A Comparison Study of Cavitating Flow in a Ventricular Assist Device Using Laminar and Turbulent Model

DOI: 10.4236/jfcmv.2013.12006   PDF   HTML   XML   4,250 Downloads   8,618 Views   Citations


The two-dimensional cavitating flow phenomena due to the valve closure in a ventricular assist device were computationally studied. This is a simplification of three-dimensional viscous effects in a ventricular valve. Both laminar flow and turbulent flow were computed and compared with each other. For computations, a dynamic mesh strategy to cope with the movement of the valve was developed. The simulation of cavitation was conducted with a model which took considerations of the first-order effect of the formation and transport of vapor bubbles, the turbulent fluctuations of pressure and velocity, and the magnitude of non-condensable gases. The turbulent flow was computed by using thek-wmodel. The results show that the local turbulence is one of the vital effects on the development of the cavitating flow. The maximum velocity at the moments of valve closure was significantly reduced in the turbulent flow modeling. Turbulence also reduces the jet intensity at the valve closure and, hence, the cavitating region on the valve. Furthermore, the results show that the turbulent flow model has a better capability for prediction of cavitation duration.

Share and Cite:

C. Huang and J. Chen, "A Comparison Study of Cavitating Flow in a Ventricular Assist Device Using Laminar and Turbulent Model," Journal of Flow Control, Measurement & Visualization, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2013, pp. 33-48. doi: 10.4236/jfcmv.2013.12006.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] P. Johansen, “Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation,” Expert Review of Medical Devices, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2004, pp. 95-104. doi:10.1586/17434440.1.1.95
[2] C. M. Zapanta, D. R. Stein-bring, D. S. Sneckenberger, S. Deutsch, D. B. Geselowitz, J. M. Tarbell, A. J. Synder, G. Rosenberg, W. J. Weiss, W. E. Pai and W. S. Pierce, “In Vivo Observation of Cavitation on Prosthetic Heart Valves,” ASAIO Journal, Vol. 42, No. 5, 1992, pp. M550-M555. doi:10.1097/00002480-199609000-00047
[3] P. K. Paulsen, B. K. Jensen, J. M. Hasenkam and H. Nygaard, “High-Frequency Pressure Fluctuations Measured in Heart Valve Patients,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1999, pp. 482-487.
[4] T. S. Andersen, P. Johansen, P. K. Paulsen, H. Nygaard and J. M. Hasenkam, “Indication of Cavitation in Mechanical Heart Valve Patients,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2003, pp. 790-796.
[5] B. A. Herman, J. M. Porter and R. F. Carey, “Study of an Acoustic Technique to Detect Cavitation Produced by a Tilting Disc Valve,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1996, pp. 90-96.
[6] M. C. Shu, L. H. Leuer, T. L. Armitage, T. E. Schneider and D. R. Christiansen, “In Vitro Observations of Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 3, Suppl. 1, 1994, pp. S85-S93.
[7] Y. Nakayama and R. F. Boucher, “Introduction to Fluid Mechanics,” Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1999.
[8] Z. J. Wu, Y. Wang and N. H. Hwang, “Occluder Closing Behavior: A Key Factor in Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 3, Suppl. 1, 1994, pp. S25-S34.
[9] C. S. Lee, K. B. Chandran and L. D. Chen, “Cavitation Dynamics of Mechanical Heart Valve Prostheses,” Artificial Organs, Vol. 18, No. 10, 1994, pp. 758-767. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1594.1994.tb03315.x
[10] B. A. Biancucci, S. Deutsch, D. B. Geselowitz and J. M. Tarbell, “In Vitro Studies of Gas Bubble Formation by Mechanical Heart Valves,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1999, pp. 186-196.
[11] V. Kini, C. Bachmann, A. Fontaine, S. Deutsch and J. M. Tarbell, “Flow Visualization in Mechanical Heart Valves: Occluder Rebound and Cavitation Potential,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2000, pp. 431-441. doi:10.1114/1.281
[12] W. L. Lim, Y. T. Chew, H. T. Low and W. L. Foo, “Cavitation Phenomena in Mechanical Heart Valves: Role of Squeeze Flow Velocity and Contact Area on Cavitation Initiation between Two Impinging Rods,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 36, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1269-1280. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00161-1
[13] V. B. Makhihani, H. Q. Yang, A. K. Singhal and N. H. Hwang, “An Experimental-Computational Analysis of MHV Cavitation: Effects of Leaflet Squeezing and Rebound,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 3, Suppl. 1, 1994, S35-48.
[14] Y. G. Lai, K. B. Chandran and J. Lemmon, “A Numerical Simulation of Mechanical Heart Valve Closure Fluid Dynamics,” Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 35, No. 7, 2002, pp. 881-892. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00056-8
[15] R. Cheng, Y. G. Lai and K. B. Chandran, “Three-DimenSional Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve Flow Dynamics,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 11, 2004, pp. 1471- 1483. doi:10.1114/B:ABME.0000049032.51742.10
[16] C. K. Huang and J. H. Chen, “A Numerical Analysis of Cavitating Flow Due to a Closing Valve,” Journal of Taiwan Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2011, pp. 171-180.
[17] A. K. Singhal, M. M. Athavale, H. Li and Y. Jiang, “Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model,” Journal of Fluid Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 3, 2002, pp. 617-624. doi:10.1115/1.1486223
[18] D. C. Wilcox, “Turbulence Modeling for CFD,” DCW Industries, Inc., La Canada, 1994.
[19] J. Katz, “Cavitation Inception in Separated Flows,” Ph.D. Dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 1982.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.