Bio-Based Paths to Prosperity for Small and Medium Forest Landowners: A Pilot Study in Southwest Louisiana

Roger Smithhart, Richard P. Vlosky, Michael Blazier, Paul Darby, Glenn Hughes, Dek Terrell

Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, USA.
Economics Department, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA.
Forestry Extension, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA.
Hill Farm Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, USA.
Louisiana Forest Products Development Center, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ojf.2012.24034                

Abstract

Forest biomass has great potential as a biofuel feedstock, but information on forest owner perceptions of using forest biomass to produce bioenergy is lacking. In this case study, we surveyed 3500 small to medium private forest landowners in southwestern Louisiana to better understand their attitudes and perceptions towards harvesting forest biomass for bioenergy production. Results indicate that landowners: 1) were positive about utilizing biomass for bioenergy, 2) believe viable biomass conversion technologies exist, 3) had antagonistic or neutral attitudes towards some technological, economic, and policy issues associated with using forest biomass for bioenergy due in part to lack of information or knowledge, and 4) felt biomass is a low-value product compared to traditional products. Landowners’ perceptions of participating in bio-based activities and markets vary among age and ownership size, and 51% of forest landowners were willing to participate in management activities specifically geared for bioenergy production.

Keywords

Small & Medium Non-Industrial Forest Landowners; Biomass; Business Potential; Louisiana

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Almquist, B. (2006). Environmental group perspectives on woody biomass utilization related to hazardous fuels reduction. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
[2]	Butler, J. B., & Leatherberry, C. E., (2004). America’s family forest owners. Journal of Forestry, 102, 4-14.
[3]	Conner, R. C., & Hartsell, A. J. (2002). Forest area and conditions. Southern forest resource assessment—Technical report (pp. 357402). Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station.
[4]	Conway, M., Gregory, C., Amacher, S., Sullivan, J., & Wear, D. (2003). Decisions nonindustrial forest landowners make: An empirical examination. Journal of Forest Economics, 9, 181-203. doi:10.1078/1104-6899-00034
[5]	de Hoop, C. (2006). Biomass energy resources in Louisiana. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Forest Products Development Center, LSU Agricultural Center.
[6]	Dillman, D. A. (2000). The tailored design method. New York, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[7]	Energy Information Administration (1992). Federal energy subsidies: Direct and indirect interventions in energy markets. EIA Service Report SR/EMEU/92-02.
[8]	Energy Information Administration (2009). Annual energy review. US department of energy. URL (last checked 20 March 2012). http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/overview.pdf.]
[9]	Hodgden, B., Cusack, C., & Tyrrell, M. (2003). Literature review: An annotated bibliography on family forest owners. In Sustaining family forests initiative wingspread conference: Yale program on private forests, Racine, 6-8 October 2003.
[10]	LSU AgCenter (2009). 2008 Louisiana summary of agriculture and natural resources. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center.
[11]	Measells, M. K., Stephen, C., Grado, H., Glenn, H., Michael, A., Dunn, J. I., & Zielinske, B. (2005). Non-industrial private forest landowner characteristics and use of forestry services in four southern states: results from a 2002-2003 mail survey. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 29, 194-199.
[12]	Oxarart, A. (2008). Exploring written communication techniques for complex natural resource issues. Gainsville, FL.
[13]	Perera, P. K. P. (2008). Non-industrial private forest landowners and US home center retailers’ attitudes and perceptions of forest certification, the school of renewable natural resources. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.
[14]	Perlack, R. D., Wright, L. L., Turhollow, A. F., Graham, R. L., Stokes, B. J., & Erbach, D. C. (2005). Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: The technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. US Department of Energy. doi:10.2172/885984
[15]	Prestemon, J. P., & Abt, R. C. (2002). The southern timber market to 2040. Journal of Forestry, 100, 16-22.
[16]	Shaw, D. S. (2009). Landowners’ knowledge, attitude, and aspirations towards woody biomass markets in north Carolina. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
[17]	United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2009). Census of agriculture. United States Department of Agriculture.
[18]	USDA (2009). President Obama issues presidential directive to USDA to expand access to biofuels. URL (last checked 14 December 2010). [e-mail].
[19]	USDA (2010). Biomass crop assistance program for FSA. URL (last checked 14 December 2010). http://www.apfo.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=ener&topic=bcap.
[20]	United States Department of Energy (USDOE) (2010). US department of energy: Energy efficiency and renewable energy.
[21]	Vlosky, R. P. (2000). Certification: Perceptions of non-industrial private forestland owners in Louisiana. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center.