Intercropping barley with pea for agronomic and economic considerations in northern Ontario

Abstract

Intercropping, a mix of non-legume and legume crops, can improve crop yield and/or economic returns and reduce input costs. Field experiments (barley-pea intercrop) were conducted in 2008, 2010 and 2011 on an Oskondoga silt loam soil at Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, to determine the effect of intercropping barley (non-legume) and pea (legume) on grain yield, land equivalency ratio (LER), grain quality (protein concentration-PC), N uptake and economic returns. Barley and pea were grown as mono crops and in combinations as intercrops (both in the same row/and alternate rows). Nitrogen fertilizer was applied at 0, 40 and 80 kg·N·ha-1 to mono crop barley and at 0, 20 and 40 kg·N·ha-1 to barley-pea intercrop combinations. On an average of three years, application of 80 kg·N·ha-1 increased grain yield of barley by 846 kg·ha-1 as a sole crop and by 420 - 488 kg·ha-1 in the two intercropping combinations. Compared to barley and pea as sole crops, grain yield with barley-pea intercropping was greater by 266 kg·ha-1 with alternate row combination and by 223 kg·ha-1when both crops were grown in the same row. The LER values suggested 7% - 17% less land requirement for barley-pea intercropping than sole crops. Net returns from barley-pea intercropping without applied N greatly improved ($854 - $939 ha-1) compared to barley sole crop with 80 kg·N·ha-1($628 ha-1), although the net returns were highest for pea grown as a sole crop without applied N ($1141 ha-1). For barley as a sole crop, PC in grain increased with applied N. Compared to barley as sole crop with zero-N, PC in barley grain increased when barley was intercropped with pea. In barley-pea intercrop treatments, application of N fertilizer had no significant effect on PC in barley grain, although PC in pea grain was much higher than PC in barley grain. The response trends of total N uptake in grain were similar to grain yield. The findings suggest that pea or barley-pea intercropping could be an option for organic farming systems.

Share and Cite:

Sahota, T. and Malhi, S. (2012) Intercropping barley with pea for agronomic and economic considerations in northern Ontario. Agricultural Sciences, 3, 889-895. doi: 10.4236/as.2012.37107.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Jensen, E.S. (1996) Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant and Soil, 182, 25-38. doi:10.1007/BF00010992
[2] Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Ambus, P. and Jensen, E.S. (2001) Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops—A field study employing 32P technique. Plant and Soil, 236, 63-74. doi:10.1023/A:1011909414400
[3] Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. and Jensen, E.S. (2001) Evaluating pea and barley cultivars for complementarity in intercropping at different levels of soil N availability. Field Crops Research, 72, 185-196. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00176-9
[4] Szczukowski, S. (1989) Yield and seed quality of field peas grown in mixtures with cereals and in pure stands. Acta Academiae Agriculturae ac Technicae Olstenensis, Agricultura, 47, 40 p.
[5] Danso, S.K.A. and Papastylianou, I. (1992) Evaluation of the nitrogen contribution of legumes to subsequent cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, 119, 13-18. doi:10.1017/S0021859600071495
[6] Paolini, R., Caporali, F. and Campiglia, E. (1993) Yield response, complementarity and competitive ability of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) in mixtures. Agricoltura Mediterranea, 123, 114-121.
[7] Rauber, R., Schmidtke, K. and Kimpel-Freund, H. (2000) Competition and yield advantage in mixtures of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and oats (Avena sativa L.). Konkurrenz und ertragsvorteile in gemengen aus erbsen (Pisum sativum L.) und hafer (Arena sativa L.), 185, 33-47.
[8] Zielinska, A. and Rutkowski, M. (1988) Comparison of productivity of oats, barley and four cultivars of field peas in pure and mixed sowing. Acta Academiae Agriculturae ac Technicae Olstenensis, Agricultura, 46, 113-124.
[9] Hiebesch, C.K. and McCollum, R.E. (1987) Area × time equivalency ratio: A method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agronomy Journal, 79, 15-22. doi:10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900010004x
[10] De Wit, C.T. and van den Bergh (1965) Competition between herbage plants. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 13, 212-221.
[11] Szumigalski, A.R. and Van Acker, R.C. (2008) Land equivalent ratios, light interception, and water use in intercrops in the presence or absence of in-crop herbicides. Agronomy Journal, 100, 1145-1154. doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0343
[12] Helenius, J. (1991) Insect numbers and pest damage in intercrops vs. monocrops: Concepts and evidence from a system of faba bean, oats and Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera, Aphididae). Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 1, 57-80. doi:10.1300/J064v01n03_06
[13] Poggio, S.L. (2005) Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of field pea and barley. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 109, 48- 58. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.02.019
[14] Xiao, J., Zheng, Y., Tang, L., Li, L., Zhu, Y. and Yang, J. (2005) Effects of potassium and nitrogen supply on the occurrence of wheat rust in a wheat and faba bean intercropping system. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 20, 640-645.
[15] Chen, Y., Zhang, F., Tang, L., Zheng, Y., Li, Y., Christie, P. and Li, L. (2007) Wheat powdery mildew and foliar N concentrations as influenced by N fertilization and below- ground interactions with intercropped faba bean. Plant and Soil, 291, 1-13. doi:10.1007/s11104-006-9161-9
[16] Izaurralde, R.C., McGill, W.B. and Juma, N.J. (1992) Nitrogen fixation efficiency, interspecies N transfer, and root growth in barley-field pea intercrop on a Black Chernozemic soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 13, 11-16. doi:10.1007/BF00337231
[17] Tofinga, M.P., Paolini, R. and Snaydon, R.W. (1993) A study of root and shoot interactions between cereals and peas in mixtures. Journal of Agricultural Science, 120, 13-24. doi:10.1017/S0021859600073548
[18] Noel, R.J. and Hambleton, L.G. (1976) Collaborative study of a semi-automated method for the determination of crude protein in animal feeds. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 59, 134-140.
[19] SAS Institute, Inc. (2004) Online documentation for SAS, version 8. SAS Institite, Cary. http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/index.htmlH
[20] Anderson, M.K., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Ambus, P. and Jensen, E.S. (2004) Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrops. Plant and Soil, 266, 273-287. doi:10.1007/s11104-005-0997-1
[21] Cowell, L.E., Bremer, E. and van Kessel, C. (1989) Yield and N-2 fixation of pea and lentil as affected by intercropping and N application. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 69, 243-251. doi:10.4141/cjss89-025
[22] Chen, C., Westcott, M., Neil, K., Wichmann, D. and Knox, M. (2004) Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley-pea intercropping in Montana. Agronomy Journal, 96, 1730-1738. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.1730
[23] Knudson, M.T., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Jornsgaard, B. and Jensen, E.S. (2004) Comparison of interspecific competition and N use in pea-barley, faba bean-barley and lupin-barley intercrops grown at two temperate locations. Journal of Agricultural Science, 142, 617-627. doi:10.1017/S0021859604004745

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.