CAS-Complications Rate and Relation to Risk Factors

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk factors for CAS with cerebral protection and the incidence of complication in patients with severe carotid stenosis. Materials and Methods: Overall, 95 consecutive patients with an average age of 64.67 years (28 - 83) (16 women (17%) and 79 men (83%)) were enrolled in the prospective monocentric study. Indication for CAS was symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥70% (n = 60 (63.16%)) or asymptomatic stenosis ≥80% (n = 35 (36.84%)) according to the NASCET criteria on DSA, which were not suitable for surgery. Results: From the selected risk factors, the most frequently found were arterial hypertension in 87 patients (91.6%), ischemic heart disease in 70 (73.7%), hyperlipidemia in 61 (64.2%), history of stroke in 43 (45.3%), diabetes mellitus in 35 (36.8%), smoking in 13 (13.7%), and age more than 75 years in 9 (9.5%). Significantly more frequent complications in elderly patients (more than the age of 75 years) were experienced: TIA (p = 0.049), early death (p = 0.049), restenosis (p = 0.04), and overall mortality (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Among the studied risk factors, only patients more than the age of 75 years were affected by the incidence of serious complications.

Share and Cite:

K. Zeleňák, V. Nosáľ, J. Zeleňáková, E. Kurča, I. Šinák, Š. Sivák and H. Poláček, "CAS-Complications Rate and Relation to Risk Factors," Open Journal of Radiology, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2013, pp. 26-32. doi: 10.4236/ojrad.2013.31004.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] 1999 World Health Organisation, “International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee,” Journal of Hypertension, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1999, pp. 151-183.
[2] A. Arboix, V. Cendrós, M. Besa, L. García-Eroles, M. Oliveres, C. Targa, M. Balcells, E. Comes and J. Massons, “Trends in Risk Factors, and Outcome Stroke Subtypes,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2008, pp. 509-516.
[3] R. L. Sacco, R. Adams, G. Albers, M. J. Alberts, O. Benavente, K. Furie, L. B. Goldstein, P. Gorelick, J. Hal perin, R. Harbaugh, S. C. Johnston, I. Katzan, M. Kelly Hayes, E. J. Kenton, M. Marks, L. H. Schwamm, T. Tomsick, American Heart Association; American Stroke Association Council on Stroke, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention and American Academy of Neurology, “Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke,” Stroke, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2006, pp. 577-617.
[4] R. L. Sacco, “Newer Risk Factors for Stroke,” Neurology, Vol. 57, No. 5 Suppl 2, 2001, pp. 31-34.
[5] R. Gupta, M. Horowitz and T. G. Jovin, “Hemodynamic Instability after Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stent Place ment: A Review of the Literature,” Neurosurgical Focus, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2005, p. e6. doi:10.3171/foc.2005.18.1.7
[6] G. Pappadà, E. Beghi, R. Marina, E. Agostoni, C. Cesana, F. Legnani, M. Parolin, D. Petri and E. P. Sganzerla, “He modynamic Instability after Extracranial Carotid Stenting,” Acta Neurochirurgica, Vol. 148, No. 6, 2006, pp. 639-645.
[7] E. Touzé, D. Calveta, G. Chatellierb and J. L. Mas, “Carotid Stenting,” Current Opinion in Neurology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2008, pp. 56-63. doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e3282f313d2
[8] European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group, “Randomized Trial of Endarterectomy for Recently Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Final Results of the MRC Euro pean Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST),” Lancet, Vol. 351, No. 9113, 1998, pp. 1379-1387.
[9] A. Halliday, A. Mansfield, J. Marro, C. Peto, R. Peto, J. Potter, D. Thomas and MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group, “Prevention of Disabling and Fatal Strokes by Successful Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients without Recent Neurological Symptoms: Randomised Controlled Trial,” Lancet, Vol. 363, No. 9420, 2004, pp. 1491-1502.
[10] American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Society of Interventional & Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, So ciety of Interventional Radiology, E. R. Bates, J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey Jr., C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, W. A. Gray, K. Ouriel, E. D. Peterson, K. Rosenfield, J. H. Rundback, R. D. Safian, M. A. Sloan and C. J. White, “ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Committee Carotid Stenting,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2007, pp. 126-170.
[11] SPACE Collaborative Group, P. A. Ringleb, J. Allenberg, H. Brückmann, H. H. Eckstein, G. Fraedrich, M. Hartmann, M. Hennerici, O. Jansen, G. Klein, A. Kunze, P. Marx, K. Niederkorn, W. Schmiedt, L. Solymosi, R. Stingele, H. Zeumer and W. Hacke, “30 Day Results from the SPACE Trial of Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients: A Ran domized Noninferiority Trial,” Lancet, Vol. 368, No. 9543, 2006, pp. 1239-1247.
[12] M. Bosiers, P. Peeters, K. Deloose, J. Verbist, H. Sievert, J. Sugita, F. Castriota and A. Cremonesi, “Does Carotid Artery Stenting Work on the Long Run: 5-Year Results in High-Volume Centers (Eloc Registry),” The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 46, No. 3, 2005, pp. 241-247.
[13] R. Stingele and P. A. Ringleb, “To Stent or Not to Stent: Stent-Protected Percutaneous Angioplasty versus Endar terectomy Post Hoc Analyzes,” Current Opinion in Neurology, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2009, pp. 75-79.
[14] SPACE Collaborative Group, “30 Day Results from the SPACE Trial of Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients: A Randomised Non-Inferiority Trial,” Lancet, Vol. 368, No. 9543, 2006, pp. 1239-1247.
[15] R. Topakian, M. Sonnberger, K. Nussbaumer, H. P. Haring, J. Trenkler and F. T. Aichner, “Posprocedural High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Predicts Carotid Stent Patency at 1 Year,” European Journal of Neurology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2008, pp. 179-184.
[16] A. Mathur, G. S. Roubini, S. S. Iyer, C. Piamsonboon, M. W. Liu, C. R. Gomez, J. S. Yadav, H. D. Chastain, L. M. Fox, L. S. Dean and J. J. Vitek, “Predictors of Stroke Complicating Carotid Artery Stenting,” Circulation, Vol. 97, No. 13, 1998, pp. 1239-1245.
[17] L. H. Bonati, G. Fraedrich and Carotid Stenting Trialists’ Collaboration, “Age Modifies the Relative Risk of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotidstenosis—A Pooled Analysis of EVA-3S, SPACE and ICSS,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2011, pp. 153-158.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.