Preferential Trade Agreements and the Law and Politics of GATT Article XXIV
Amin Alavi
DOI: 10.4236/blr.2010.11002   PDF    HTML     7,472 Downloads   14,024 Views   Citations


The tasks Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) perform are expressed in their scope and covered issues, thus in order to be WTO compatible these aspects of PTAs should comply with the relevant WTO rules. This paper examines which aspects of PTAs can violate these rules and therefore can be challenged before the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, who may initiate such cases and why there hasn´t been more cases dealing with this important issue.

Share and Cite:

A. Alavi, "Preferential Trade Agreements and the Law and Politics of GATT Article XXIV," Beijing Law Review, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2010, pp. 7-13. doi: 10.4236/blr.2010.11002.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bartels, L. (2009). Interim agreements under Article XXIV GATT. World Trade Review. 8(02). 339-350.
[2] Bartels, L. & Ortino F., Eds. (2006). Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. New York, Oxford University Press.
[3] Bhagwati, J. (2008). Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
[4] Cass, D. Z. (2005). The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization: Legitimacy, Democracy, and Community in the International Trading System. New York, Oxford University Press.
[5] Chase, K. (2006). “Multilateralism Compromised: The Mysterious Origins of GATT Article XXIV.” World Trade Review 5(01): 1-30.
[6] DG-Trade (2008). Interim Economic Partnership Agreements: Questions and Answers. Communique issued by European Commission, External Trade, 27.
[7] Gobbi, A. T. & Horlick, G. N. (2006). Mandatory Abolition of Anti-Dumping, Countervailing Duties and Safeguards in Customs Unions and Free Trade Areas Constituted between WTO Members: Revisiting a Long-standing Discussion in Light of the Appellate Body′s Turkey - Textiles Ruling. Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. L. Bartels and F. Ortino. New York, Oxford University Press: 109-148.
[8] Hoekman, B. M. & Kostecki, M. M. (1995). The Political Economy of the World Trading System: From GATT to WTO. Oxford; New York, Oxford University Press.
[9] Hoekman, B. M. & Mavroidis, P. C. (2009). Nothing dramatic (... regarding administration of customs laws). World Trade Review. 8 (Special Issue 01). 31-44.
[10] Islam, M. R. & Alam, S. (2009). Preferential trade agreements and the scope of GATT article XXIV, GATS article V and the enabling clause: An appraisal of GATT/WTO jurisprudence. Netherlands Inernational Law Review. 56(01). 1-34.
[11] Lockhart, N. J. S. & Mitchell, A. D. (2005). Regional Trade Agreements under GATT 1994: An Exception and Its Limits. Challenges and Prospects for the WTO. A. D. Mitchell. London, Cameron May.
[12] Pauwelyn, J. (2009). Nothing dramatic (... regarding administration of customs laws). World Trade Review 8(Special Issue 01). 45-48.
[13] Sinclair, I. M. (1973). The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Manchester, Manchester University Press.
[14] Whalley, J. (2008). Recent Regional Agreements: Why so many, why coming so fast, and where are they headed? The World Economy. 31(4). 517-532.
[15] WTO. (2006). Work of the Committee on Regional Trade Agreements (CRTA). Retrieved 15/4, 2008, from /tratop_e/region_e/regcom_e.htm.
[16] WTO (2007). Understanding the WTO. Geneva, World Trade Organization.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.