Interactive Building


Distributed, networked, electronically tagged, interactive devices are increasingly incorporated into the physical environment blurring progressively the boundary between physical and virtual space. This changing relationship between physical and virtual implies not only a change in the operation and use of buildings but also a change in their physical configuration, and therefore, their design and production. Interactive building addresses, therefore both the building defined as physically built environment and the building process implying on the one hand the changing role of architecture with respect to incorporation of interactivity and the resulting multiple and varied use of built environments in reduced timeframes; On the other hand, it is implying the changing role of the architect with respect to the use of networks connecting digital databases and parametric models with customizable design and production tools allowing for linking design to production and use. This paper discusses both by presenting two case studies within the larger framework of interactive building.

Share and Cite:

H. Bier, "Interactive Building," Advances in Internet of Things, Vol. 2 No. 4, 2012, pp. 86-90. doi: 10.4236/ait.2012.24011.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] E. Aarts and S. Marzano, Eds., “The New Everyday— Views on Ambient Intelligence,” 010 Publishers, Rotter- dam, 2003.
[2] T. Gross, “Towards a New Human-Centred Computing Methodology for Cooperative Ambient Intelligence,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, pp. 31-42.
[3] K. Ashton, “That ‘Internet of Things’ Thing,” Radio Frequency Identification Journal, 2009.
[4] M. Novak, “Cognitive Cities: Intelligence, Environment and Space,” Intelligent Environments—Spatial Aspect of the Information Revolution, Elsevier, Oxford, 1997, pp. 386-420.
[5] E. Aarts, R. Harwig and M. Schuurmans, “Ambient Intelligence,” The Invisible Future: The Seamless Integration of Technology Into Everyday Life, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, 2001, pp. 235-250.
[6] M. Hosale and C. Kievid, “Modulating Territories, Penetrating Boundaries,” Digitally-Driven Architecture, 6th Footprint Issue, Stichting Footprint, Delft, 2010, pp. 55-68.
[7] M. Castells, “The Rise of the Network Society,” The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. 1, Blackwell Publishers, Malden, 1996.
[8] D. Russell and M. Weiser, “The Future of Integrated Design of Ubiquitous Computing in Combined Real and Virtual Worlds,” Proceedings of CHI-98, Los Angeles, 18-23 April 1998, pp. 275-276.
[9] W. Benjamin, “Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter Seiner Technischen Reproduzierbarkeit—Essenzen,” Suhrkamp Verlag, Berlin, 2006.
[10] L. Manovich, “The Language of New Media,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, 2001.
[11] D. Uckelmann, et al., “Autonomous Control and the Internet of Things: Increasing Robustness, Scalability and Agility in Logistic Networks,” Unique Radio Innovation for the 21st Century: Building Scalable and Global RFID Networks, Springer, Berlin, 2010, pp. 163-181. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03462-6_8
[12] H. Gellersen, M. Beigl and A. Schmidt, “Sensor-Based Context-Awareness for Situated Computing,” Workshop on Software Engineering and Pervasive Computing at ICSE 2000, Limerick, 2000.
[13] H. Bier and T. Knight, “Digitally-Driven Architecture,” In: H. Bier and T. Knight, Eds., 6th Footprint Issue, Stichting Footprint, Delft, 2010, pp. 1-4.
[14] D. Uckelmann1, M. Harrison and F. Michahelles, “An Architectural Approach towards the Future Internet of Things,” Architecting the Internet of Things, Springer, Berlin, 2011, pp. 1-24.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.