A Semantic Model for Socially Aware Objects

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:218KB) PP. 47-55
DOI: 10.4236/ait.2012.23006    4,187 Downloads   9,118 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

The Internet of Things (IoT) assumes that things interact and exchange information thus defining the future of pervasive computing environments. The integration between people and interconnected objects realizes a new physical and social space and opens new frontiers in context awareness and objects adaptation. In this paper we investigate the possibility of creating socially aware objects able to interact not only among themselves but also with human beings sharing the same environment. The main contribution of this work is to provide a knowledge model for social context-awareness and reasoning using an ontology-based context modeling, a user model and exploiting of social networks. This model is part of a larger framework called So Smart that aims at empowering networks of interconnected objects with social context awareness in order to improve their social interaction with people.

Cite this paper

G. Biamino, "A Semantic Model for Socially Aware Objects," Advances in Internet of Things, Vol. 2 No. 3, 2012, pp. 47-55. doi: 10.4236/ait.2012.23006.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] A. Dey, “Understanding and using context,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Journal, 2001.
[2] L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, “The internet of things: A survey,” Comput. Netw., vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787–2805, Oct. 2010. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
[3] J. Bleecker, “A manifesto for networked objects cohabiting with pigeons, arphids and aibos in the internet of things (why things matter)”, in http://research.techkwondo.com/blog/julian/185, 2006.
[4] J. Xia, Feng; Ma, “Building smart communities with cyber-physical systems,” in ACM UBICOMP Symposium on Social and Community Intelligence (SCI), Beijing, China, September 2011.
[5] J. Kleinberg, S. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, and A. Tomkins, “The web as a graph: Measurements, models and methods,” in International Conf. on Combinatorics and Computing, 1999.
[6] T. Strang and C. Linnhoff-Popien, “Context modeling survey,” in In UbiComp-International Conf. on Ubiquitous Computing, 2004.
[7] R. Hoekstra, “Representing social reality in owl 2,” in International Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions OWLED, 2010.
[8] G. Biamino, “Modeling social contexts for pervasive computing environments,” in IEEE Int. Conf. PerCom. Workshop in Context Modeling and Reasoning, 2011.
[9] B. Cialdini, Robert, “Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.)”. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
[10] R. D. Alba, “A graph-theoretic definition of a sociometric clique,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1973.
[11] R. F. Bales, “A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction.” American Sociological Review, pp. 15, 257 263, 1950.
[12] C.E.LarsonandF.M.J.LaFasto,Teamwork:Whatmustgoright,what can go wrong. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1989.
[13] H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979.
[14] J. Searle, Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, 1969.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.