Extracellular Fluid Accumulation Predicts Fluid Responsiveness after Hydroxyethyl Starch 70/0.5 Bolus Infusion during Major Abdominal Surgery

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that extracellular fluid accumulation predicts fluid responsiveness after hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solution bolus infusion during major abdominal surgery. Methods: Twenty patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy under general anesthesia were studied. Patients received 4 mL/kg boluses of Ringer’s acetate or 6% HES 70/0.5 solution over 15 min in random order when urine output decreased below 1.0 mL/kg/h. Stroke volume variation (SVV) and stroke volume index (SVI) were measured using the FloTracTM/VigileoTM system at pre-bolus, 15, 30, and 60 min after initiating bolus infusion. The percent change in pre-bolus extracellular fluid volume relative to that at the skin incision for arm (ΔVECF) was measured by bioelectrical impedance. Prediction of fluid responsiveness (an increase in SVI of ≥5%) by pre-bolus SVV or pre-bolus ΔVECF was tested by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Fluid bolus infusions in this study consisted of 61 Ringer’s acetate infusions and 62 HES infusions. The best AUCs for identifying fluid responsiveness were seen with pre-bolus ΔVECF for HES at 30 min and 60 min (AUC = 0.74, P = 0.022; AUC = 0.74, P = 0.0054, respectively). Optimal threshold values of pre-bolus ΔVECF for predicting fluid responsiveness were 6.5% for 30 min (sensitivity: 78%, specificity: 58%) and 7.7% for 60 min (sensitivity: 56%, specificity: 76%). Conclusion: Extracellular fluid volume predicts fluid responsiveness after HES solution bolus infusion during major abdominal surgery. Substantial fluid responsiveness is observed upon increased accumulation of extracellular fluids.

Share and Cite:

T. Ide, T. Tatara, T. Kaneko and S. Nishi, "Extracellular Fluid Accumulation Predicts Fluid Responsiveness after Hydroxyethyl Starch 70/0.5 Bolus Infusion during Major Abdominal Surgery," Open Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol. 3 No. 9, 2013, pp. 413-420. doi: 10.4236/ojanes.2013.39087.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] T. J. Gan, A. Soppitt, M. Maroof, et al., “Goal-Directed Intraoperative Fluid Administration Reduces Length of Hospital Stay after Major Surgery,” Anesthesiology, Vol. 97, No. 4, 2002, pp. 820-826.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200210000-00012
[2] A. Donati, S. Loggi, J.-C. Preiser, et al., “Goal-Directed Intraoperative Therapy Reduces Morbidity and Length of Hospital Stay in High-Risk Surgical Patients,” Chest, Vol. 132, No. 6, 2007, pp. 1817-1824.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-0621
[3] M. Bundgaard-Nielsen, K. Holte, N. H. Secher and H. Kehlet, “Monitoring of Peri-Operative Fluid Administration by Individualized Goal-Directed Therapy,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2007, pp. 331-340.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01221.x
[4] C. S. Hartog, M. Bauer and K. Reinhart, “The Efficacy and Safety of Colloid Resuscitation in the Critically Ill,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol. 112, No. 1, 2011, pp. 156-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eaff91
[5] C. S. Hartog, M. Kohl and K. Reinhart, “A Systematic Review of Third-Generation Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES130/ 0.4) in Resuscitation: Safety Not Adequately Addressed,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol. 112, No. 3, 2011, pp. 635-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820ad607
[6] D. Chappell, M. Jacob, K. Hofmann-Kiefer, et al., “A Rational Approach to Perioperative Fluid Management,” Anesthesiology, Vol. 109, No. 4, 2008, pp. 723-740.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181863117
[7] J.-L. Vincent, “Let’s Give Some Fluid and See What Happens” versus the “Mini-Fluid Challenge,” Anesthesiology, Vol. 115, No. 3, 2011, pp. 455-456.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318229a521
[8] M. Cannesson, “Non-Invasive Guidance of Fluid Therapy,” In: R. G. Hahn, Ed., Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, pp. 103-111.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733253
[9] T. Tatara, Y. Nagao and C. Tashiro, “Effect of Duration of Surgery on Fluid Balance during Abdominal Surgery: A Mathematical Model,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol. 109, No. 1, 2009, pp. 211-216.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a3d3dc
[10] K. Aukland and R. K. Reed, “Interstitial-Lymphatic Mechanisms in the Control of Extracellular Fluid Volume,” Physiological Reviews, Vol. 73, No. 1, 1993, pp. 1-78.
[11] T. Tatara and K. Tsuzaki, “Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Improves the Prediction for Extracellular Water Volume Changes during Abdominal Surgery,” Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1998, pp. 470-476.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199803000-00017
[12] D. Bracco, J.-P. Revelly, M. M. Berger and R. Chioléro, “Bedside Determination of Fluid Accumulation after Cardiac Surgery Using Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance,” Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 6, 1998, pp. 1065-1070.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199806000-00029
[13] D. Bracco, M. M. Berger, J.-P. Revelly, et al., “Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Assess Perioperative Fluid Changes,” Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 7, 2000, pp. 2390-2396.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200007000-00034
[14] A. De Lorenzo, A. Andreoli, J. Matthie and P. Withers, “Predicting Body Cell Mass with Bioimpedance by Using Theoretical Methods: A Technological Review,” Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 82, No. 5, 1997, pp. 1542-1558.
[15] V. Nisanevich, I. Felsenstein, G. Almogy, et al., “Effect of Intraoperative Fluid Management on Outcome after Intraabdominal Surgery,” Anesthesiology, Vol. 103, No. 1, 2005, pp. 25-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200507000-00008
[16] J. Renner, J. Scholz and B. Bein, “Monitoring Fluid Therapy,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2009, pp. 159-171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2008.12.001
[17] D. Lahner, B. Kabon, C. Marschalek, et al., “Evaluation of Stroke Volume Variation Obtained by Arterial Pulse Contour Analysis to Predict Fluid Responsiveness Intraoperatively,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 103, No. 3, 2009, pp. 346-351.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep200
[18] T. E. Miller and T. J. Gan, “Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy,” In: R. G. Hahn, Ed., Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, pp. 91-102.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733253.012
[19] J. Persson and P.-O. Grände, “Plasma Volume Expansion and Transcapillary Fluid Exchange in Skeletal Muscle of Albumin, Dextran, Gelatin, Hydroxyethyl Starch, and Saline after Trauma in the Cat,” Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 9, 2006, pp. 2456-2462.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000233876.87978.AB
[20] J. C. Fantone and P. A. Ward, “Inflammation,” In: E. Rubin and J. L. Farber, Eds., Pathology, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, 1999, pp. 37-75.
[21] B. T. Tedner, H. S. Jacobson, D. Linnarsson and L. E. Lins, “Impedance Fluid Volume Monitoring during Intravenous Infusion in Healthy Subjects,” Acute Care, Vol. 10, No. 3-4, 1983, pp. 200-206.
[22] C. G. Olthof, J. P. P. M. de Vries, P. M. J. M. de Vries, et al., “The Influence of Ringer’s Lactate and Gelatin Infusion on the Internal Fluid Balance of Healthy Volunteers Measured by a Non-Invasive Conductivity Technique,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1993, pp. 397-402.
[23] G. Biancofiore, L. A. H. Critchley, A. Lee, et al., “Evaluation of a New Software Version of the Flotrac/Vigileo (Version 3.02) and a Comparison with Previous Data in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Liver Transplant Surgery,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol. 113, No. 3, 2011, pp. 515-522.
[24] L. Meng, N. P. Tran, B. S. Alexander, et al., “The Impact of Phenylephrine, Ephedrine, and Increased Preload on Third-Generation Vigileo-FloTrac and Esophageal Doppler Cardiac Output Measurements,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol. 113, No. 4, 2011, pp. 751-757.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.