Dukor’s African Unfreedom and Moral Responsibility


It is axiomatic for most African scholars that the colonizers are responsible for the present problems facing the African continent. This is given much credence by Maduabuchi Dukor citing a barrage of issues which in summary pointed to the fact that the legacy of the colonizers to the African continent was ill willed to create chaos and therefore to make the African perpetually dependent on the colonizers. This paper accepts this fact but insists that the African as a human being with free will and responsibility cannot continue to blame the colonizers when he has choice either to reject the colonial predetermined events or to accept them taking responsibility for his actions.

Share and Cite:

Ezenwankwor, J. (2013). Dukor’s African Unfreedom and Moral Responsibility. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 213-217. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.31A035.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Ayittey, G. (1998). Obstacles to African development. In G. A. Agbango (Ed.), Issues and trends in contemporary African politics: Suitability, development, and democratization (pp. 321-336). New York: Peter Lang.
[2] Bernstein, M. (2006). Can we ever be really, truly, ultimately, free? In P. French, H. Wettstein, & J. M. Fischer (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy volume xxix free will and moral responsibility (pp. 1-13). Boston: Wiley.
[3] Chihuri, S. (2012). The problem with Africa. URL (last checked 9 September 2012). http://www.newzimbabwe.com/pages/opinion94.13175.html
[4] Dukor, M. (2012). The African freedom, the freedom of philosophy. Sarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
[5] Fischer, M. J. (2001). A new compatibilism. In W. L. Ekstrom (Ed.), Agency and responsibility: Essays on the metaphysics of freedom (pp. 38-53). Boulder: Westview Press.
[6] Folasade-Koyi, A. (2012). Same sex marriage ban irrevocable—Mark. URL (last checked 14 January 2012). http://www.sunnewsonline.com/webpages/news/national/2011/dec/02/national-02-12-2011-010html.
[7] Hunt, D. (2006). Moral responsibility and buffered alternatives. In P. French, H. Wettstein, & J. M. Fischer (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy volume XXIX free will and moral responsibility (pp. 126-145). Boston: Wiley.
[8] Lehmann, C. (2012). Neo-colonialism, subversion in Africa and global conflict. URL (last checked 8 September 2012). http://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/neo-colonialism-subversion-in-africa-and-global-conflict/.
[9] Mazrui, A. A. (1998). Neo-dependency and Africa’s fragmentation. In P. H. Coetzee, & A. P. J. Roux (Eds.), The African philosophy reader (pp. 528-546). London: Routledge.
[10] Nkrumah, K. (1964). Consciencism philosophy and ideology for de-colonization. New York: Monthly Review Press.
[11] Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. London: Routledge.
[12] Roshwald, M. (2000). Liberty, its meaning and scope. Westport: Green- wood Press.
[13] Thierstein, J., & Kalipour, Y. (2000). Religion, law and freedom: A global perspective. Westport: Praeger.
[14] Wesseling, H. L. (1996). Divide and rule, the partition of Africa, 1880-1914. Westport: Praeger.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.