Mechanism of Discerning Similarities in Psychiatric Diagnoses

Abstract

Psychiatrists use similarities to make diagnoses in situations where rules are insufficient. The purpose of this study was to examine the criteria psychiatrists use to determine similarity between cases of personality disorder. Psychiatrists were provided with cases and were interviewed according to Kelly’s method. Cognitive science theories were used to explain the criteria identified. Results indicated that similarity decisions include idiosyncratic criteria. These results add to the current understanding of medical problem-solving processes and have implications for medical education.

Share and Cite:

Eshach, H. (2013). Mechanism of Discerning Similarities in Psychiatric Diagnoses. Creative Education, 4, 1-8. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.46A001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] American Psychiatric Association (APA) (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
[2] BarOn, E. (1993). Locally coherent views: Toward a unifying theory of mental capacity and local coherence. Unpublished manuscript.
[3] Barrows, H. S., & Feltovich, P. J. (1987). The clinical reasoning process. Medical Education, 21, 86-91. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00671.x
[4] Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1995). The development of clinical reasoning expertise. In J. Higgs, & M. Jones (Eds.), Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
[5] Butt, R., Raymond, D., & Yamaguishi, L. (1982). Autobiographic praxis: studying the formation of teachers’ knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 7, 87-164.
[6] Carroll, E. (1988). The role of tacit knowledge in problem solving in the clinical setting. Nurse Education Today, 8, 140-147. doi:10.1016/0260-6917(88)90031-7
[7] Cohen, G. (1996). Memory in the real world (2nd ed.). Hove: Psychology Press.
[8] Elstein, A. S. (1999) Heuristics and biases: Selected errors in clinical reasoning. Academic Medicine, 74, 791-794. doi:10.1097/00001888-199907000-00012
[9] Eshach, H., & Bitterman, H. (2002). From case-based reasoning to problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 78, 491-496. doi:10.1097/00001888-200305000-00011
[10] Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, T. M. (1995). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (3rd ed.). Hove: Psychology Press.
[11] Goldstone, R. L. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125-157. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90065-5
[12] Goodman, N. (1972). Problems and projects. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
[13] Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
[14] Higgs, J., & Jones, M. (1995). Clinical reasoning. In J. Higgs, & M. Jones (Eds.), Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann Ltd.
[15] Higgs, J., & Titchen, A. (1995). Propositional, professional and personal knowledge in clinical reasoning. In J. Higgs, & M. Jones (Eds.), Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann Ltd.
[16] Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809477
[17] Kaplan, H. I., & Sadock, B. J. (1996). Concise textbook of clinical psychiatry. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
[18] Kassirer, J. P., & Kopelman, R. I. (1991). Learning clinical reasoning. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
[19] Kelly, G. A. (1955a). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 1: A theory of personality). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
[20] Kelly, G. A. (1955b). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 2: Clinical diagnosis and psychotherapy). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
[21] Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
[22] Kolodny, J. A. (1994) Memory processes in classification learning: An investigation of amnesic performance in categorization of dot patterns and artistic styles. Psychological Science, 5, 164-169. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00654.x
[23] Leake, D. B. (1996). CBR in context: The present and future. In D. B. Leake (Ed.), Case-based reasoning: Experiences, lessons, & future directions. Menlo Park, CA/Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press.
[24] Morey, L.C. (1998). Personality diagnosis and personality disorders. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[25] Mostow, J. (1983). Machine transformation of advice into a heuristic search procedure. In R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, & T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach: Vol. 1. Los Altos, CA: Kaufmann.
[26] Norman, G. R., Coblentz, C. L., Brooks, L. R., & Babcock, C. J. (1992). Expertise in visual diagnosis: A review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 67, S78-S83.
[27] Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
[28] Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[29] Rissland, E. L., & Skalak, D. B. (1991). CABARET: Rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 839-887. doi:10.1016/0020-7373(91)90013-W
[30] Rumelhart, D. E. (1989). Toward a microstructural account of human reasoning. In S. Vosniadou, & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511529863.014
[31] Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[32] Sloman, S. A., & Rips, J. L. (1998) Similarity as an explanatory construct. In A. S. Sloman, & L. J. Rips (Eds.), Similarities and symbols in human thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[33] Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557842
[34] Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511529863
[35] Voss, J. F., & Post T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[36] Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367-427. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0204_2
[37] Zohar, A., & Peled, B. (2008). The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low and high-achieving students. Learning and Instruction, 18, 337-353. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.07.
001
[38] Zohar, A., & Ben David, A. (2008). Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognitive Learning, 4, 59-82. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9019-4

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.