Share This Article:

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Investigations for Architectural Heritage Preservation: The Case of Habib Sakakini Palace, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:8584KB) PP. 189-197
DOI: 10.4236/ojg.2012.23019    5,887 Downloads   10,749 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

A comprehensive Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) investigations and hazard assessment for the rehabilitation and strengthening of Habib Sakakini’s Palace in Cairo is presented herein, which is considered one of the most significant architectural heritage sites in Egypt. The palace located on an ancient water pond at the eastern side of Egyptian gulf besiding Sultan Bebris Al-Bondoqdary mosque is a place also called “Prince Qraja al-Turkumany pond”. That pond had been filled down by Habib Sakakini at 1892 to construct his famous palace in 1897. The integrated geophysical survey of the palace allowed the identification of several targets of potential archaeological and geotechnical engineering interest buried in fill and silty clay in the depth range between 100 - 700 cm. the methodological development focused on Multi-Fold (MF) Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) imaging and subsurface characterization based on integrated velocity and attenuation analysis. Eight hundred sqm of Ground penetration Radar (GPR) profiling have been conducted to monitor the subsurface conditions. 600 meters are made in the surrounding area of the Palace and 200 sqm at the basement. The aim is to monitor the soil conditions beneath and around the Palace and to identify potential geological discontinuities, or the presence of faults and cavities. A suitable single and dual antenna are used (500 - 100 MHZ) is used to penetrate the desired depth of 7 meters (ASTM D6432). The GPR is used also detect the water table. At the building basement the GPR is used to identify the foundation thickness and soil-basement interface. As well as the inspection of cracks in some supporting columns, piers and masonry walls. The GPR also was used to investigate the floors and ceilings conditions and structural mapping. The results were validated by the geotechnical and structural surveys. All these results together with the seismic hazard analysis will be used for the complete analysis of the palace in the framework of the rehabilitation and strengthening works foreseen in a second stage.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

S. Hemeda, "Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Investigations for Architectural Heritage Preservation: The Case of Habib Sakakini Palace, Cairo, Egypt," Open Journal of Geology, Vol. 2 No. 3, 2012, pp. 189-197. doi: 10.4236/ojg.2012.23019.

References

[1] H. Becker and J. W. E. Fassbinder “Magnetic Prospecting in Archaeological Sites, Monuments and Sites, VI,” ICOMOS, Paris, 2001.
[2] A.T. Batayneh, A.A. Abueladas and K.A. Moumani, “Use of Ground Penetrating Radar for Assessment of Potential Sinkhole Conditions: An Example from Ghor al Haditha Area, Jordan,” Environmental Geology, Vol. 41, No. 8, 2002, pp. 977-983.
[3] L. B. Conyers and D. Goodman, “Ground Penetrating Radar: An Introduction for Archaeologists,” Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, 1997
[4] A. P. Annan and S. W. Cosway, “Ground Penetrating Radar Survey Design,” The Annual Meeting of SAGEEP, Chicago, 26-29 April 1992.
[5] B. W. Bevan, “The Search for Graves,” Geophysics, Vol. 56, No. 9, 1991, pp. 1310-1319.
[6] J. Mellet, “Location of Human Remains with Ground Penetrating Radar,” Special Paper No. 16, Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, 1992
[7] E. Forte and M. Pipan, “Integrated Seismic Tomography and ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) for the High Resolution Study of Burial Mounds (Tumil),” Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2008, pp. 2614-2623. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.04.024
[8] C. J. Vaughan, “Ground Penetrating Radar Surveys Used in archaeological Investigations,” Geophysics, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1986, pp. 595-604.
[9] D. Goodman, Y. Nishaimura and J. D. Rogers, “GPR Time-Slices in Archaeological Prospection,” Archaeological Prospection, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1992, pp. 85-89.
[10] M. Pipan, I. Finetti, A. Del Ben and F. Ferigo, “Recent Advances in the Multifold and 3D GPR Exploration of the Aquileia Archaeological Park (Italy),” The 58th Conference of European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Paper M020, Amsterdam, 1996.
[11] M. Pipan, I. Finetti and F. Ferigo, “Multi-Fold GPR Techniques with Applications to High-Resolution Studies: Two Case Histories,” European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1996, pp. 83-103.
[12] E. Forte, M. Pipan and A. Del Ben, “Integrated Geophysical Survey of the Medinet Madi Archaeological Site (Fayoum, Egypt),” Proceeding of the 4th International Congress on “Science and Technology for the Safeguard of Culture Heritage in the Mediterranean Basin”, Cairo, 6-8 December 2009, pp. 214-2018.
[13] A. P. Annan, “Practical Processing of GPR Data,” Sensors and Software, Ontario, 1999.
[14] K. J. Sandmeier, “ReflexW,” Version 4.0, Sandmeier Scientific Software, Karlsruhe, 2006.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.