasabwala, N. Agarwal, D. R. Hansberry, S. Baredes, et al., “Readability Assessment of Patient Education Materials on Major Otolaryngology Association Websites,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 147, No. 5, 2012, pp. 848-854.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599812456152
PMid:22864405.
[8] K. Kasabwala, N. Agarwal, D. R. Hansberry, S. Baredes and J. A. Eloy, “Readability Assessment of Patient Education Materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 147, No. 3, 2012, pp. 466-471.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599812442783
[9] K. Kasabwala, P. Misra, D. R. Hansberry, N. Argarwal, S. Baredes, M. Setzen, et al., “Readability Assessment of the American Rhinologic Society Patient Education Materials,” International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2012, pp. 325-333.
[10] Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, “Health Literacy: Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 281, No. 6, 1999, pp. 552-557.
[11] R. Flesch, “A New Readability Yardstick,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1948, pp. 221-233.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
[12] J. P. Kincaid, et al., “Derivation of New Readability Formulas: (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel,” Chief of Naval Technical Training, Naval Air Station Memphis, Millington, Springfield, Distributed by NTIS, 1975.
[13] M. Coleman and T. L. Liau, “A Computer Readability Formula Designed for Machine Scoring,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 60, No. 2, 1975, pp. 283-284.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076540
[14] R. Gunning, “The Technique of Clear Writing,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1952.
[15] G. H. McLaughlin, “SMOG Grading: A New Readability Formula,” Journal of Reading, Vol. 12, 1969, pp. 639-646.
[16] J. S. Caylor, T. G. Sticht, L. C. Fox and J. P. Ford, “Methodologies for Determining Reading Requirements of Military Occupational Specialties” Technical Report No. 73-5, Human Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, Virginia, 1973.
[17] J. S. Chall, “Readability Revisited: The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula,” Brookline Books, Cambridge, 1995.
[18] A. L. Raygor, “The Raygor Readability Estimate: A Quick and Easy Way to Determine Difficulty,” In: P. D. Pearson, Ed., Reading: Theory Rap, ed. National Reading Conference, Clemson, 1977, pp. 259-263.
[19] E. Fry, “A Readability Formula That Saves Time,” Journal of Reading, Vol. 11, No. 7, 1968, pp. 513-516, 575-578.
[20] R. T. Penson, R. C. Benson, K. Parles, B. Chabner and T. Lynch Jr., “Virtual Connections: Internet Health Care,” The Oncologist, Vol. 7, No. 6, 2002, pp. 555-568.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.7-6-555
[21] S. Badarudeen and S. Sabharwal, “Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials: Current Role in Orthopaedics,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 468, No. 10, 2010, pp. 2572-2580.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1380-y
[22] A. R. Jadad and A. Gagliardi, “Rating Health Information on the Internet: Navigating to Knowledge or to Babel?” The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 279, No. 8, 1998, pp. 611-614.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.8.611
[23] G. Eysenbach and T. L. Diepgen, “Towards Quality Management of Medical Information on the Internet: Evaluation, Labeling, and Filtering of Information,” BMJ, Vol. 317, No. 7171, 1998, pp. 1496-1500.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7171.1496
[24] M. Colaco, P. F. Svider, N. Agarwal, J. A. Eloy and I. M. Jackson, “Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials,” The Journal of Urology, Vol. 189, No. 3, 2013, pp. 1048-1052.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.255
[25] P. Misra, K. Kasabwala, N. Agarwal, J. Eloy and J. Liu, “Readability Analysis of Internet-Based Patient Information Regarding Skull Base Tumors,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Vol. 109, No. 3, 2012, pp. 573-580.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0930-4
[26] C. R. Patel, D. V. Cherla, S. Sanghvi, S. Baredes and J. A. Eloy, “Readability Assessment of Online Thyroid Surgery Patient Education Materials,” Head & Neck, Vol. 35, No. 10, 2013, pp. 1421-1425.
[27] S. Sanghvi, D. V. Cherla, P. A. Shukla and J. A. Eloy, “Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Related to Facial Fractures,” The Laryngoscope, Vol. 122, No. 9, 2012, pp. 1943-1948.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.23424
[28] P. F. Svider, N. Agarwal, O. J. Choudhry, A. F. Hajart, S. Baredes, J. K. Liu, et al., “Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials From Academic Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Departments,” American Journal of Otolaryngology, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2013, pp. 31-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.08.001
[29] O. Aliu and K. C. Chung, “Readability of ASPS and ASAPS Educational Web Sites: An Analysis of Consumer Impact,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 125, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1271-1278.
[30] S. Kandula and Q. Zeng-Treitler, “Creating a Gold Standard for the Readability Measurement of Health Texts,” In: AMIA 2008 Fall Symposium, Washington DC, 2008, pp. 353-357.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.