Share This Article:

Leaf morphological variation among paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) genotypes across Canada

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:729KB) PP. 284-295
DOI: 10.4236/oje.2013.34033    3,491 Downloads   7,116 Views   Citations


Variations in leaf morphological characteristics have been extensively studied at both interand intraspecific levels although not explicitly on paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh). Paper birch populations might have considerable genotypic and leaf morphological variations that have allowed them to inhabit wide environmental gradients. In this study, we analyzed variations in leaf morphological characteristics in 23 paper birch populations collected across Canada and grown in a greenhouse. Furthermore, we examined whether the variations in leaf morphological characteristics observed were related to the climate of the population’s origin. We found significant genotypic differences in all leaf morphological characteristics (p < 0.05) measured among the birch populations. Thus, we expected that the morphological variations in birch might be related to natural diversity in birch populations due to environmental differences at habitat origin. Principal component analysis (PCA) reduced thirteen leaf morphological variables to five principal components (PC) explaining 84.74% of the total variance in the original data. PCs accumulated with specific leaf area, petiole and leaf width were positively related to latitudinal, longitudinal, and elevational gradients at the population’s origin. Unpredictably, these PCs were significantly negatively correlated to precipitation and aridity index at the origin. Thus, we analyzed if correlations within leaf morphological characteristics had supported the birch populations to acclimate and produce unpredictable relations with the environment of origin. Our results showed that the populations originated in limited precipitation (during growing season) had large leaf width and petiole size but low leaf hairs on adaxial surface. Thus, all these leaf morphological features provide a basis for the birch to reduce water loss from leaves and balance water use efficiency in reduced precipitation. Furthermore, the leaf characteristics measured may also include phenotypic plasticity of the birch as an acclimation to the environment as in the greenhouse.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Pyakurel, A. and Wang, J. (2013) Leaf morphological variation among paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) genotypes across Canada. Open Journal of Ecology, 3, 284-295. doi: 10.4236/oje.2013.34033.


[1] Via, S. and Lande, R. (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution, 39, 505-522. doi:10.2307/2408649
[2] Jonas, C.S. and Geber, M.A. (1999) Variation among populations of Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae) along altitudinal and latitudinal gradients. American Journal of Botany, 86, 333-343. doi:10.2307/2656755
[3] Bloom, A.J., Chapin, F.S. and Mooney, H.A. (1985) Resource limitation in plants—An economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 363-392. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.16.1.363
[4] McLellan, T. (2000) Geographic variation and plasticity of leaf shape and size in Begonia dregei and B. homonyma (Begoniaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 132, 79-95. doi:10.1006/bojl.1999.0292
[5] Ohsawa, T. and Ide, Y. (2008) Global patterns of genetic variation in plant species along vertical and horizontal gradients on mountains. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17, 152-163. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00357
[6] Uribe-Salas, D., Sáenz., R.C., González, R.A., Téllez, V.O. and Oyama, K. (2008) Foliar morphological variation in the white oak Quercus rugosa Née (Fagaceae) along a latitudinal gradient in Mexico: Potential implications for management and conservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 2121-2126. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.002
[7] Coleman, J.S., McConnaughay, K.D.M. and Ackerly, D.D. (1994) Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution (Personal Edition), 9, 187-191. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90087-6
[8] Kundu, S.K. and Tigerstedt, P.M.A. (1997) Geographical variation in seed and seedling traits of Neem (Azadirachta indica A. JUSS.) among ten populations studied in growth chamber. Silvae Genetica, 46, 2-3.
[9] Warren, C.R., Tausz, M. and Adams, M.A. (2005) Does rainfall explain variation in leaf morphology and physiology among populations of red ironbark (Eucalyptus sideroxylon subsp. tricarpa) grown in a common garden? Tree Physiology, 25, 1369-1378. doi:10.1093/treephys/25.11.1369
[10] Gates, D.M., Alderfer, R. and Taylor, E. (1968) Leaf temperatures of desert plants. Science, 159 994-995. doi:10.1126/science.159.3818.994
[11] Cordell, S., Goldstein, G., Mueller-Dombois, D., Webb, D. and Vitousek, P.M. (1998) Physiological and morphological variation in Metrosideros polymorpha, a dominant Hawaiian tree species, along an altitudinal gradient: The role of phenotypic plasticity. Oecologia, 113, 188-196. doi:10.1007/s004420050367
[12] McDonald, P.G., Fonseca, C.R., Overton, J.M. and Westoby, M. (2003) Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: Is the method of size reduction common among clades? Functional Ecology, 17, 50-57. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00698.x
[13] Roderick, M.L., Berry, S.L., and Noble, I.R. (2000) A framework for understanding the relationship between environment and vegetation based on the surface area to volume ratio of leaves. Functional Ecology, 14, 423-437. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00438.x
[14] Milla, R. and Reich, P.B. (2007) The scaling of leaf area and mass: The cost of light interception increases with leaf size. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2109-2115. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.2003
[15] Donselman, H.M. and Flint, H.L. (1982) Genecology of eastern redbud (Cercis canadensis). Ecology, 63, 962-971. doi:10.2307/1937236
[16] Hilaire, R.S. and Graves, W.R. (1999) Foliar traits of sugar maples and black maples near 43°N latitude in the eastern and central United States. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 124, 605-611.
[17] Ehleringer, J.R. and Mooney, H.A. (1978) Leaf hairs: Effects on physiological activity and adaptive value to a desert shrub. Oecologia, 37, 183-200. doi:10.1007/BF00344990
[18] Ehleringer, J., Mooney, H.A., Gulmon, S.L. and Rundel, P.W. (1981) Parallel evolution of leaf pubescence in encelia in coastal deserts of North and South America. Oecologia, 49, 38-41. doi:10.1007/BF00376895
[19] Ehleringer, J.R. and Bjorkman, O. (1978) Pubescence and leaf spectral characteristics in a desert shrub, Encelia farinosa. Oecologia, 36, 151-162. doi:10.1007/BF00349805
[20] Picotte, J.J., Rosenthal, D.M., Rhode, J.M. and Cruzan, M.B. (2007) Plastic responses to temporal variation in moisture availability: Consequences for water use efficiency and plant performance. Oecologia, 153, 821-832.
[21] Abrams, M.D. (1990) Adaptations and responses to drought in Quercus species of North America. Tree Physiology, 7, 227-238. doi:10.1093/treephys/7.1-2-3-4.227
[22] Abrams, M.D. (1994) Genotypic and phenotypic variation as stress adaptations in temperate tree species: A review of several case studies. Tree Physiology, 14, 833-842. doi:10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.833
[23] Werger, M.J.A. and Ellenbroek, G.A. (1978) Leaf size and leaf consistence of a riverine forest formation along a climatic gradient. Oecologia, 34, 297-308. doi:10.1007/BF00344908
[24] Niinemets, U., Afas, N.A., Cescatti, A., Pellis, A. and Ceulmans, R. (2004) Petiole length and biomass investment in support modify light interception efficiency in dense poplar plantations. Tree Physiology, 24, 141-154. doi:10.1093/treephys/24.2.141
[25] Niinemets, U., Portsmuth, A. and Tobias, M. (2006) Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid-ribs in temperate plants. New Phytologist, 171, 91-104.
[26] Poorter, L. and Rozendaal, D.M. (2008) Leaf size and leaf display of thirty-eight tropical tree species. Oecologia, 158, 35-46. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1131-x
[27] Meng, T.T., Ni, J. and Harrison, S.P. (2009) Plant morphometric traits and climate gradients in northern China: A meta-analysis using quadrat and flora data. Annals of Botany, 104, 1217-1229. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp230
[28] Bruschi, P., Grossoni, P. and Bussotti, F. (2003) Within- and among-tree variation in leaf morphology of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. natural populations. Trees, 17, 164-172.
[29] Calagari, M., Modirrahmati, A.R. and Asadi, F. (2006) Morphological variation in leaf traits of Populus euphratica Oliv. natural populations. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 8, 754-758.
[30] Joel, G., Aplet, G. and Vitousek, P.M. (1994) Leaf morphology along environmental gradients in Hawaiian Metrosideros polymorpha. Biotropica, 26, 17-22. doi:10.2307/2389106
[31] Aspelmeier, S. and Leuschner, C. (2006) Genotypic variation in drought response of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth): Leaf and root morphology and carbon partitioning. Trees, 20, 42-52. doi:10.1007/s00468-005-0011-9
[32] Dancik, B.P. and Barnes, B.V. (1974) Leaf diversity in yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis). Canadian Journal of Botany, 52, 2407-2414. doi:10.1139/b74-312
[33] Senn, J., Hanhimaki, S. and Haukioja, E. (1992) Among tree variation in leaf phenology and morphology and its correlation with insect performance in the mountain birch. Oikos, 63, 215-222. doi:10.2307/3545381
[34] Sharik, T.L. and Barnes, B.V. (1979) Natural variation in morphology among diverse populations of yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis) and sweet birch (B. lenta). Canadian Journal of Botany, 57, 1932-1939. doi:10.1139/b79-242
[35] Ashton, P.M.S., Plander, L.P., Berlyn, P., Thadani, R. and Cameron, I.R. (1998) Changes in leaf structure in relation to crown position and tree size of Betula papyrifera within fire-origin stands of interior cedar-hemlock. Canadian Journal of Botany, 76, 1180-1187. doi:10.1139/cjb-76-7-1180
[36] Farrar, J.L. (1995) Trees in Canada. Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Markham.
[37] Gurevitch, J. (1992) Sources of variation in leaf shape among two populations of Achillea lanulosa. Genetics, 130, 385-394.
[38] Aas, G. (1993) Taxonomical impact of morphological variation in Quercus robur and Q. petraea: A contribution to the hybrid controversy. Annals of Forest Sciences, 50, 107-113. doi:10.1051/forest:19930709
[39] Bruschi, P., Vendramin, G.G., Bussotti, F.A. and Grossoni, P. (2000) Morphological and molecular differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) liebl. and Quercus pubescens willd. (Fagaceae) in Northern and Central Italy. Annals of Botany, 85, 325-333. doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.1046
[40] Curtu, A.L., Gailing, O., Leinemann, L. and Finkeldey, R. (2007) Genetic variation and differentiation within a natural community of five oak species (Quercus spp.). Plant Biology, 9, 116-126. doi:10.1055/s-2006-924542
[41] Du, J.X., Wang, X.F. and Zhang, G.J. (2007) Leaf shape based plant species recognition. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 185, 883-893. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.072
[42] Kremer, A., Dupouey, J.L., Deans, J.D., Cottrell, J., Csaikl, U., Finkeldey, R., Espinel, S., Jensen, J., Kleinschmit, J., Dam, B.V., Ducousso, A., Forrest, I., Heredia, U.L.D., Lowe, A.J., Tutkova, M., Munro, R.C., Steinhoff, S. and Badeau, V. (2002) Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Annals of Forest Sciences, 59, 777-787. doi:10.1051/forest:2002065
[43] WinFolia (2007) Image analysis for plant science. Regent Instruments Inc., Nepean.
[44] Weather Environment Canada (2010)
[45] De Martonne, E. (1926) L’indice d’aridité, Bull, Ass. Geogr. France. In EURAC-Institute for applied remote sensing. (2011) Synthesis report-CLISP-Climate change adaptation by spatial planning in the alpine space.
[46] Migalina, S.V., Ivanova, L.A. and Makhnev, A.K. (2009) Size of the leaf as a marker of birch productivity at a distance from the climatic optimum. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 56, 858-862.
[47] Sjors, H. (1974) Ekologisk klimatlara. Vaxtbiologiska Institutionen Uppsala, Uppsala.
[48] Hovenden, M.J. and Schoor, J. (2004) Nature vs nurture in the leaf morphology of Southern beech, Nothofagus cunninghamii (Nothofagaceae). The New Phytologist, 161, 585-594. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00931.x
[49] Teklehaimanot, Z., Lanek, J. and Tomlinson, H.F. (1998) Provenance variation in morphology and leaflet anatomy of Parkia biglobosa and its relation to drought tolerance. Trees, 13, 96-102. doi:10.1007/PL00009742
[50] Hughes, A.R., Stachowicz, J.J. and Williams, S.L. (2009) Morphological and physiological variation among seagrass (Zostera marina) genotypes. Oecologia, 159, 725-733. doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1251-3
[51] Wilson, P.J., Thompson, K.E.N. and Hodgson, J.G. (1999) Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytologist, 143, 155-162. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00427.x
[52] Lovett, P.N. and Haq, N. (2000) Diversity of the sheanut tree (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.) in Ghana. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 47, 293-304. doi:10.1023/A:1008710331325
[53] Wright, I.J. and Westoby, M. (1999) Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species: Trait correlations across species, and trait shifts along nutrient compared to rainfall gradients. Journal of Ecology, 87, 85-97. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00330.x
[54] Yates, M.J., Anthony Verboom, G., Rebelo, A.G. and Cramer, M.D. (2010) Ecophysiological significance of leaf size variation in Proteaceae from the Cape Floristic Region. Functional Ecology, 24, 485-492. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01678.x
[55] Fonseca, C.R., Overton, J.M., Collins, B. and Westoby, M. (2000) Shifts in trait-combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gradients. Journal of Ecology, 88, 964-977. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00506.x
[56] Reich, P.B., Ellsworth, D.S. and Walters, M.B. (1998) Leaf structure (specific leaf area) modulates photosynthesis-nitrogen relations: Evidence from within and across species and functional groups. Functional Ecology, 12, 948-958. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00274.x
[57] Xu, Z.Z. and Zhou, G.S. (2006) Combined effects of water stress and high temperature on photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism and lipid peroxidation of a perennial grass Leymus chinensis. Planta, 224, 1080-1090. doi:10.1007/s00425-006-0281-5
[58] Tomlinson, K.W., Poorter, L., Sterck, F.J., Borghetti, F., Ward, D., de Bie, S. and van Langevelde, F. (2013) Leaf adaptations of evergreen and deciduous trees of semi-arid and humid savannas on three continents. Journal of Ecogy, 101, 430-440. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12056
[59] Farley, R.A. and McNeilly, T. (2000) Diversity and divergence in Cistus salvifolius (L.) populations from contrasting habitats. Hereditas, 132, 183-192.
[60] Johnson, H.B. (1975) Plant pubescence: An ecological perspective. Botanical Review, 41, 233-258. doi:10.1007/BF02860838
[61] Dudley, S.A. (1996) Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: A test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution, 50, 92-102. doi:10.2307/2410783
[62] Givnish, T.J. (1979) On the adaptive significance of leaf form. In: Solbrig, O.T., Jain, S., Johnson, G.B. and Raven, P.H., Eds., Topics in Plant Population Biology, Columbia University Press, New York, 375-407.
[63] Roy, B.A., Stanton, M.L. and Eppley, S.M. (1999) Effects of environmental stress on leaf hair density and consequences for selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 1089-1103.
[64] Ehleringer, J. (1982) The Influence of water stress and temperature on leaf pubescence development in Encelia farinosa. American Journal of Botany, 69, 670-675. doi:10.2307/2442956
[65] Schuepp, P.H. (1993) Tansley review No. 59. Leaf boundary layers. New Phytologist, 125, 477-507. doi:10.2307/2442956
[66] Pearce, D.W., Millard, S., Bray, D.F. and Rood, S.B. (2006) Stomatal characteristics of riparian poplar species in a semi-arid environment. Tree Physiology, 26, 211-218. doi:10.1093/treephys/26.2.211

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.