Searching for the Lost Ostium: A Morphometric Analysis of the Ureteral Ostia Distribution in Normal and Thickened Bladders and Its Applications in Endourology

Mariana Greco, Paula Marsillac, Julia Vieira, Mario Brito, Andre Saud, Rafael Prinz, Joao Pereira-Correia

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Estácio de Sá University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

DOI: 10.4236/oju.2013.33028                

Abstract

Introduction: The ureteral ostia may not be easily identified in urological endoscopic procedures, leading to an incomplete diagnosis of urinary tract diseases or a predisposition to iatrogenic lesions. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the anatomical distribution of ureteralostia in normal bladders and those with thickened walls. Materials and Methods: We dissected 30 vesical-prostate blocks from human cadavers and identified the ostia of the bladder trigone. A computerized morphometric analysis was performed to measure the thickness of the detrusor muscle, the distances between the ureteral ostia themselves and the distances between each ureteral ostium (left—LUO and right—RUO) and the internal urethral ostium (IUO). The angle formed between the IUO and LUO/RUO was also recorded as well as the volume of the prostates. Results: Fifteen bladders with a non-thickened detrusor (<5 mm) as well as 15 bladders with muscular thickening (>6 mm) were identified. The average prostatic volume of the dissected blocks was 23.7 cm³. The distance between ureteral ostia, the distance from IUO to LUO, the distance from IUO to RUO and the angle formed between IUO and LUO/RUO in normal and thickened bladder were, respectively, 1.9 cm/2.2 cm (p = 0.09), 1.6 cm/1.6 cm (p = 0.82), 1.6 cm/1.7 cm (p = 0.79) and 77/91 (p = 0.17). Conclusions: Our study shows that there is no significant difference in the position of bladder ostia in healthy and thickened bladders. We believe that our findings may facilitate locating the ureteral orifices in situations where endoscopic identification is difficult.

Keywords

Ureteral Orifice; Cystoscopy; Bladder; Anatomy; Internal Urethral Orifice; Transurethral Resection of the Prostate; Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	V. O’Conor, “Bilateral Intramural Strictures of the Ureters after Transurethral Resection of the Prostate,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 145, No. 16, 1951, pp. 1249-1251. doi:10.1001/jama.1951.02920340027008
[2]	J. Davis, “Ureteral Injury by Transurethral Electroresection and Coagulation,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 68, No. 1, 1952, pp. 168-177.
[3]	R. Rees, “The Effect of Transurethral Resection of the Intravesical Ureter during the Removal of Bladder Tumours,” British Journal of Urology, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1969, pp. 2-5. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1969.tb09900.x
[4]	B. Posta, B. Streit and J. Schmauzer, “Transurethral Resection of the Carcinomatous Ureteral Orifice: Analysis of 27 Operations,” International Urology and Nephrology, Vol. 12, 1980, pp. 23-35. doi:10.1007/BF02085378
[5]	A. Gottfries, S. Nilsson, T. Sundin, et al, “Late Effects of Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumours at the Ureteric Orifice,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1975, pp. 32-35. doi:10.3109/00365597509139910
[6]	L. Kisbenedek, P. Szeldeli, G. Biró, et al., “Vesicoureteral Reflux Following Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumours at the Ureteral Orifice,” European Urology, Vol. 8, 1982, pp. 9-10.
[7]	A. Tubaro and C. Nunzio, “The Current Role of Open Surgery in BPH,” EAU-EBU Update Series, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2006, pp. 191-201. doi:10.1016/j.eeus.2006.07.002
[8]	J. Mandeville, E. Gnessin and J. Lingeman, “New Advances in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Laser Therapy,” Current Urology Reports, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2011, pp. 56-61. doi:10.1007/s11934-010-0153-1
[9]	K. McVary, C. Roehrborn, A. Avins, et al., “American Urological Association Guideline: Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH),” AUA Guidelines, 2010, pp. 1-27.
[10]	M. Oelke, A. Bachmann, A. Descazeaud, et al., “Guidelines on the Management of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), incl. Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO),” EAU Guidelines, 2012, pp. 1-74.
[11]	J. Dixon, C. Gilpin, S. Gilpin, et al., “Sequential Morphological Changes in the Pig Detrusor in Response to Chronic Partial Urethral Obstruction,” British Journal of Urology, Vol. 64, No. 4, 1989, pp. 385-390. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1989.tb06048.x
[12]	M. Oelke, K. Hofner, B. Wiese, et al., “Increase in Detrusor Wall Thickness Indicates Bladder Outlet Obstruction (BOO) in Men,” World Journal of Urolog, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2002, pp. 443-452.
[13]	F. Deture and R. Walker, “Measurement of the Distance from the Ureteral Orifice to the Bladder Neck: Additional Objective Data in the Cystoscopy of Patients with Reflux,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 112, 1974, pp. 326-328.
[14]	S. Yucel, M. Ucar, E. Guntekin, et al., “The Effect of Location of the Ureteric Orifice on the Efficacy of Endoscopic Injection to Correct Vesico-Ureteric Reflux,” BJU International, Vol. 95, No. 9, 2005, pp. 1314-1318. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05525.x
[15]	P. Schlegel and P. Walsh, “Neuroanatomical Approach to Radical Cystoprostatectomy with Preservation of Sexual Function,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 138, No. 6, 1987, pp. 1402-1406.
[16]	C. Manieri, S. Carter, G. Romano, et al., “The Diagnosis of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Men by Ultrasound Measurement of Bladder Wall Thickness,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 159, No. 3, 1998, pp. 761-765. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63723-6
[17]	M. Samplaski and J. Jones, “Two Centuries of Cystoscopy: The Development of Imaging, Instrumentation and Synergistic Technologies,” BJU International, Vol. 103, No. 2, 2009, pp. 154-158. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08244.x
[18]	T. Stedman, “Methods of Examining the Female Urinary Organs,” In: Twentieth Century Practice: An International Encyclopedia of Modern Medical Science by Leading Authorities of Europe and America, W. Wood and Company Inc., New York, 1895, pp. 235-237.
[19]	R. Lyon, S. Marshall and E. Tanagho, “The Ureteral Orifice: Its Configuration and Competency,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 102, No. 4, 1969, pp. 504-509.
[20]	R. Mano, O. Shoshany, J. Baniel, et al., “Resection of Ureteral Orifice during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: Functional and Oncologic Implications,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 188, No. 6, 2012, pp. 2129-2133. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.006
[21]	A. Bouchet and J. Cuilleret, “L’abdomen, la RégionrétroPéritonéale, le Petit Bassin, le Périnée,” In: Anatomietopographique: Descriptive Etfonctionnelle, Masson Inc., Paris, 1997, pp. 140-154.
[22]	L. Costacurta, “Aspectos da Anatomia Aplicada da Bexiga Urinária,” In: Anatomia Médico-Cirúrgica da Pelve Humana, Atheneu Inc., S?o Paulo, 1982, pp. 101-111.
[23]	P. Williams, R.Warwick, M. Dyson, et al., “A Bexiga Urinária,” In: Gray’s Anatomy, Guanabara Koogan Inc., Rio de Janeiro, 1989, pp. 1334-1337.
[24]	L. Cussen, “Normal Position of the Ureteral Orifice in Infancy and Childhood: A Quantitative Study,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 121, 1979, pp. 646-647.
[25]	Australian Bureau of Statistics, “The Average Australian —Mean Measured Height by Age and Sex, 1995 and 2007-08,” 2011. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4841.0Chapter22011
[26]	Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística—IBGE), “Dados Amostrais e Estimativas Populacionais das Medianas de Altura e Peso, por Situao do Domicílio e Sexo, Segundo a Idade e os Grupos de Idade Brasil—Período 2008-2009,” 2010. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/condicaodevida/pof/2008_2009_encaa/tabelas_ pdf/tab1_1.pdf
[27]	S. Jonmarker, A. Valdman, A. Lindberg, et al., “Tissue Shrinkage after Fixation with Formalin Injection of Prostatectomy Specimens,” Virchows Archiv, Vol. 449, No. 3, 2006, pp. 297-301. doi:10.1007/s00428-006-0259-5
[28]	A. Perks, T. Schuler, K. Pace, et al., “Prospective Determination of Ureteral Orifice Location: A Guide for Fluoroscopic Ureteral Stent Insertion,” Journal of Endourology, Vol. 22, 2008, pp. 1203-1207. doi:10.1089/end.2008.0048
[29]	T. Hatano, M. Hayakawa, Y. Koyama, et al., “New 3-Dimensional Mapping Device for Cystoscopy,” Journal of Urology, Vol. 158, No. 3, 1997, pp. 872-874. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64345-3
[30]	E. Bright, M. Oelke, M. Tubaro, et al., “Ultrasound Estimated Bladder Weight and Measurement of Bladder Wall Thickness—Useful Noninvasive Methods for Assessing the Lower Urinary Tract?” Journal of Urology, Vol. 184, No. 5, 2010, pp. 1847-1854. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.006
[31]	G. Franco, C. De Nunzio, C. Leonardo, et al., “Ultrasound Assessment of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion and Detrusor Wall Thickness—New Standards for Noninvasive Bladder Outlet Obstruction Diagnosis?” Journal of Urology, Vol. 183, No. 6, 2010, pp. 2270-2274. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.019
[32]	T. Huang, J. Qi, Y. Yu, et al., “Predictive Value of Resistive Index, Detrusor Wall Thickness and Ultrasound Estimated Bladder Weight Regarding the Outcome after Transurethral Prostatectomy for Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Obstruction,” International Journal of Urology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2012, pp. 343-350. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02942.x