Using Capillary Pressure Derived Parameters for Improving Permeability Prediction

DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2013.49126   PDF   HTML     6,412 Downloads   9,161 Views   Citations


This paper presents the construction and verification of a new better semi-analytical, statistically derived universal model than that modified from Huet and Blasingame equation for estimating absolute permeability from mercury injection capillary pressure data. The foundation of my new model is the petrophysical relation between absolute permeability and capillary-pressure/wetting phase saturation properties. I also incorporate characteristics of capillary pressure behavior using the classic Brooks-Corey power-law model. The final form of my new proposed model allowed us to predict absolute permeability as a function of effective porosity, irreducible wetting phase saturation, displacement or threshold pressure corresponding pore throat radius, and basic pore size characteristics. I built my model using 189 sets of mercury—injection (Hg-air) capillary pressure data and measured permeability-including core samples from several reservoirs both carbonate and sandstone lithologies. I identified this correlation by quantifying its accuracy and precision based on regression analysis. I compared permeability estimates obtained from Huet and Blasingame mercury-injection capillary-pressure-based model and my new universal predicted permeability model to a set of laboratory measured permeability of my studied core sample and previously published data results respectively, where I quantified the methods accuracy and precision based on error analysis. The measured permeability samples range is from 0.003 mD to 5341 mD. I review current employed models that are classified as belonging to Poiseuille model.

Share and Cite:

A. Lala, "Using Capillary Pressure Derived Parameters for Improving Permeability Prediction," International Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 4 No. 9, 2013, pp. 1313-1320. doi: 10.4236/ijg.2013.49126.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] E. W. Washburn, “The Dynamic of Capillary Flow,” Physical Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1921, p. 273.
[2] P. H. Nelson, “Permeability-Porosity Relationships in Sedimentary Rock,” The Log Analyst, May-June 1994, pp. 38-62.
[3] C. C. Huet, J. A. Rushing, K. E. Newsham and T. A. Blasingame, “A Modified Purcell/Burdine Model for Estimating Absolute Permeability from Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure Data,” Paper IPTC 10994 Presented at the 2005 International Technology Conference, Doha, 21-23 November 2005, 12 p.
[4] W. R. Purcell, “Capillary Pressure—Their Measurement Using Mercury and the Calculation of Permeability There Form,” Transaction of AIME, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1949, pp. 39-48.
[5] N. T. Burdine, “Relative Permeability Calculations from Pore Size Distribution Data,” Transaction of AIME, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1953, pp. 71-78.
[6] R. H. Brooks and A. T. Corey, “Properties of Porous Media Affecting Fluid Flow,” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering (ASCE), Vol. 92, No. 2, 1966, pp. 61-88.
[7] K. Nakornthap and R. D. Evans, “Temperature Dependant Relative Permeability and Its Effect on Oil Displacement by Thermal Methods,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, Vol. 1, 1986, pp. 230-242.
[8] G. E. Archie, “Introduction to Petrophysics of Reservoir Rocks,” AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 34, No. 5, 1950, pp. 943-961.
[9] J. B. Jennings, “Capillary Pressure Techniques: Application to Exploration and Development Geology,” The American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin, Vol. 71, No. 10, 1987, pp. 1196-1209.
[10] J. H. M. Thomeer, “Introduction of a Pore Geometrical Factor Defined by a Capillary Pressure Curve,” Transaction of AIME, Vol. 219, No. 2057, 1960, pp. 354-358.
[11] J. H. M. Thomeer, “Air Permeability as a Function of Three Pore Network Parameters,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1983, pp. 809-814.
[12] M. C. Leverett, “Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids,” Transaction of AIME, Vol. 142, No. 1, 1941, pp. 341-358.
[13] L. J. Klinkenberg, “The Permeability of Porous Media to Liquids and Gases,” American Petroleum Institute, Drilling and Productions Practices, 1941, pp. 200-213.
[14] T. T. Schowalter, “Mechanics of Secondary Hydrocarbon Migration and Entrapment,” The American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin, Vol. 63, No. 5, 1979, pp. 723-760.
[15] A. J. Katz and A. H. Thompson, “Quantitative Prediction of Permeability in Porous Rock,” Physical Review B, Vol. 34, No. 11, 1986, pp. 8179-8181.
[16] A. J. Katz and A. H. Thompson, “Prediction of Rock Electrical Conductivity from Mercury Injection Measurements,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 92, No. B1, 1987, pp. 599-607.
[17] E. D. Pittman, “Relationship of Porosity and Permeability to Various Parameters Derived from Mercury Injection-Capillary Pressure Curve for Sandstone,” The American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin, Vol. 76, No. 2, 1992, pp. 191-198.
[18] A. H. Thompson, A. J. Katz and R. A. Raschke, “Estimation of Absolute Permeability from Capillary Pressure Measurements,” Paper SPE 16794 Presented at the 1987 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 27-30 September 1987, 7 p.
[19] T. Wu, “Permeability Predication and Capillary Pressure Simulation Sandstone Reservoir,” Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, 2004.
[20] J. S. Bradley, R. W. Duschatko and H. H. Hinch, “Pocket Permeameter: Hand-Held Device for Rapid Measurement of Permeability,” The American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin, Vol. 56, No. 3, 1972, pp. 568-571.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.