Proactive solutions to academic dishonesty

Susan B. Thornock

Weber State University, Ogden, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2013.38075                

Abstract

One of the significant individualities of web-enhanced education is the lack of face-to-face interaction between the student and the educator. A consideration in web-enhanced education which has the probability for ethical concern related to the physical disconnection of instructor and learner is the increased potential for academic dishonesty. This can present a dilemma for nurse educators involved in teaching a difficult curriculum, while it can be motivated to improve the quality and student outcomes related to safe patient-centered care. The most blatant consideration in this setting is plagiarism. This article reviews the various facets of this ethical issue and suggests proactive solutions for faculty and administration to deter academic dishonesty.

Keywords

Academic Dishonesty; Plagiarism; Web-Enhanced; Safe Patient-Centered Care; Proactive Solutions

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Jones, L.R. (2011) Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74, 141-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1080569911404059
[2]	Hall, S.E. (2011) Is it Happening? How to avoid the deleterious effects of plagiarism and cheating in your courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 74, 179-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1080569911404057
[3]	Wideman, M. (2011) Caring or collusion? Academic dishonesty in a school of nursing. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41, 28-43.
[4]	Austin, Z., Simpson, S. and Reynen, E. (2005) The fault lies not in our students, but in ourselves: Academic honesty and moral development in health professions education—Results of a pilot study in Canadian pharmacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 143-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1356251042000337918
[5]	Power, L.G. (2009) University students’ perception of plagiarism. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 643-662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0073
[6]	(2011) Quality and safety education for nurses. Quality and safety competencies. http://www.QSEN.org/competencies.php
[7]	Robinia, K.A. and Anderson, M.L. (2010) Online teaching efficacy of nurse faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 26, 168-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.02.006
[8]	Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G. and Gelmon, S.B. (2009) Improving quality and safety education: The QSEN learning collaborative. Nursing Outlook, 57, 304-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2009.09.004
[9]	Wilson, B.G. (2004) Designing e-learning environments for flexible activity and instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 77-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02504720
[10]	Enlow, M, Shanks, L., Guhde, J. and Perkins, M. (2010) Incorporating interprofessional communication skills (ISBARR) into an undergraduate nursing curriculum. Nurse Educator, 35, 176-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181e339ac
[11]	Taylor, L.A., Hudson, K., Vazzano, J., Naumann, P. and Neal, M. (2010) The electronic health record meets baccalaureate nursing curriculum: Stories from the battlefield. Nurse Leader, 8, 40-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2010.03.008
[12]	Howard, R.M. and Davis, L.J. (2009) Plagiarism in the internet age. Educational Leadership, 66, 64-67.
[13]	Baggaley, J. and Spencer, B. (2005) The mind of a plagiarist. Learning Media and Technology, 30, 55-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13581650500075587
[14]	Sikes, P. (2009) Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft and collision in academic research writing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32, 13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17437270902749247
[15]	Nealy, C. (2011) Rethinking plagiarism. Business Communication Quarterly, 74, 205-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1080569911404056
[16]	Bretag, T. and Mahmud, S. (2009) A model for determining student plagiarism: Electronic detection and academic judgment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 6, Article 6.
[17]	McKeever, L. (2006) Online plagiarism detection services—Savior or scourge? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 155-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262460
[18]	Ledwith, A. and Risquez, A. (2008) Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 371-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070802211562
[19]	Chao, C., Wilhelm, W.J. and Neureuther, B.D. (2009) A study of electronic detection and pedagogical approaches for reducing plagiarism. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 51, 31-42.
[20]	Price, M. (2002) Beyond “gotcha!” Situating plagiarism in policy and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 54, 88-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1512103
[21]	Belter, R.W. and duPre, A. (2009) A strategy to reduce plagiarism in an undergraduate course. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 257-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00986280903173165
[22]	Bolkan, J.V. (2006) Avoid the plague: Tips and tricks for preventing and detecting plagiarism. Learning & Leading with Technology, 33, 10-13.