Differences in arsenic, molybdenum, barium, and other physicochemical relationships in groundwater between sites with and without mining activities

Lia Méndez-Rodríguez, Tania Zenteno-Savín, Baudilio Acosta-Vargas, Jobst Wurl, Miguel Imaz-Lamadrid

Department of Marine Geology, Autonomous University of Baja California Sur, La Paz, México.
Environmental Planning and Conservation, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C., La Paz, México;.

DOI: 10.4236/ns.2013.52A035                

Abstract

The characteristic relationships of trace metals and other water quality parameters in a specific region can be affected by anthropogenic activeties. Since the mid-18th century in the southwestern part of the Baja California Peninsula, intermittent gold mining activities have been developed. We analyzed 36 water quality parameters in accordance with the procedures suggested by international agencies to evaluate the impact of this activity and the time of year on the mobilization of trace element levels and their relationships in groundwater. Quantifiable levels of molybdenum help to establish the area influenced by ore deposits because it is one of the three elements in the paragenesis associated to gold. Arsenic in sites closer to ore burning areas was associated with cobalt, indicating the potential presence of a by-product generated from arsenolite; whereas in the non-mineralized area, it was associated with barium, forming a compound that tends to precipitate, thereby maintaining a natural geochemical control in this region. From the sites sampled, 45% exceeded the limit for arsenic (10 μg/l) established by international agencies. During area monitoring with annual precipitation of 207 mm, only seven of 36 parameters analyzed showed significant differences in relation to time of year.

Keywords

Arsenic; Barium; Molybdenum; Water Quality; Ore Deposits

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Kloprogge, T., Loc, V.D., Matt, W. and Wayde, N.M. (2006) Nondestructive identification of arsenic and cobalt minerals from Cobalt City, Ontario, Canada: Arsenolite, erythrite and spherocobaltite on pararammelsbergite. Applied Spectroscopy, 60, 1293-1296. doi:10.1366/000370206778999148
[2]	Carrillo, A. and Drever, J. (1998) Environmental assessment of the potential for arsenic leaching into groundwater from mine wastes in Baja California Sur, México. Geofísica Internacional, 37, 35-39.
[3]	Schoof, R. (2003) Guide for Incorporating bioavailability adjustments into human health and ecological risk assessments at U. S. department of defense facilities part 1: Overview of metals bioavailability. Battelle, Columbus.
[4]	Mineral Resources Council (1999) Geological-Mining Monograph of the State of Baja California Sur. Secretary of Commerce and Industrial Development. General Coordinator of Mining, Pachuca.
[5]	Carrillo-Chávez, A., Drever, J.I. and Martínez, M. (2000) Arsenic content and groundwater geochemistry of the San Antonio-El Triunfo, Carrizal and Los Planes aquifers in Southernmost Baja California, Mexico. Environmental Geology. 39, 1295-1303. doi:10.1007/s002540000153
[6]	World Health Organization (WHO) (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Health criteria and other supporting information, Geneva.
[7]	American Public Health Association (APHA) (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington.
[8]	Lobato, L.M., Dos Reis Vieira, F.W., Rebeiro-Rodrigues, L.C., Motta Pereira, L.M., De Menezes, M.G., Alves Junqueira, P. and Martins Pereira S. (1998) Styles of hydrothermal alteration and gold mineralizations associated with the nova lima group of the quadrilátero ferrífero: Part I, description of selected gold deposits. Revista Brasileira de Geociências, 8, 339-354.
[9]	Erba, E. (2004) Calcareous nannofossils and Mesozoic oceanic anoxic events. Marine Micropaleontology, 52, 85-106. doi:10.1016/j.marmicro.2004.04.007
[10]	Corbella, M., Ayora, C. and Cardellach, E. (2004) Hydrothermal mixing, carbonate dissolution and sulfide precipitation in Mississippi Valley-type deposits. Mineralium Deposita, 39, 344-357. doi:10.1007/s00126-004-0412-5
[11]	Zachariá?, J., Pertold, Z., Pudilová, M., ?ák, K., Pertoldová, J., Stein, H. and Markey, R. (2001) Geology and genesis of Variscan porphyry-style gold mineralization, Petrá?kova hora deposit, Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic. Mineralim Deposita, 36, 517-541. doi:10.1007/s001260100187
[12]	Cortecci, G., Boschetti, T., Mussi, M., Herrera Lameli, C., Mucchino, C. and Barbieri, M. (2005) New chemical and original isotopic data on waters from El Tatio geothermal field, northern Chile. Geochemical Journal, 39, 547-571. doi:10.2343/geochemj.39.547
[13]	Nordstrom, D.K. (2000) Advances in the hydrogeochemistry and microbiology of acid mine drainage. International Geology Review, 42, 499-515. doi:10.1080/00206810009465095
[14]	Shinkai, Y., Truc, D.V., Sumi, D., Canh, D. and Kumagai, Y. (2007) Arsenic and other metal contamination of groundwater in the Mekong River Delta, Vietnam. Journal of Health Science, 53, 344-346. doi:10.1248/jhs.53.344c
[15]	Kontak, D., Kyser, K., Gize, A. and Marshall, D. (2006) Structurally controlled vein barite mineralization in the Maritimes basin of Eastern Canada: Geologic setting, stable isotopes, and fluid inclusions. Economic Geology, 101, 407-430. doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.101.2.407
[16]	Zhu, Y., Zhang, X., Xie, Q., Chen, Y., Wang, D., Liang, Y. and Lu, J. (2005) Solubility and stability of barium arsenate and barium hydrogen arsenate at 25 degrees C. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 120, 37-44. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.12.025
[17]	Robin, R. (1985) The solubility of barium arsenates: Sherritt’s barium arsenate process. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 16, 404-406.
[18]	Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2009) National primary and secondary drinking water regulations. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 816-F09-004, Washington.
[19]	Vengosh, A., Heumann, K.G., Juraske, S. and Kasher, R. (1994) Boron isotope application for tracing sources of contamination in groundwater. Environmental Science and Technology, 28, 1968-1974. doi:10.1021/es00060a030