Modification of soil properties by Prosopis L. in the Kalahari Desert, South-Western Botswana

Samuel Mosweu, Christopher Munyati, Tibangayuka Kabanda

Department of Environmental Science, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Department of Geography and Environmental Science, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, Mafikeng, South Africa.

DOI: 10.4236/oje.2013.32017                

Abstract

The aim of this research was to investigate the interactions between Prosopis plants and soils in the Kalahari area, south west of Botswana. The underlying assumptions of the research were that Prosopis plants significantly enhanced the nutrient content and improved the condition of soils in the study area, and that the height and canopy size of Prosopis plants affected the interactions between Prosopis plants and the soils. Firstly, soil samples were collected under 42 randomly selected Prosopis plant canopies and in the spaces between Prosopis plant canopies at the depth of 0 -20 cmand 60 –80 cm. Secondly, soil samples were collected under 45 randomly selected Prosopis plant canopies of three different categories of height and canopy size at the depth of 0 -10 cm. The soil samples were analysed for soil organic carbon, pH, total nitrogen (N), electrical conductivity (EC), calcium (Ca), sodium (Na), potassium (K), and magnesium (Mg). Soil collected under Prosopis plant canopies and in the spaces between Prosopis plant canopies showed statistically significant difference in the soil organic carbon content (F = 2.68, P = 0.05, α = 0.05), pH (F = 44.81, P < 0.001; α = 0.05) and electrical conductivity (EC) (F = 3.75, P = 0.01, α = 0.05). Statistically significant difference was also observed in the comparison of soils existing under Classes 1, 2 and 3 Prosopis plant canopies in relation to pH and EC (F = 6.56, P = 0.01 and F = 4.77, P = 0.01 respectively at α = 0.05). Therefore, it was concluded that the fundamental assumptions of the study were valid.

Keywords

Prosopis Species; Soil Properties; Kalahari Desert; Botswana

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Pasiecznik, N.M. (2001) The Prosopis juliflora-Prosopis pallid complex: A momograph. HDRA, Coventry.
[2]	Burkart, A. (1976) A monograph of the genus Prosopis (Leguminosae sub-fam. Mimosoideae): Part 1. and Part 2. Catalogue of the recognized species of Prosopis. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 57, 219-249.
[3]	Felker, P. and Clark, P.R. (1981) Rooting of mesquite (Prosopis) cuttings. Journal of Range Management, 34, 466-468. doi:10.2307/3898099
[4]	Schlesinger, W.H., Raikes, J.A., Hartley, A.E. and Cross, A.F. (1996) On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystem. Ecology, 77, 364-374. doi:10.2307/2265615
[5]	Geesing, D., Felker, P. and Bingham, R.L. (2000) Influence of mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) on soil nitrogen and carbon development: Implications for global carbon sequestration. Journal of Arid Environments, 46, 157-180. doi:10.1006/jare.2000.0661
[6]	Robinson, D. (1994) The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytologist, 127, 635-674. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb02969.x
[7]	Maestre, F.T. and Reynolds, J.F. (2006) Small-scale spatial heterogeneity in the vertical distribution of soil nutrients has limited effects on the growth and development of Prosopis glandulosa seedlings. Plant Ecology, 183, 65-75. doi:10.1007/s11258-005-9007-1
[8]	Ludwig, J.A., Reynolds, J.F. and Whitson, P.D. (1975) Size-biomass relations of several Chihuahuan Desert shrubs. American Midland Naturalist, 94, 451-461. doi:10.2307/2424437
[9]	Reynolds, J.F., Virgia, R.A., Kemp, P.R., De Soyza, A.G. and Tremmel, D.C. (1999) Impact of drought on desert shrubs: Effects of seasonality and degree of resource island development. Ecological Monographs, 69, 69-106. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0069:IODODS]2.0.CO;2
[10]	Timberlake, J. (1980) Handbook of Botswana Acacias. Ministry of Agriculture, Gaborone.
[11]	Lancaster, I.N. (1978) The pans of Southern Kalahari, Botswana. Geographical Journal, 144, 81-98. doi:10.2307/634651
[12]	Shaw, P.A. and Thomas, S.G. (1997) Pans, playas and salt lakes. In: Thomas, D.S.G., Ed., Arid Zone Geomorphology; Process, Form and Change in Drylands. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 293-312.
[13]	Muzila, M., Setshogo, M.P., Moseki, B. and Morapedi, R. (2011) An assessment of Prosopis L. in the Bokspits area, south-western Botswana, based on morphology. The African Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 5, 75-80.
[14]	Bhalotra, Y.P.R. (1985) Rainfall maps of Botswana. Department of Meteorological Services, Gaborone.
[15]	Sonnevelt, C. and vandenEnde, J. (1971) Soil analysis by means of a 1:2 volume extract. Plant Soil, 35, 505-506. doi:10.1007/BF01372683
[16]	Chhabra, R., Pleysier, J. and Cremers, A. (1975) The measurement of the cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations in soils: A new method. Proceedings of International Clay Conference, Mexico City, 439-449.
[17]	Garg, V.K. (1998) Interaction of tree crops with a sodic soil environment: Potential for rehabilitation of degraded environments. Land Degradation a Development, 9, 81-93. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199801/02)9:1<81::AID-LDR267>3.0.CO;2-R
[18]	Skarpe, C. (1986) Plant community structure in relation to grazing and environmental changes along a North South transect in Western Kalahari. Vegetatio, 68, 3-18.
[19]	Vanderpost, C., Ringrose, S., Matheson, W. and Arntzen, J. (2011) Satellite based long-term assessment of rangeland condition in semi-arid areas: An example from Botswana. Journal of Arid Environments, 75, 383-389. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.11.002
[20]	Bhojvaid, P.P., Timmer, V.R. and Singh, G. (1996) Reclaiming sodic soils for wheat production by Prosopi juli-flora (Swartz) DC afforestation in India. Agroforestry Systems, 34, 139-150. doi:10.1007/BF00148158
[21]	Singh. G. (1996) The role of Prosopis in reclaiming high-pH soils and in meeting firewood and forage needs of small farmers. In: Felker, P. and Moss, J., Eds., Prosopis: Semiarid Fuelwood and Forage Tree; Building Consensus for the Disenfranchised, Center for Semi-Arid Forest Resources, Kingsville, 4.21-4.34.