An Extension of Some Results Due to Cox and Leland

DOI: 10.4236/jmf.2013.34043   PDF   HTML   XML   3,240 Downloads   5,001 Views  


We investigate an optimal portfolio allocation problem between a risky and a risk-free asset, as in [1]. They obtained explicit conditions for path-independence and optimality of allocation strategies when the price of the risky asset follows a geometric Brownian motion with constant asset characteristics. This paper analyzes and extends their results for dynamic investment strategies by allowing for non-constant returns and volatility. We adopt a continuous-time approach and appeal to well established results in stochastic calculus for doing so.

Share and Cite:

A. Leung and W. Shi, "An Extension of Some Results Due to Cox and Leland," Journal of Mathematical Finance, Vol. 3 No. 4, 2013, pp. 416-425. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2013.34043.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] J. C. Cox and H. E. Leland, “On Dynamic Investment Strategies,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 24, No. 11-12, 2000, pp. 1859-1880.
[2] R. C. Merton, “Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuoustime Model,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1971, pp. 373-413.
[3] F. Black and M. Scholes, “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3, 1973, pp. 637-654.
[4] J. C. Cox and S. A. Ross, “The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1-2, 1976, pp. 145-166.
[5] P. Carr, H. Geman and D. Madan, “The Fine Structure of Asset Returns: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Business, Vol. 75, No. 2, 2002, pp. 305-332.
[6] S. Hodges and R. Clarkson, “Dynamic Asset Allocation: Insights from Theory,” Philosophical Transactions: Physical Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 347, No. 1684, 1994, pp. 587-598.
[7] R. C. Merton, “Lifetime Consumption under Uncertaintiy: The Continuous Time Case,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1969, pp. 247-257.
[8] S. A. Ross, “Mutual Fund Separation in Financial Theory—The Separating Distributions,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1978, pp. 254-286.
[9] G. S. Amin and H. M. Kat, “Hedge Fund Performance 1990-2000: Do the ‘Money Machines’ Really Add Value?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2003, pp. 251-274.
[10] S. Vanduffel, A. Chernih, M. Maj and W. Schoutens, “A Note on the Suboptimality of Path-Dependent Pay-Offs in Lévy Markets,” Applied Mathematical Finance, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2009, pp. 315-330.
[11] S. Kassberger and T. Liebmann, “When Are Path-Dependent Payoffs Suboptimal?” 2009.
[12] F. C. Klebaner, “Introduction to Stochastic Calculus with Applications,” Imperial College Press, London, 2005.
[13] O. C. Ibe, “Markov Processes for Stochastic Modeling,” Elsevier Academic Press, Waltham, 2009.
[14] M. J. Brennana, E. S. Schwartz and R. Lagnado, “Strategic Asset Allocation,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 21, No. 8-9, 1997, pp. 1377-1403.
[15] J. Cvitanic and V. Polimenis, “Optimal Portfolio Allocation with Higher Mo Moments,” Annals of Finance, 2008.
[16] S. P. Sethi, “A note on Mertons Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a continuous-Time Model,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 46, No. 2, 1988, pp. 395401.
[17] A. Meucci, “Review of Dynamic Allocation Strategies: Utility Maximization, Option Replication, Insurance, Drawdown Control, Convex-Concave Management,” 2010.
[18] K. Tanaka, “Dynamic Asset Allocation under Stochastic Interest Rate and Market Price of Risk,” 2009.
[19] C. Chiarella, C. Hsaio and W. Semmler, “Intertemporal Investment Strategies under Inflation Risk,” University of Technology, Sydney, 2007.
[20] S. E. Dreyfus, “Dynamic Programming and the Calculus of Variations,” Academic Press, Norwell, 1965.
[21] S. Janson and J. Tysk, “Feynman-Kac Formulas for BlackScholes Type Operators,” Bulletin London Mathematical Society, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 269-282.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.