Share This Article:

Social Capital: Foundations and Some Social Policies in the EU

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:246KB) PP. 342-346
DOI: 10.4236/sm.2012.24045    4,351 Downloads   7,049 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

With this paper we want to show which three pillars are fundamental that lie within the social capital: trust, cooperation and the principle of general reciprocity. Some significant data about Abortion in the EU-27 and in the EU-15 awaken us to realize the existence of social phenomena’s that can undermine the social capital foundations and resent the people as well as the society, to the extent in which the social policies affect; trust, cooperation and the general principal of reciprocity. Finally, we suggest the promotion of public policies, the increase of public resources, as well as to launch campaigns to re-evaluate and rethink the personal and social importance of these foundations. We also see the necessity of avoiding the various manifestations that lead us to undermine these foundations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Rodríguez-Sedano, A. , Costa-Paris, A. & Aguilera, J. (2012). Social Capital: Foundations and Some Social Policies in the EU. Sociology Mind, 2, 342-346. doi: 10.4236/sm.2012.24045.

References

[1] Baron, S., Field, J., & y Schuller, T. (2000). Social capital: Critical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[2] Becker, G. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
[3] Bernal, A. (2008). Educational framework of personal relationships. In A. Bernal, F. Altarejos, & A. Rodriguez (Eds.), Family as primary educator. A sociological study. New York: Scepter Publishers, Inc.
[4] Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
[5] Bok, S. (1979). Lying: Moral choice in public and privaten life. New York: Vintage Books.
[6] Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social: Notes provisoires. Actes de la Recherche en Siences Sociales, 31, 2-3.
[7] Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Nueva York: Greenwood Press.
[8] Borgatti, S. P., Jones, C., & Everett, M. G. (1998). Network measures of social capital. Connections, 21, 27-36.
[9] Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
[10] Crosnoe, R. (2004). Social capital and the interplay of families and schools. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 267-280. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00019.x
[11] Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
[12] Fudenberg, D., & Maskin, E. (1986). The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica, 54, 533-556. doi:10.2307/1911307
[13] Furstenberg, F., & Hughes, M. E. (1993). Social capital and successful development among at-risk youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 580-592. doi:10.2307/353914
[14] Grootaert, C., & van Bastelaer, T. (2002). The role of social capital in development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511492600
[15] Hechter M. (1987). Principles of group solidarity. Berkeley: CA University of California Press.
[16] Hetherington, E. M. (1998). Social capital and the development of youth from nondivorced, divorced and remarried families. In W. A. Collins, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts (pp. 177-209). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[17] Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., Lochner, K., & y Polthrow-Stith, D. (1997). Social capital, income inequality and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1491-1498. doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.9.1491
[18] Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? Quarterly Journal of Economic, 112, 1251-1288. doi:10.1162/003355300555475
[19] Llano, C. (2002). Falacias y ámbitos de la creatividad: El acto de creación en la empresa. México: Limusa.
[20] Locke, J. (1954). Essays on the laws of nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[21] Lin, N. (1982). Social resources and instrumental action. In P. V. Marsden, & y N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 131-145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[22] Lin, N. (1990). Social resources and social mobility: A structural theory of status attainment. In R. L. Breiger (Ed.), Social mobility and social structure (pp. 247-271). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
[23] Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22, 28-51.
[24] Lin, N., Cook, K., y Burt, R. S. (2001). Social capital. Theory and research. Nueva York: Aldine de Gruyter.
[25] Lin, N. (2001). Social capital. A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815447
[26] Lomas, J. (1998). Social capital and health: Implications for public health and epidemiology. Social Science and Medicine, 47, 1181-1188. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00190-7
[27] Parcel, T. L., & Menaghan, E. G. (1993). Family social capital and children’s behavior problems. Social Psychology Quaterly, 56, 120-135. doi:10.2307/2787001
[28] Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78. doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002
[29] Putnam, R. (1996). The strange disappearance of civic America. The American Prospect, 24, 34-48.
[30] Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
[31] Schuller, T., Baron, S., & Field, J. (2000). Social capital: A review and critique. In Baron et al. (Eds.) Social capital: Critical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[32] Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51, 1-17.
[33] Sturgess, G. (1997). Taking social capital seriously. In A. Norton, M. Latham, G. Sturgess, & M. Stewart-Weekes (Eds). Social capital: The individual, civil society and the state. St. Leonards, NSW: Centre for Independent Studies.
[34] Taylor, M. (1982). Community, anarchy and liberty. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511607875
[35] The Witherspoon Institute (2006). Marriage and the public good: Ten principles. Princenton: New Jersey.
[36] Thomas, J. P., & Worrall. T. (2002). Gift-giving, quasi-credit and reciprocity. Rationality and Society, 14, 307-351. doi:10.1177/1043463102014003003
[37] Torsvik, G. (1999). Social capital and economic development: Searching for explanations. Bergen: University of Bergen.
[38] Torsvik, G. (2000). Social capital and economic development: A plea for the mechanisms. Rationality and Society, 12, 451-476. doi:10.1177/104346300012004005
[39] Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151-208. doi:10.1023/A:1006884930135
[40] Woolcock, M., & y Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15, 225-249. doi:10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
[41] Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. In B. M. Straw, & L. L. Cumming (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 53-111). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.