Applied methods for studying the relationship between climatic factors and cotton production

DOI: 10.4236/as.2013.411A005   PDF   HTML     3,425 Downloads   6,106 Views   Citations


This study investigates the statistical relationship between climatic variables and aspects of cotton production (G. barbadense), and the effects of climatic factors prevailing prior to flowering or subsequent to boll setting on flower and boll production and retention in cotton. The effects of specific climatic factors during both pre- and post-anthesis periods on boll production and retention are mostly unknown. However, by determining the relationship of climatic factors with flower and boll production and retention, the overall level of production can be possibly predicted. Thus, an understanding of these relationships may help physiologists determine control mechanisms of production in cotton plants. Also, the study covers the predicted effects of climatic factors during convenient intervals (in days) on cotton flower and boll production compared with daily observations. Further, cotton flower and boll production as affected by climatic factors and soil moisture status has been considered. Evaporation, sunshine duration, relative humidity, surface soil temperature at 1800 h, and maximum air temperature, are the important climatic factors that significantly affect flower and boll production. The least important variables were found to be surface soil temperature at 600 h and minimum temperature. The five-day interval was found to be more adequately and sensibly related to yield parameters. Evaporation, minimum humidity and sunshine duration were the most effective climatic factors during preceding and succeeding periods on boll production and retention. There was a negative correlation between flower number and boll production and either evaporation or sunshine duration, while that correlation

with minimum relative humidity was positive. The soil moisture status showed low and insignificant correlation with flower and boll production. Higher minimum relative humidity, short period of sunshine duration, and low temperatures enhanced flower and boll formation.

Share and Cite:

Sawan, Z. (2013) Applied methods for studying the relationship between climatic factors and cotton production. Agricultural Sciences, 4, 37-54. doi: 10.4236/as.2013.411A005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] El-Zik, K.M. (1980) The cotton plant—Its growth and development. Western Cotton Prod. Conf. Summary Proc., Fresno, 18-21.
[2] Guinn, G. (1982) Causes of square and boll shedding in cotton. USDA Tech. Bull. 1672. USDA, Washington, DC.
[3] Hodges, H.F., Reddy, K.R., McKinion, J.M. and Reddy, V.R. (1993) Temperature effects on cotton. Bulletin Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, No. 990, 15.
[4] Xiao, J.-F., Liu, Z.-G., Yu, X.-G., Zhang, J.-Y. and Duan, A.-W. (2000) Effects of different water application on lint yield and fiber quality of cotton under drip irrigation. Acta Gossypii Sinica, 12, 194-197.
[5] Barbour, M.M. and Farquhar, G.D. (2000) Relative humidity- and ABA-induced variation in carbon and oxygen isotope ratios of cotton leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment, 23, 473-485.
[6] Reddy, K.R., Hodges, H.F. and McKinion, J.M. (1995) Carbon dioxide and temperature effects on pima cotton growth. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 54, 17-29.
[7] Schrader, S.M., Wise, R.R., Wacholtz, W.F., Ort, D.R. and Sharkey, T.D. (2004) Thylakoid membrane responses to moderately high leaf temperature in Pima Cotton. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27, 725-735.
[8] Zhou, Z.-G., Meng, Y.-L., Shi Pei, Shen, Y.-Q. and Jia, Z.-K. (2000) Study of the relationship between boll weight in wheat-cotton double cropping and meteorological factors at boll-forming stage. Acta Gossypii Sinica, 12, 122-126.
[9] Fisher, W.D. (1975) Heat induced sterility in Upland cotton. Proceedings of 27th Cotton Improvement Conference, 85.
[10] Zhao, Y.-Z. (1981) Climate in Liaoning and cotton production. Liaoning Agricultural Science, 5, 1-5.
[11] Reddy, K.R., Robana, R.R., Hodges, H.F., Liu, X.-J. and Mckinion, J.M. (1998) Interactions of CO2 enrichment and temperature on cotton growth and leaf characteristics. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 39, 117-129.
[12] Sawan, Z.M., Hanna, L.I. and McCuistions, W.L. (2006) Appropriate time scale for aggregating climatic data to predict flowering and boll setting behaviour of cotton in Egypt. Communication in Biometry and Crop Science, 1, 11-19.
[13] Sawan, Z.M., Hanna, L.I. and McCuistions, W.L. (2005) Response of flower and boll development to climatic factors before and after anthesis in Egyptian cotton. Climate Research, 29, 167-179.
[14] Sawan, Z.M., Hanna, L.I., McCuistions, W.L. and Foote, R.J. (2010) Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense) flower and boll production as affected by climatic factors and soil moisture status. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 99, 217-227.
[15] SAS Institute, Inc. (1985) SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. 5th Edition, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, 433-506.
[16] Cady, F.B. and Allen, D.M. (1972) Combining experiments to predict future yield data. Agronomy Journal, 64, 211-214.
[17] Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. (1966) Applied regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, 407 p.
[18] Kaur, R. and Singh, O.S. (1992) Response of growth stages of cotton varieties to moisture stress. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 35, 182-185.
[19] Hearn, A.B. and Constable, G.A. (1984) The physiology of tropical food crops. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, Chapter 14, 495-527.
[20] Bhatt, J.G. (1977) Growth and flowering of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by daylength and temperature. Journal of Agricultural Science, 89, 583-588.
[21] Meek, C.R., Oosterhuis, D.M. and Steger, A.T. (1999) Drought tolerance and foliar sprays of glycine betaine. Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Orlando, 3-7 January 1999, 559-561.
[22] Human, J.J., Du Toit, D., Bezuidenhout, H.D. and De Bruyn, L.P. (1990) The influence of plant water stress on net photosynthesis and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 164, 231-241.
[23] Miller, J.K., Krieg, D.R. and Paterson, R.E. (1996) Relationship between dryland cotton yields and weather parameters on the Southern Hig Plains. Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Nashville, 9-12 January 1996, 1165-1166.
[24] Holaday, A.S., Haigler, C.H., Srinivas, N.G., Martin, L.K. and Taylor, J.G. (1997) Alterations of leaf photosynthesis and fiber cellulose synthesis by cool night temperatures. Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, New Orleans, 6-10 January 1997, 1435-1436.
[25] Oosterhuis, D.M. (1997) Effect of temperature extremes on cotton yields in Arkansas. Proceedings of the Cotton Research Meeting, Monticello, 13 February 1997, 94-98.
[26] Mergeai, G. and Demol, J. (1991) Contribution to the study of the effect of various meteorological factors on production and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fibers. Bulletin des Recherches Agronomiqued de Gembloux, 26, 113-124.
[27] Ward, D.A. and Bunce, J.A. (1986) Responses of net photosynthesis and conductance to independent changes in the humidity environments of the upper and lower surfaces of leaves of sunflower and soybean. Journal of Experimental Botany, 37, 1842-1853.
[28] Gutiérrez Mas, J.C. and López, M. (2003) Heat, limitation of yields of cotton in Andalucia. Agricultura, Revista Agropecuaria, 72, 690-692.
[29] Wise, R.R., Olson, A.J., Schrader, S.M. and Sharkey, T.D. (2004) Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27, 717-724.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.