Thermal Comfort Zone for Thai People

DOI: 10.4236/eng.2013.55062   PDF   HTML     3,573 Downloads   5,492 Views   Citations


Radiant cooling system for thermal comfort of Thai people was developed. Questionnaires for subjective experiments were examined for development of radiant cooling system for thermal comfort. Thermal sensation, humid sensation and air movement sensation were used for thermal comfort assessment. The Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) value was used for thermal comfort evaluation and it was observed that the PMV values are in the comfortable ranges during 18:00 to 10:00 for air velocity 0.2 m/s and 0.4 m/s. Comfortable periods are extended for higher air velocity. Neutral temperatures are in the ranges of 26.44℃-33.60. The percentage number of dissatisfied (PPD) value for each air velocity was also investigate and the value of PPD is five for zero value of PMV. Simulation and experimental results were evaluated by using three indicators, namely, the coefficient of variation (CV), the mean bias error (MBE) and Chi-Square (x2). The values of CV, MBE and (x2) for mean radiant temperature are 14.52%, 1.54% and 3.95, respectively. Zones of acceptable thermal environment were developed for Thai People. Results revealed that the comfortable zones of Thai people are in the ranges of relative humidity 50% 70% and effective temperatures (ET) 24 27℃.

Share and Cite:

J. Taweekun and A. Tantiwichien, "Thermal Comfort Zone for Thai People," Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 5, 2013, pp. 525-529. doi: 10.4236/eng.2013.55062.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[2] C. G. Webb, “On Some Observation of Indoor Climate in Malaya,” Journal of the Institution of Heating and Ventilating Engineers, Vol. 20, No. 204, 1959, pp. 189-195.
[3] J. F. Busch, “Thermal Responses to the Thai Office Environment,” ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 96, No. 1, 1990, pp. 859-872.
[4] T. H. Karyono, “Higher PMV Causes Higher Energy Consumption in Air-Conditioned Buildings: A Case Study in Jakarta, Indonesia,” In: Standards for Thermal Comfort: Indoor Air Temperature Standards for the 21st Century, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1995, pp. 219-226.
[5] T. Imarori, T. Omori and K. Bogaki, “Thermal Comfort and Energy Consumption of the Radiant Ceiling Panel System: Comparison with All-Air System,” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1999, pp. 167-175. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00084-X
[6] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), “Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy,” ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-1992, ASHRAE, Atlanta, 1992.
[7] P. O. Fanger, “Thermal Comfort Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering,” Mcgraw-Hill, New York, 1970.
[8] W. J. Stevenson, “Using Artificial Neural Nets to Predict Building Energy Parameters,” ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 100, No. 2, 1994, pp. 1081-1087.
[9] J. F. Kreider, D. Claridge, P. S. Curtiss, R. Dodier, J. Haberl and M. Krarti, “Recurrent Neural Networks for Building Energy Use Prediction and System Identification: A Progress Report,” ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 3, 1995, pp. 161-166. doi:10.1115/1.2847757
[10] A. Dhar, T. A. Reddy and D. E. Claridge, “Modeling Hourly Energy Use in Commercial Buildings with Fourier Series Functional Forms,” ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 3, 1998, pp. 217-223. doi:10.1115/1.2888072

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.