Performance Evaluation of Heat Exchangers in OTEC Using Ammonia/Water Mixture as Working Fluid

Takafumi Morisaki, Yasuyuki Ikegami

Institute of Ocean Energy, Saga University, Saga, Japan.

DOI: 10.4236/ojfd.2013.34037                

Abstract

The ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) system is a promising solution to provide stable electricity supply. Although the available temperature difference in OTEC systems is small, an ammonia/water mixture as working fluid is expected to decrease irreversible losses in the heat exchangers and to improve system performance. However, in actual heat exchangers, an adequate temperature crossing does not occur in the condenser but in the evaporator. Therefore, clarification of this characteristic is important. To date, the logarithmic temperature difference (LMTD) method is used in performance evaluations of OTEC heat exchangers. This method is of limited use if physical properties of fluids vary. A generalized mean temperature difference (GMTD) method is introduced to perform this evaluation. As changes in fluid property values can be considered in the GMTD method, method dependencies on heat exchanger characteristics, effectiveness, and system characteristics can be studied. In particular, GMTD and LMTD using a pure substance were found to be almost equal. Mean temperature differences using mixtures as working fluid were higher in the evaporator, but lower in the condenser, from the GMTD method than from the LMTD method. For higher ammonia concentrations in ammonia/water mixtures, the mean temperature differences from both methods are different.

Keywords

Ammonia/Water Mixture; Evaporation and Condensation Pressure; OTEC; GMTD; LMTD

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	A. H. A. William and W. Chih, “Renewable Energy from the Ocean: A Guide to OTEC,” Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.
[2]	Y. Ikegami and H. Uehara, “Conceptual Design of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) Power Plants in Sri Lanka,” Proceedings of the 8th International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 1998, pp. 140-148.
[3]	Y. Ikegami and H. Uehara, “Optimum Design Point for a Closed-Cycle OTEC System,” Proceedings of the 4th International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 1994, pp. 383-389.
[4]	F. Sun, Y. Ikegami, B. Jia and H. Arima, “Optimization Design and Exergy Analysis of Organic Rankine Cycle in Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion,” Applied Ocean Research, Vol. 35, 1994, pp. 383-389.
[5]	N. Yamada, A. Hoshi and Y. Ikegami, “Performance Simulation of Solar-Boosted Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Plant,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2009, pp. 1752-1758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.028
[6]	F. Sun, Y. Ikegami and B. Jia, “A Serformance Simulation of Solar-Boosted Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Plant,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 41, 2012, pp. 220-219.
[7]	A. I. Kalina, “Generation of Energy by Means of a Working Fluid, and Regeneration of a Working Fluid,” United States Patent 4346561, 1982.
[8]	H. Uehara and Y. Ikegami, “Parametric Performance Analysis of Otec Using Kalina Cycle,” ASME, 1993, pp. 203-207.
[9]	H. Uehara, Y. Ikegami and T. Nishida, “Performance Analysis of OTEC System Using a Cycle with Absorption and Extraction Processes,” Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Series B, 64-624, 1998, pp. 384-389.
[10]	G. Wall, C. C. Chuang and M. Ishida, “Exergy Study of the Kalina Cycle,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 10-15, 1989.
[11]	Y. M. El-Sayed and M. A. Tribud, “Theoretical Comparison of the Rankine and Kalina cycles,” ASME Publication, 1, 1985, pp. 97-102.
[12]	V. P. Pall and L. Eliasson, “Factors Influencing the Economics of the Kalina Power Cycle and Situations of Superior Performance,” International Geothermal Conference, 2003, pp. 32-40.
[13]	M. D. Mirolli, “Cementing Kalina Cycle Effectiveness, the Kalina Cycle for Cement Kiln Waste-Heat-Recovery Power Plants,” IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2006, pp. 60-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIA.2006.1678332
[14]	U. R. Nasruddin, M. Rifaldi and A. Noor, “Energy and Exergy Analysis of Kalina Cycle System (KCS) 34 with Mass Fraction Ammonia-Water Mixture Variation,” Mechnical Science and Technology, Vol. 23, No. 7, 2009, pp. 1871-1876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-0617-8
[15]	Z. Guzovic, D. Loncar and N. Ferdelji, “Possibilities of Electricity Generation in the Republic of Croatia by Means of Geothermal Energy,” Energy, Vol. 35, No. 8, 2010, pp. 3429-3440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.036
[16]	K. E. Starling, D. W. Johnson, H. Hafezzadeh, L. W. Fish, H. H. West and K. Iqbal, “Use of Mixtures as Working Fluids in Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Cycles— Phase I,” US DOE Report, 1974.
[17]	K. E. Starling, D. W. Johnson, H. Hafezzadeh, L. W. Fish, H. H. West and K. Iqbal, “Use of Mixtures as Working Fluids in Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Cycles— Phase II,” US DOE Report, 1978.
[18]	C. B. Panchal, D. L. Hillis, J. J. Lorenz and D. T. Yung, “OTEC Performance Tests of the Trane Plate-Fin Heat Exchanger,” Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Program Argonne National Laboratory, 1981.
[19]	Y. Ikegami, H. Goto, T. Morisaki and T. Furukawa, “Effect of Working Fluid Flow Rate and Ammonia Concentration on OTEC Using Ammonia/Water Mixture as Working Fluid,” 13th Asian Congress of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, pp. 1026-1029.
[20]	Y. Ikegami, K. Urata, J. Inadomi, H. Goto, T. Morisaki, K. Inoue and S. Goto, “Investigation on the Stability of OTEC System Using Ammonia/Water Mixture as Working Fluid by Continuous Operation for Two Weeks,” Proceedings of the 20th International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 2010.
[21]	M. Utamura, K. Nikitin and Y. Kato, “Generalization of Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference Method for Heat Exchanger Performance Analysis,” Thermal Science & Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2007, pp. 163-172.
[22]	PROPATH Group, “A Program Package of Thermo-Physical Properties of Fluids, Version 11.1,” PROPATH Group.