Negotiated Complexity: Framing Multi-Criteria Decision Support in Environmental Health Practice

DOI: 10.4236/ajor.2013.31A015   PDF   HTML   XML   4,014 Downloads   6,431 Views   Citations


The complexity we take into account when dealing with complex issues and the way we deal with that complexity is not given or self-evident, it is framed and negotiated. Based on two environmental health decision support case studies we address a set of key methodological choices, crucial in shaping the multi-criteria decision support and illuminate how they followed from transdisciplinary collaboration and negotiation: diversity tolerance, dealing with uncertainty and difference of opinion, weight of information and the epistemological divide between traditional closed and alternative open paradigms. The case studies exemplify the growing conviction amongst methodologists that, especially regarding complex issues, best methods do not exist as such: methods are chosen and tailored in practice and the quality to a large extent is dependent on the process in which methodological development is embedded. We hope to contribute to making explicit the importance of methodological decision making regarding environmental health complexity.

Share and Cite:

H. Keune, J. Springael and W. Keyser, "Negotiated Complexity: Framing Multi-Criteria Decision Support in Environmental Health Practice," American Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 3 No. 1A, 2013, pp. 153-166. doi: 10.4236/ajor.2013.31A015.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] C. E. Lindblom and D. K. Cohen, “Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving,” Yale University Press, New Haven, 1979.
[2] J. Rosenhead, “Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict,” John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1989.
[3] C. H. Weiss, “Policy Research: Data, Ideas, or Arguments?” In: P. Wagner, C. H. Weiss, B. Wittrock and H. Wollmann, Eds., Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiments and Theoretical Crossroads, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991, pp. 307-332.
[4] G. M. Marakas, “Decision Support Systems in the 21st Century,” Prentice Hall Pearson Education, New Jersey, 1999.
[5] V. Belton and T. Stewart, “Muliple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach,” Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2002. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
[6] G. A. Mendoza and H. Martins “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Natural Resource Management: A Critical Review of Methods and New Modelling Paradigms,” Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 230, No. 1-3, 2006, pp. 1-22. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023
[7] W. Wittmer, F. Rauschmayer, B. Klauer, “How to Select Instruments for the Resolution of Environmental Conflicts?” Land Use Policy, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.003
[8] G. Munda, “Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73703-2
[9] J. Wang, Y. Jing, C. Zhang and J. Zhao, “Review on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Aid in Sustainable Energy Decision-Making,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, No. 9, 2009, pp. 2263-2278. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
[10] P. Cilliers, “Complexity, Deconstruction and Relativism,” Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 22, No. 5, 2005, pp. 255-267. doi:10.1177/0263276405058052
[11] S. D. Pohekar and M. Ramachandran, “Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Sustainable Energy Planning—A Review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2004, pp. 365-381. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
[12] J. Kangas and A. Kangas, “Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Forest Management—The Approach, Methods Applied, and Experiences Gained,” Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 207, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 133-143. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.023
[13] S. R. J. Sheppard and M. Meitner, “Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and Visualisation for Sustainable Forest Management Planning with Stakeholder Groups,” Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 207, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 171-187. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.032
[14] J. Ananda and G. Herath, “A Critical Review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods with Special Reference to Forest Management and Planning,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, No. 10, 2009, pp. 2535-2548. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010
[15] S. Hajkowicz and K. Collins, “A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management,” Water Resources Management, Vol. 21, No. 9, 2007, pp. 1553-1566. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9112-5
[16] B. A. Bryan and J. M. Kandulu, “Designing a Policy Mix and Sequence for Mitigating Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in a Water Supply Catchment,” Water Resources Management, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2011, pp. 875-892. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9731-8
[17] G. E. Kersten, “e-Democracy and Participatory Decision Processes: Lessons from e-Negotiation Experiments,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 12, No. 2-3, 2004, pp. 127-143. doi:10.1002/mcda.352
[18] K. Hayashi, “Multicriteria Analysis for Agricultural Resource Management: A Critical Survey and Future Perspectives,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 122, No. 2, 2000, pp. 486-500. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00249-0
[19] C. P. López, J. C. J. Groot, C. Carmona-Torres and W. A. H. Rossing, “An Integrated Approach for Ex-Ante Evaluation of Public Policies for Sustainable Agriculture at Landscape Level,” Land Use Policy, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1020-1030. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.006
[20] W. Proctor and M. Drechsler, “Deliberative Multicriteria Evaluation,” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2006, pp. 169-190. doi:10.1068/c22s
[21] V. Oikonomou, P. G. Dimitrakopoulos and A. Y. Troumbis, “Incorporating Ecosystem Function Concept in Environmental Planning and Decision Making by Means of Multi-Criteria Evaluation: The Case-Study of Kalloni, Lesbos, Greece,” Environmental Management, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2011, pp. 77-92. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9575-2
[22] G. A. Kiker, T. S. Bridges, A. Varghese, T. P. Seager and I. Linkov, “Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making,” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2005, pp. 95-108. doi:10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1
[23] K. Steele, Y. Carmel, J. Cross and C. Wilcox, “Uses and Misuses of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in Environmental Decision Making,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2009, pp. 26-33. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01130.x
[24] I. B. Huang, J. Keisler and I. Linkov, “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Sciences: Ten Years of Applications and Trends,” Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 409, No. 19, 2011, pp. 3578-3594. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022
[25] I. Linkov, F. K. Satterstrom, G. Kiker, C. Batchelor, T. Bridges and E. Ferguson, “From Comparative Risk Assessment to Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Adaptive Management: Recent Developments and Applications,” Environment International, Vol. 32, No. 8, 2006, pp. 1072-1093. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.013
[26] I. Linkov, P. Welle, D. Loney, A. Tkachuk, L. Canis, J. B. Kim and T. Bridges, “Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Weight of Evidence Evaluation,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 31, No. 8, 2011, pp. 1211-1225. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01585.x
[27] N. Chang, S. Ning and J. Chen, “Multicriteria Relocation Analysis of an Off-Site Radioactive Monitoring Network for a Nuclear Power Plant,” Environmental Management, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2006, pp. 197-217. doi:10.1007/s00267-005-0007-7
[28] A. Critto, S. Torresan, E. Semenzin, S. Giove, M. Mesman, A. J. Schouten, M. Rutgers and A. Marcomini, “Development of a Site-Specific Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites: Part I. A Multi-Criteria Based System for the Selection of Ecotoxicological Tests and Ecological Observations,” Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 379, No. 1, 2007, pp. 16-33. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.02.035
[29] E. Semenzin, A. Critto, C. Carlon, M. Rutgers, and A. Marcomini, “Development of a Site-Specific Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites: Part II. A Multi-Criteria Based System for the Selection of Bioavailability Assessment Tools,” Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 379, No. 1, 2007, pp. 34-45. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.02.034
[30] D. Hidalgo, R. Irusta, L. Martinez, D. Fatta and A. Papadopoulos, “Development of a Multi-Function Software Decision Support Tool for the Promotion of the Safe Reuse of Treated Urban Wastewater,” Desalination, Vol. 215, No. 1-3, 2007, pp. 90-103. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2006.09.028
[31] L. Carlsen, “Hierarchical Partial Order Ranking,” Environmental Pollution, Vol. 155, No. 2, 2008, pp. 247-253. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.023
[32] M. Alvarez-Guerra, L. Canis, N. Voulvoulis, J. R. Viguri and I. Linkov, “Prioritization of Sediment Management Alternatives Using Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis,” Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 408, No. 20, 2010, pp. 4354-4367. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.016
[33] J. Pan, C. J. Oates, C. Ihlenfeld, J. A. Plant, and N. Voulvoulis, “Screening and Prioritisation of Chemical Risks from Metal Mining Operations, Identifying Exposure Media of Concern,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 163, No. 1-4, 2010, pp. 555-571. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-0858-0
[34] M. Dursun, E. Karsak and M. Karadayi, “A Fuzzy MultiCriteria Group Decision Making Framework for Evaluating Health-Care Waste Disposal Alternatives,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2011, pp. 1145311462. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.019
[35] R. Baltussen and L. Niessen, “Priority Setting of Health Interventions: The Need for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,” Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, Vol. 4, No. 14, 2006. doi:10.1186/1478-7547-4-14
[36] M. Holdsworth, Y. Kameli and F. Delpeuch, “Stake-holder Views on Policy Options for Responding to the Growing Challenge from Obesity in France: Findings from the PorGrow Project,” Obesity Reviews, Vol. 8, Supplement 2, 2007, pp. 53-61. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00359.x
[37] S. Peacock, C. Mitton, A. Bate, B. McCoy and C. Donaldson, “Overcoming Barriers to Priority Setting Using Interdisciplinary Methods,” Health Policy, Vol. 92, No. 2, 2009, pp. 124-132. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.02.006
[38] M. Goetghebeur, M. Wagner, H. Khoury, D. Rindress, J. Grégoire and C. Deal, “Combining Multicriteria Decision Analysis, Ethics and Health Technology Assessment: Applying the EVIDEM Decisionmaking Framework to Growth Hormone for Turner Syndrome Patients,” Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2010. doi:10.1186/1478-7547-8-4
[39] H. Keune, B. Morrens, J. Springael, G. Koppen, A. Colles, I. Loots, K. Van Campenhout, H. Chovanova, M. Bilau, L. Bruckers, V. Nelen, W. Baeyens and N. Van Larebeke, “Policy Interpretation of Human Biomonitoring Research Results in Belgium; Priorities and Complexity, Politics and Science,” Environmental Policy and Governance, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2009, pp. 115-129. doi:10.1002/eet.500
[40] H. Keune, B. Morrens, K. Croes, A. Colles, G. Koppen, J. Springael, I. Loots, K. Van Campenhout, H. Chovanova, G. Schoeters, V. Nelen, W. Baeyens and N. Van Larebeke, “Open the Research Agenda: Participatory Selection of Hot Spots for Human Biomonitoring Research in Belgium,” Environmental Health, Vol. 9, No. 33, 2010. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-9-33
[41] M. Bilau, C. Matthys, W. Baeyens, L. Bruckers, G. de Backer, E. den Hond, H. Keune, G. Koppen, V. Nelen, G. Schoeters, N. van Larebeke, J. Willems and S. de Henauw, “Dietary Exposure to Dioxin-Like Compounds in Three Age Groups. Results from the Flemish Environment and Health Study,” Chemosphere, Vol. 70, No. 4, 2009, pp. 584-592. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.008
[42] C. Schroijen, W. Baeyens, G. Schoeters, E. Den Hond, G. Koppen, L. Bruckers, V. Nelen, E. Van De Mieroop, M. Bilau, A. Covaci, H. Keune, I. Loots, J. Kleinjans, W. Dhooge and N. Van Larebeke, “Internal Exposure to Pollutants Measured in Blood and Urine of Flemish Adolescents in Function of Area of Residence,” Chemosphere, Vol. 71, No. 7, 2008, pp. 1317-1325. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.053
[43] H. Keune, I. Loots, L. Bruckers, M. Bilau, G. Koppen, N. Van Larebeke, G. Schoeters, V. Nelen and W. Baeyens, “Monitoring Environment, Health and Perception: An Experimental Survey on Health and Environment in Flanders, Belgium,” International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Vol. 8, No. 1-2, 2008, pp. 90-111. doi:10.1504/IJGENVI.2008.017262
[44] S. O. Funtowicz and J. R. Ravetz, “Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy,” Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0621-1
[45] S. O. Funtowicz and J. R. Ravetz, “A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues,” In: R. Costanza, Ed, Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, Columbia University Press, New York, 1991, pp. 137-152.
[46] S. O. Funtowicz and J. R. Ravetz, “Science for the Post-Normal Age,” Futures, Vol. 25, No. 7, 1993, pp. 739-755. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
[47] S. O. Funtowicz and J. R. Ravetz, “The Worth of a Songbird: Ecological Economics as a Post-Normal Science,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1994, pp. 197-207. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(94)90108-2
[48] T. Kuhn, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962.
[49] A. Vatn, “An Institutional Analysis of Methods for Environmental Appraisal,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, No. 8-9, 2009, pp. 2207-2215, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.005
[50] D. Arnott and G. Pervan, “Eight Key Issues for the Decision Support Systems Discipline,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2008, pp. 657-672. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2007.09.003
[51] C. D. Gamper and C. Turcanu, “On the Governmental Use of Multi-Criteria Analysis,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2007, pp. 298-307. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.010
[52] A. Stirling, “Analysis, Participation and Power: Justification and Closure in Participatory Multi-Criteria Analysis,” Land Use Policy, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2006, pp. 95-107. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010
[53] A. Stirling, “Opening Up and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology,” Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2008, pp. 262-294. doi:10.1177/0162243907311265
[54] S. Maasen and O. Lieven, “Transdisciplinarity: A New Mode of Governing Science?” Science and Public Policy, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2006, pp. 399-410. doi:10.3152/147154306781778803
[55] P. Stern and H. Fineberg, “Understanding Risk: Information Decisions in a Democratic Society,” National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, 1996.
[56] J. Chilvers, “Deliberating Competence Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice,” Science, Technology, & Human Values Vol. 33 No. 2, 2008, pp. 155-185. doi:10.1177/0162243907307594
[57] C. Banville, M. Landry, J. Martel and C. Boulaire, “A Stakeholder Approach to MCDA,” Systems Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1998, pp. 15-32.
[58] W. de Keyser and J. Springael, “Why Don’t We Kiss!?: A Contribution to Close the Gap between Real-World Decision Makers and Theoretical Decision-Model Builders,” University Press, Antwerp, 2009.
[59] M. G. Kendall, “Rank Correlation Methods,” Griffin, London, 1948.
[60] P. Grandjean, “Non-Precautionary Aspects of Toxicology,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Vol. 207, Supplement 2, 2005, pp. 652-657. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2004.11.029
[61] M. McCally, “Life Support, the Environment and Human Health,” The MIT Press, Cambridge, London, 2002.
[62] P. Harremoes, D. Gee, M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, J. Keys, B. Wynne and S. Guedes Vaz, “The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century, Late Lessons from Early Warnings,” Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, 2002.
[63] V. Covello, “Risk Comparisons and Risk Communication: Issues and Problems in Communicating Health and Environmental Risks,” In: R. E. Kasperson and P. J. M. Stallen, Eds., Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991, pp. 79-124. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_6
[64] P. Slovic, “Perceived Risk, Trust and Democracy,” In: R. Lofstedt and L. Frewer, Eds., Risk and Modern Society, The Earthscan Reader: Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, 1998, pp. 181-192.
[65] O. Renn and B. Rohrmann, “Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies,” Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2000.
[66] R. K. Leik, “A Measure of Ordinal Consensus,” The Pacific Sociological Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1996, pp. 85-90. doi:10.2307/1388242
[67] M. Albert, S. Laberge, B. D. Hodges, G. Regehr and L. Lingard, “Biomedical Scientists Perception of the Social Sciences in Health Research,” Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 66, No. 12, 2008, pp. 2520-2531. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.052

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.