Polluting Productions and Sustainable Economic Growth: A Local Stability Analysis

Giovanni Bella

University of Cagliari, Italy.

DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2009.21007                

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the link between natural capital and economic growth, in a Romer-type economy characterized by dirty emissions in the production process, and to examine the conditions under which a sustainable growth, which implies a decreasing level of dirty emissions, might be both feasible and optimal. This work is close to Aghion-Howitt (1998) with some more general specifications, in particular regarding the structure of preferences and the technological sector. We also deeply study the transitional dynamics of this economy towards the steady state, and conclude that a determinate saddle path sustainable equilibrium can be reached even in presence of a long run positive level of polluting emissions, thanks to a growing level of new home-made inventories, without whom some indetermi-nacy problems are likely to emerge.

Keywords

local stability, sustainable growth, aghion-howitt model

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	D. I. Stern, “The rise and fall of the environmental kuznets curve,” World Development 32, pp. 1419-1439, 2004.
[2]	S. Smulders, “Environmental policy and sustainable eco-nomic growth: An endogenous growth perspective,” De Economist 143, pp. 163-195, 1995.
[3]	A. L. Bovenberg and S. Smulders, “Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model,” Journal of Public Economics 57, pp. 369-391, 1995.
[4]	A. L. Bovenberg and S. Smulders, “Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endogenous growth model,” International Economic Review 37, pp. 861-893, 1996.
[5]	K. Pittel, “Sustainability and endogenous growth,” Ed-ward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2003.
[6]	P. Aghion and P. Howitt, “Endogenous growth theory (2nd edition),” MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998.
[7]	A. Grimaud and F. Ricci, “The growth-environment trade-off: horizontal vs vertical innovations,” Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei Working Paper n, pp. 34-99, 1999.
[8]	P. Schou, “Polluting non renewable resources and growth,” Environmental and Resource Economics 16 (2), pp. 211-227, 2000.
[9]	S. Slobodyan, “Indeterminacy and stability in a modified Romer model,” Journal of Macroeconomics 29, pp. 169-177, 2007.
[10]	A. Grimaud, “Pollution permits and sustainable growth in a schumpeterian model,” Journal of Environmental Eco-nomics and Management 38, pp. 249-266, 1999.
[11]	S. I. Restrepo-Ochoa and J. Vazquez, “Cyclical features of the Uzawa--Lucas endogenous growth model,” Eco-nomic Modelling 21, pp. 285-322, 2004.
[12]	M. A. Gomez, “Transitional dynamics in an endogenous growth model with physical capital,” Human Capital and R&D. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 9 (1), article 5, 2005.
[13]	S. Smulders, “Economic growth and environmental qual-ity,” In: Folmer, H., Gabel, L. (Eds), Principles of Envi-ronmental and Resource Economics, Edward Elgar, Chapter 20, pp. 602-664, 2000.
[14]	S. Smulders, “Entropy, environment, and endogenous economic growth,” International Tax and Public Finance 2, pp. 319-340, 1995.
[15]	I. Musu, “Transitional dynamics to optimal sustainable growth,” Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei Working Paper n. 50.95, 1995.
[16]	R. J. Barro and X. Salai-Martin, “Economic growth,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995.
[17]	T. Asada, W. Semmler, and A. J. Novak, “Endogenous growth and the balanced growth equilibrium,” Research in Economics 52, pp. 189-212, 1998.
[18]	J. Benhabib, R. Perli, and D. Xie, Monopolistic competi-tion, indeterminacy and growth. Ricerche Economiche 48, pp. 279-298, 1994.
[19]	L. G. Arnold, “Endogenous technological change: A note on stability,” Economic Theory 16, pp. 219-226, 2000.
[20]	L. G. Arnold, “Stability of the market equilibrium in Ro-mer's model of endogenous technological change: A com-plete characterization,” Journal of Macroeconomics 22, pp. 69-84, 2000.