Comparison of Calibration Curve Method and Partial Least Square Method in the Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Quantitative Analysis

DOI: 10.4236/jcc.2013.17004   PDF   HTML     4,104 Downloads   6,141 Views   Citations


The Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) is a fast, non-contact, no sample preparation analytic technology; it is very suitable for on-line analysis of alloy composition. In the copper smelting industry, analysis and control of the copper alloy concentration affect the quality of the products greatly, so LIBS is an efficient quantitative analysis tech- nology in the copper smelting industry. But for the lead brass, the components of Pb, Al and Ni elements are very low and the atomic emission lines are easily submerged under copper complex characteristic spectral lines because of the matrix effects. So it is difficult to get the online quantitative result of these important elements. In this paper, both the partial least squares (PLS) method and the calibration curve (CC) method are used to quantitatively analyze the laser induced breakdown spectroscopy data which is obtained from the standard lead brass alloy samples. Both the major and trace elements were quantitatively analyzed. By comparing the two results of the different calibration method, some useful results were obtained: both for major and trace elements, the PLS method was better than the CC method in quantitative analysis. And the regression coefficient of PLS method is compared with the original spectral data with background interference to explain the advantage of the PLS method in the LIBS quantitative analysis. Results proved that the PLS method used in laser induced breakdown spectroscopy was suitable for simultaneous quantitative analysis of different content elements in copper smelting industry.

Share and Cite:

Cong, Z. , Sun, L. , Xin, Y. , Li, Y. and Qi, L. (2013) Comparison of Calibration Curve Method and Partial Least Square Method in the Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Computer and Communications, 1, 14-18. doi: 10.4236/jcc.2013.17004.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] [1] J. P. Singh and S. N. Thakur, “Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy,” Elsevier Science B.V., 2007.
[2] A. W. Miziolek, V. Palleschi and I. Schechter, “Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS): Fundamentals and Applications,” Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[3] L. Zimmer, K. Okai and Y. Kurosawa, “Combined Laser Induced Ignition and Plasma Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Application to a Hydrogen Air Combustor,” Spectrochim Acta, Part B, Vol. 62, 2007, pp. 1484-1495.
[4] D. W. Hahn and N. Omenetto, “Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS), Part II: Review of Instrumental and Methodological Approaches to Material Analysis and Applications to Different Fields,” Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 66, 2012, pp. 347-419.
[5] F. Sorrentino, G. Carelli, F. Francesconi, M. Francesconi, P. Marsili, G. Cristoforetti, S. Legnaioli, V. Palleschi and E. Tognoni, “Fast Analysis of Complex Metallic Alloys by Double-Pulse Time-Integrated Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy,” Spectrochim. Acta Part B, Vol. 64, 2009, pp. 1068-1072.
[6] V. Lengard and M. Kermit, “3-Way and 3-Block PLS Regressions in Consumer Preference Analysis,” Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 17, No. 3-4, 2006, pp. 234-242.
[7] A. Krishnan, L. J. Williams, A. R. McIntosh and H. Abdi, “Partial Least Squares (PLS) Methods for Neuroimaging: A Tutorial and Review”, NeuroImage, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2011, pp. 455-475.
[8] Y.H. Chiang, “Using a Combined AHP and PLS Path Modelling on Blog Site Evaluation in Taiwan,” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2013, pp. 1325-1333.
[9] Z. B. Cong, L. X. Sun, Y. Xin, H. Y. Kong and Z. J. Yang, “Determination of Iron, Copper and Silicon in Aluminum Alloys by Laser Induced Break Down Spectroscopy,” Vol. 31, No. 4, 2011, pp. 9-13.
[10] S. Wold, M. Sjöström and L. Eriksson, “PLS-Regression: A Basic Tool of Chemometrics,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2001, pp. 109-130.
[11] J. A. Lopes and J. C. Menezes, “Industrial Fermentation End-Product Modelling with Multilinear PLS,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 68, No. 1-2, 2003, pp. 75-81.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.