Spouses Who Donate Seem to Be the Winners – A Questionnaire Study of Kidney Donors Long-Term

Annette Lennerling, Abdul Rashid Qureshi, Ingela Fehrman-Ekholm

Baxter Novum, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Renal Department, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

DOI: 10.4236/ojneph.2012.23008                

Abstract

Background:Living donor kidney transplantations have been performed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden since 1965. In this study we wanted to explore the living kidney donor’s long-term experiences of the donation. Methods: Of 1110 consecutive living donors throughout 1965-2005, 823 were available for our questionnaire study. Results:Totally 692 replied to the questionnaire, 65% were females. The most common relation to the recipients was siblings (284), parents (262) and spouses (96). Time since donation was median 15 years (2 - 43). The initiative to donate came from the donors themselves in 69%. The dominating motives for donation were a wish to help, worries about the recipient not receiving a transplant and the knowledge that one could live a normal life with one kidney. The majority of the donors, felt well informed about potential risks both short-term and long-term. Depression post donation was reported by few donors, 2.3% and persisting pain by 4.3%. Comparisons between sibling donors and spouse donors show a significant difference (p < 0.0001) in the statements; If I donate a kidney “My quality of life will be better” and “The quality of life for the family will be better” more so for spouses. Also spouses seemed to be better informed about risks both for themselves and the recipients (p < 0.05). Conclusions:Our study shows that the donor population is in good psychosocial health. It is a positive progress that spouses can be living kidney donors - they seem to be the winners.

Keywords

Living Kidney Donors; Long-Term Follow-Up; Motives; Sibling; Spouse; Questionnaire

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	J. M. Cecka, “Kidney Transplantation in the United States,” Clinical Transplants, Terasaki Foundation Laboratory, Los Angeles, 2008, pp. 1-18
[2]	U. Heemann and L. Renders, “State of Living Kidney Donation in Europe,” Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2012, pp. 2166-2170. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfs144
[3]	L. Westlie, P. Fauchald, T. Talseth, A. Jacobsen and A. Flatmark, “Quality of Life in Norwegian Kidney Donors,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol. 8, No. 10, 1993, pp. 1146-1150.
[4]	E. M. Johnson, J. K. Anderso, C. Jacobs, et al., “Long- Term Follow-Up of Living Kidney Donors: Quality of Life after Donation,” Transplantation, Vol. 67, No. 5, 1999, pp. 717-721. doi:10.1097/00007890-199903150-00013
[5]	D. Ummel, M. Achille and J. Mekkelholt, “Donors and Recipients of Living Kidney Donation: A Qualitative Metasummary of Their Experiences,” Journal of Transplantation, Vol. 2011, No. 2011, pp. 1-11. doi:10.1155/2011/626501
[6]	S. G. Jowsey and T. D. Schneekloth, “Psychosocial Factors in living organ donation: clinical and Ethical Challenges,” Transplantation Reviews, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2008, pp. 192-195. doi:10.1016/j.trre.2008.04.008
[7]	A. Lennerling, I. Blohmé, O. Ostraat, H. L?nroth, M. Olausson and G. Nyberg, “Laparoscopic or Open Surgery for Living Donor Nephrectomy,” Nephrology Dialalysis Transplantation, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2001, pp. 383-386. doi:10.1093/ndt/16.2.383
[8]	I. Fehrman-Ekholm, N. Kvarnstr?m, J. Softeland, et al., “Post-Nephrectomy Development of Renal Function in Living Kidney Donors: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol. 26, No. 7, 2011, pp. 2377-2381. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr161
[9]	I. Fehrman-Ekholm, B. Brink, C. Ericsson, C. G. Elinder, F. Dunér and G. Lundgren, “Kidney Donors Don’t Regret. Follow-Up of 370 Donors in Stockholm since 1964,” Transplantation, Vol. 69, No. 10, 2000, pp. 2067-2071. doi:10.1097/00007890-200005270-00016
[10]	G. Mjoen, K. Stavern, L. Westlie, et al., “Quality of Life in Kidney Donors,” American Journal of Transplantation, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1315-1319. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03517.x
[11]	C. Fournier, N. Pallet, Z. Cherqaoui, et al., “Very Long-Term Follow-Up of Living Kidney Donors,” Transplant International, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01439.x
[12]	K. Clemens, N. Boudville, M. A. Dew, et al., “The Long-Term Quality of Life of Living Kidney Donors: A Multicenter Cohort Study,” American Journal of Transplantation, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2011, pp. 463-469. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03424.x
[13]	A. Lennerling, A. Forsberg, K. Meyer and G. Nyberg, “Motives for Becoming a Living Donor,” Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2004, pp. 1600-1605. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh138
[14]	J. Hardt, C. Jacobsen, J. Goldberg, R. Nickel and D. Buchwald, “Prevalence of chronic pain in a representative sample in the United States,” Pain Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 7, 2008, pp. 803-812. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00425.x
[15]	D. Schopflocher, P. Taenzer and R. Jovey, “The Prevalence of Chronic Pain in Canada,” Pain Research and Management, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2011, pp. 445-450.
[16]	M. Owen, P. Lorgelly and M. Serpell, “Chronic Pain Following Donor Nephrectomy—A Study of the Incidence, Nature and Impact of Chronic Post-Nephrectomy Pain,” European Journal of Pain, Vol. 14, No. 7, 2010, pp. 732-734. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.11.013
[17]	D. Dindo, N. Demartines and P. A. Clavien, “Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal with Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey,” Annals of Surgery, Vol. 240, No. 2, 2004, pp. 205-209.
[18]	The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, “Directive 2010/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on standards of Quality and Safety of Human Organs Intended for Transplantation, 2010,” 2010. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:207:0014:0029:EN:PDF