Strong Laws of Large Numbers for Arrays of Rowwise Conditionally Negatively Dependent Random Variables

Abstract

Let {Xnk} be an array of rowwise conditionally negative dependent random variables. Complete convergence of to 0 is obtained by using various conditions on the moments and conditional means.

Share and Cite:

R. Patterson, T. Royal-Thomas and W. Patterson, "Strong Laws of Large Numbers for Arrays of Rowwise Conditionally Negatively Dependent Random Variables," Advances in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 3 No. 7, 2013, pp. 625-626. doi: 10.4236/apm.2013.37081.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

Concepts of negative dependence have been useful in developing laws of large numbers (cf: Taylor, Patterson and Bozorgnia [1]). Chung-type laws of large numbers for arrays of independent random variables were developed by Taylor, Patterson and Bozorgnia in [2].

Definition 1.1 Two random variables X and Y are pairwise negatively dependent (ND) if

(1)

for all.

Let (W, F, P) denote a probability space.

Definition 1.2. The sequence of random variables is said to be conditionally negatively dependent if there exists a sub s-field z of F such that for each positive integer m

(2)

where denotes the conditional probability of the random variable X being in the Boral set given the sub-s field z. Negatively dependent random variable are conditionally negatively dependent with respect to the trivial s-field.

Throughout this paper will denote rowwise conditionally independent random variables such that for all n and k. The major result of this paper shows that

. (3)

where complete convergence is defined (Hsu and Robbins [3]) by

. (4)

Here is a function on a separable Banach space toR. In the next section of this paper, strong laws of large numbers for arrays of rowwise conditionally negatively dependent random variables.

2. Strong Law for Random Variables

In this section, several lemmas are used in the proof of the major result. The first lemma will be presented without proof.

Lemma 2.1. Let X and Y be pairwise negatively dependent random variables. Then

Lemma 2.2. Let X and Y be pairwise negatively dependent random variables. Then

Proof: For X and Y negatively dependent, we have by Lemma 2.1

Theorem 2.1 Let be an array of rowwise conditionally negatively dependent random variables. If

a) (5)

and for all h > 0

b) (6)

where is the conditional expectation with respect to an appropriate s-field that gives conditional negative dependence. Then

.

Proof. Let h > 0 be given. By Markov’ inequality

(7)

By Lemma 2.2, the first term in Equation (7) is bounded by

.

The second term of Equation (7) is finite by Equation (6). Thus, the result follows.

3. Strong Law for Random Elements in Rm

Theorem 1.2 can be extended to Rm. The next definition is a crucial type p inequality used to define a form of negative dependence (cf. Patterson, Taylor, and Bozorgnia [4]).

Definition 3.1. Random elements, in a type p Banach space are said to be type p negatively dependent if and if there exist a finite positive constant C such that

(8)

for all n ≥ 1.

Coordinatewise (with respect to the standard basis) negative dependence in Rm can yield type 2 negative dependence. To see this for rowwise random elements, let be random elements in Rm such that for 1≤ i ≤ m, n, k ≥ 1. Then

(9)

Theorem 3.1 Let be an array of rowwise conditionally coordinatewise negatively random elements in Rm. If a)(10)

and for all h > 0 b)(11)

where is the conditional expectation with respect to an appropriate s-field that gives conditional negative dependence, then

Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] R. L. Taylor, R. Patterson and A. Bozorgnia, “A Strong Law of Large Numbers for Arrays of Rowwise Negatively Dependent Random Variables,” Stochastic Analysis and Applications, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2002, pp. 644-666.
[2] R. Patterson, R. L. Taylor and A. Bozorgnia, “Chung Type Stong Laws for Arrays of Random Elements and Bootstrapping,” Stochastic Analysis and Applications, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1997, pp. 651-669.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07362999708809501
[3] P. L. Hu and H. Robbins, “Complete Convergence and the Law of Large Numbers,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1947, pp. 25-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.33.2.25
[4] R. Patterson, R. L. Taylor and A. Bozorgnia, “Strong Laws of Large Numbers for Arrays of Rowwise Conditionally Independent Random Variables,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1993, pp. 1-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1048953393000012

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.