Evaluation of Conservative Treatment of Acute Fracture of the Odontoid Process of Axis with a Halo-Vest

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:416KB) PP. 296-299
DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2013.37054    2,723 Downloads   4,153 Views  

ABSTRACT

We fitted a halo-vest on patients with a fracture of the odontoid process of the axis and evaluated the effects of conservative treatment on cervical muscular atrophy and the number and type of patient complaints after bone union. Four patients had Anderson Type II fractures and 6 patients had Type III fractures. Bone union was observed in all patients within 3 months after injury. After halo-vest fitting, cervical muscular atrophy increased with time, however, it gradually improved after removal of the halo-vest. Patients fixed with a halo-vest for more than 10 weeks complained of cervical discomfort and limited range of motion. No patients with fixation for less than 10 weeks had problems in bone union or had cervical complaints. Thus, less than a 10-week fixation period was considered to be appropriate.

Cite this paper

Y. Yokoyama, H. Takahashi, Y. Iida, Y. Inoue, K. Hasegawa, D. Suzuki, S. Tsuge, W. Shishikura, K. Fukutake, R. Takamatsu, K. Nakamura and A. Wada, "Evaluation of Conservative Treatment of Acute Fracture of the Odontoid Process of Axis with a Halo-Vest," Open Journal of Orthopedics, Vol. 3 No. 7, 2013, pp. 296-299. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2013.37054.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] L. D. Anderson and R. T. D’Alonzo, “Fracture of the Odontoid Process of the Axis,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 56, No. 8, 1974, pp. 1663-1674.
[2] A. M. Levine and C. C. Edwards, “The Management of Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 67, No. 2, 1985, pp. 217-226.
[3] K. A. Greene, C. A. Dickman, F. F. Marciano, J. B. Drabier, M. N. Hadley and V. K. Sonntag, “Acute Axis Fractures. Analysis of Management and Outcome in 340 Consecutive Cases,” Spine, Vol. 22, 1997, pp. 1843-1852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199708150-00009
[4] M. N. Hadley, C. Browner and V. K. Sonntag, “Axis Fractures: A Comprehensive Review of Management and Treatment in 107 Cases,” Neurosurgery, Vol. 17, 1985, pp. 281-290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198508000-00006
[5] P. J. Lennarson, H. Mostafavi, V. C. Traynelis and B. C. Walters, “Management of type Ⅱ Dens Fractures: A Case-Control Study,” Spine, Vol. 25, No. 10, 2000, pp. 1234-1237.
[6] E. A. Seybold and J. C. Bayley, “Functional Outcome of Surgically and Conservatively Managed Dens Fractures,” Spine, Vol. 23, No. 17, 1998, pp. 1837-1846.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199809010-00006
[7] U. Vieweg and R. Schultheiss, “A Review of Halo Vest Treatment of Upper Cervical Spine Injuries,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 125, 2001, pp. 50-55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004020000182
[8] A. Ono, M. Amano, Y. Okamura, T. Numazawa, K. Ueyama, S. Nishizawa and S. Toh, “Muscle Atrophy after Treatment with Halovest,” Spine, Vol. 30, 2005, pp. E8-12.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.