Using the Analytic Hierarchical Process to Define Choices for Re-Using Rural Buildings: Application to an Abandoned Village in Sicily

Patrizia Russo, Lara Riguccio, Laura Carullo, Giovanna Tomaselli

Department of Agri-Food and Environmental Systems Management, Catania University, Catania, Italia.

DOI: 10.4236/nr.2013.44039                

Abstract

It has been recognised for some time that traditional rural buildings are a cultural and/or practical “resource” of the countryside. Inappropriate re-conversions can result in the waste of valuable economic resources and the loss of local heritage. Thus, before reconstruction is started the possible types of re-use should be accurately evaluated. This work develops a method, based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, for identifying the best re-use of an abandoned village that was built in the first half of the last century. The method uses the guidelines of the countryside plan, and our work is a case study designed to verify whether or not it is suitable in this context. Five requisites for sustainable intervention were identified, as well as three alternative re-uses and five indicators. The hierarchical analysis was developed using two different approaches, one used three hierarchical levels, and the other used four. The results obtained for both approaches agree in suggesting the same model for re-use, but the four level approaches also supplied additional information which would be useful when planning projects with major social and cultural impact.

Keywords

Rural Resources; Architectural Resources; Cultural Resources

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	E. K. Zavadskas and J. Antucheviciene, “Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Rural Building’s Regeneration Alternatives,” Building and Environment, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2007, pp. 436-451. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.001
[2]	D. Zupancic, “Dispersed Vernacular Structures as Landscape Development Potential: The Case of the Alpine Region in Slovenia,” The Permanent European Conference for the Study of the Rural Landscape, 23rd Session —Landscapes, Identities and Development, Lisbon and óbidos, 1-5 September 2008, pp. 1-9.
[3]	A. Pennacchi, “Fascio e Martello,” Laterza, Bari, 2008.
[4]	P. Barbera, “Architettura in Sicilia tra le due Guerre,” Sellerio Editore, Palermo, 2002.
[5]	S. Di Fazio, “Libertinia: Un Borgo Rurale Fondato Negli Anni Venti in Sicilia,” Tecnica Agricola, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 65-105.
[6]	V. Sapienza, “La Colonizzazione del Latifondo Siciliano,” Edizioni Lussografia, Caltanissetta, 2010.
[7]	S. Di Fazio, “Il Problema Insediativo e la Pianificazione del Territorio Rurale in Sicilia Nella Prima Metà del XX Secolo,” Tecnica Agricola, Vol. 3-4, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1-26.
[8]	T. L. Saaty, “How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, 1990, pp. 9-26. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
[9]	T. L. Saaty and M. Sagir, “Global Awareness, Future City Design and Decision Making,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2012, pp. 337-355. doi:10.1007/s11518-012-5196-z
[10]	T. L. Saaty, “Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” International Journal of Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008, pp. 83-98. doi:10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
[11]	William Ho, “Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications—A Literature Review,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 186, No. 1, 2008, pp. 211-228. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
[12]	T. L. Saaty, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” RWS Publications, Pittsburg, 1996.
[13]	C. Y. Jim, “Old Stone Walls as an Ecological Habitat for Urban Trees in Hong Kong,” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1998, pp. 29-43. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00072-3
[14]	P. Russo, L. Carullo, L. Riguccio and G. Tomaselli, “Identification of Landscapes for Drafting Natura 2000 Network Management Plans: A Case Study in Sicily,” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 101, No. 3, 2011, pp. 228-243. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.028
[15]	Fegotto Virtual Museum, 2013. http://www.fegotto.it/
[16]	P. Tassinari, D. Torreggiani, S. Benni, E. Dall’Ara and G. Pollicino, “The FarmBuiLD Model (Farm Building Landscape Design): First Definition of Parametric Tools,” Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2011, pp. 485-493. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2011.05.001
[17]	D. Torreggiani, P. Tassinari, “Landscape Quality of Farm Buildings: The Evolution of the Design Approach in Italy,” Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2012, pp. 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2011.06.002
[18]	D. Torreggiani, E. Dall’Ara and P. Tassinari, “The Urban Nature of Agriculture: Bidirectional Trends between City and Countryside,” Cities, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2012, pp. 412-416. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2011.12.006
[19]	E. K. Zavadskas and J. Antucheviciene, “Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Rural Building’s Regeneration Alternatives,” Building and Environment, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2007, pp. 436-451. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.001
[20]	P. Dal Sasso, G. S. Mugnozza, R. V. Loisi and G. Marinelli, “Proposte dì Recupero Delle Borgate Rurali in Puglia,” Proceedings of the 9th National Conference AIIA, Thessaloniki, 12-16 September 2009, pp. 6-43.
[21]	P. Dal Sasso and L. P. Caliandro, “The Role of Historical Agro-Industrial Buildings in the Study of Rural Territory,” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 96, No. 3, 2010, pp. 146-162. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.003
[22]	Landscape Plan of Sicily, 20s13. http://bca.regione.sicilia.it/ptpr/main/index.htm
[23]	L. Jones-Walters, “Biodiversity in Multifunctional Landscapes,” Journal for Nature Conservation, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2008, pp. 117-119. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2008.03.001