Surgical Outcome Following Hip Fracture in Patients > 100 Years Old: Will They Ever Walk Again?

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in medicine have led to a growth in the centenarian population (>100 years old). Centenarians are a largely unstudied population but as longevity increases, so will the cost of providing care for this group. Methods: One hundred and ten patients were admitted to SBMC 195 times between 2000 and 2009. Thirteen patients were treated for hip fracture. Data abstracted from the charts of these patients including age, gender, ethnicity, co-morbidities, advance directives (ADRs), functional status, length of stay (LOS), pre-operative and post-operative residential status and ambulatory status, ASA grade, type of anesthesia, duration of surgery and for complications of surgery or anesthesia. Results: The mean age was 101.2 years (100 to 104 years) with an M:F ratio of 2:11. The most common co-morbidities were hypertension, anemia, congestive heart failure (CHF) and coronary artery disease. Among the 13 patients with hip fractures, 12 had operative intervention while one was treated conservatively. The mean ASA grade was 2.75 (1 - 4). Five patients had surgery under general anesthesia and seven received spinal anesthesia. Five patients received a bi-polar hip replacement and seven patients underwent internal fixation. The mean operative time was 47.6 min (27 - 90 min). Five (41.7%) patients required a peri-operative blood transfusion. The mean post-anesthesia recovery score was 9.42 (9 - 10). All patients, except two, were returned to their pre-operative ambulatory status. Advanced directives were held by only 30.8% of patients on admission. There were 2 post-operative morbidities and 1 mortality. Conclusions: Centenarians represent a high-risk-surgical population due to their age and associated comorbidities. Hip fracture is the cause of >10% of all admissions and accounts for 29% of all surgical procedures in this age group. Despite their age and comorbidities, surgery for hip fracture is well tolerated and nearly all patients were returned to their pre-hospital ambulatory status. Education on advanced directives is lacking.

Share and Cite:

S. Patil, B. Parcells, A. Balsted and R. S. Chamberlain, "Surgical Outcome Following Hip Fracture in Patients > 100 Years Old: Will They Ever Walk Again?," Surgical Science, Vol. 3 No. 11, 2012, pp. 554-559. doi: 10.4236/ss.2012.311109.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] C. A. Krach, A. Victoria and U. S. Velkoff, “Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P23-199RV Centenarians in the United States,” US Government Printing Office, Washington, 1999.
[2] S. R. Cummings, S. M. Rubin and D. Black, “The Future of Hip Fractures in the United States. Numbers, Costs, and Potential Effects of Postmenopausal Estrogen,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 252, 1990, pp. 163-166.
[3] J. C. Scott, “Osteoporosis and Hip Fractures,” Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1990, pp. 717-740.
[4] S. E. Hall, J. A. Williams, J. A. Senior, P. R. Goldswain and R. A. Criddle, “Hip Fracture Outcomes: Quality of Life and Functional Status in Older Adults Living in the Community,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2000, pp. 327-332. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2000.tb00833.x
[5] J. A. Grisso, J. L. Kelsey, B. L. Strom, et al., “Risk Factors for Falls as a Cause of Hip Fracture in Women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 324, No. 19, 1991, pp. 1326-1331. doi:10.1056/NEJM199105093241905
[6] J. M. Hausdorff, D. A. Rios and H. K. Edelberg, “Gait Variability and Fall Risk in Community-Living Older Adults: A 1-Year Prospective Study,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 82, No. 8, 2001, pp. 1050-1056. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.24893
[7] M. C. Hornbrook, V. J. Stevens, D. J. Wingfield, J. F. Hollis, M. R. Greenlick and M. G. Ory, “Preventing Falls among Community-Dwelling Older Persons: Results from a Randomized Trial,” Gerontologist, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1994, pp. 16-23. doi:10.1093/geront/34.1.16
[8] M. C. Forster and D. Calthorpe, “Mortality Following Surgery for Proximal Femoral Fractures in Centenarians,” Injury, Vol. 31, No. 7, 2000, pp. 537-539. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(00)00049-8
[9] C. W. Oliver and C. Burke, “Hip Fractures in Centenarians,” Injury, Vol. 35, No. 10, 2004, pp. 1025-1030. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.004
[10] R. Verma, A. S. Rigby, C. J. Shaw and A. Mohsen, “Acute Care of Hip Fractures in Centenarians—Do We Need More Resources?” Injury, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2009, pp. 368-370. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2008.09.008
[11] G. Holt, D. Macdonald, M. Fraser and A. T. Reece, “Outcome after Surgery for Fracture of the Hip in Patients Aged over 95 Years,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 88, No. 8, 2006, pp. 1060-1064. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17398
[12] C. Ossendorf, M. J. Scheyerer, G. A. Wanner, H. P. Simmen and C. M. Werner, “Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients over 60 Years of Age—which Is the Ideal Modality of Primary Joint Replacement?” Patient Safety in Surgery, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2010, p. 16. doi:10.1186/1754-9493-4-16
[13] R. Hornby, J. G. Evans and V. Vardon, “Operative or Conservative Treatment for Trochanteric Fractures of the Femur. A Randomised Epidemiological Trial in Elderly Patients,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume, Vol. 71, No. 4, 1989, pp. 619-623.
[14] E. Krishnan, J. F. Fries and C. K. Kwoh, “Primary Knee and Hip Arthroplasty among Nonagenarians and Centenarians in the United States,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, Vol. 57, No. 6, 2007, pp. 1038-1042. doi:10.1002/art.22888
[15] M. P. van de Kerkhove, P. S. Antheunis, J. S. Luitse and J. C. Goslings, “Hip Fractures in Nonagenarians: Perioperative Mortality and Survival,” Injury, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2008, pp. 244-248. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2007.07.009
[16] J. E. Kenzora, R. E. McCarthy, J. D. Lowell and C. B. Sledge, “Hip Fracture Mortality. Relation to Age, Treatment, Preoperative Illness, Time of Surgery, and Complications,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 186, 1984, pp. 45-56.
[17] P. Haentjens, P. Autier, M. Barette and S. Boonen, “The Economic Cost of Hip Fractures among Elderly Women. A One-Year, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study with Matched-Pair Analysis. Belgian Hip Fracture Study Group,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 83, No. 4, 2001, pp. 493-500.
[18] Health Care Utilization Project Data on Outcome of Hip Fractures for the year 2008.
[19] C. L. Leibson, A. N. Tosteson, S. E. Gabriel, J. E. Ransom and L. J. Melton, “Mortality, Disability, and Nursing Home Use for Persons with and without Hip Fracture: A Population-Based Study,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 50, No. 10, 2002, pp. 1644-1650. doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50455.x
[20] The State Long-Term Health Care Sector. Characteristics, Utilization,and Government Funding: 2009 Update.
[21] L. J. Melton III, S. E. Gabriel, C. S. Crowson, A. N. Tosteson, O. Johnell and J. A. Kanis, “Cost-Equivalence of Different Osteoporotic Fractures,” Osteoporosis International, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2003, pp. 383-388. doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1385-4
[22] P. Haentjens, G. Lamraski and S. Boonen, “Costs and Consequences of Hip Fracture Occurrence in Old Age: An Economic Perspective,” Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 27, No. 18-19, 2005, pp. 1129-1141. doi:10.1080/09638280500055529
[23] R. S. Braithwaite, N. F. Col and J. B. Wong, “Estimating Hip Fracture Morbidity, Mortality and Costs,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2003, pp. 364-370.
[24] HCUPnet, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), “2004-2008 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,” Rockville, 2010. doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51110.x

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.