Duplex Stainless Steel Welds and their Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion

DOI: 10.4236/jmmce.2008.73019   PDF   HTML     11,085 Downloads   17,790 Views   Citations


Duplex stainless steels (DSS) as alternatives to conventional austenitic stainless steels for the construction of pipelines is becoming more wide-spread, particularly for sour service applications where corrosion resistance / stress corrosion cracking resistance is required in aggressive chloride /sulphide environments. While these steels show many superior characteristics, limitations are associated with the welding of these steels, particularly controlling the weld structure and properties and understanding how the weld metallurgy may influence the susceptibility to intergranular corrosion (IGC). The focus of this paper is to report on the findings from a detailed study of the various weld sections within a DSS pipeline, as a function of heat input and type of weld, in terms of the metallurgical structure, composition and mechanical properties and to assess the susceptibility to IGC. Welding was performed using the manual Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) technique at both high and low heat input conditions. Two different join configurations (double bevel single V bevel and double bevel single U joint configuration) were adopted. Structural analysis consisted of (i) optical microscopy of welded specimens; (ii) ferrite content determination; (iii) Vickers hardness measurements; (iv) Charpy impact studies and (v) transverse tensile testing. Two test methods namely a modified ASTM A262 and a modified Double Loop Electrochemical Potentiokinetic Reactivation (DL-ERP) test was used to determine susceptibility to IGC. The electrolyte solution used was 0.5M H2SO4 + 0.001 M TA (thioacetamide). The test was conducted at 60 °C. The potential was scanned from -500 mV (SCE) to +200 mV (SCE) and back to 500 mV (SCE) at a rate of 1.67 mV/s. The ratio of the reactivation charge to the passivation charge was calculated. From the results obtained it can be shown that the fill region was most susceptible to IGC for all weld conditions.

Share and Cite:

B. Gideon, L. Ward and G. Biddle, "Duplex Stainless Steel Welds and their Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion," Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, Vol. 7 No. 3, 2008, pp. 247-263. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2008.73019.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] V. Muthupandi, P. Bala Srinavasan, S.K. Seshadri and S. Sunderasen; Materials Science and Engineering A, Volume 358, issue 1-2, 15 October 2003.
[2] B.D. Craig, Sour Gas Design Consideration, SPE Monograph No. 15, 1993.
[3] M. Liljas, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Duplex Stainless Steels, Glasgow, Scotland, Keynote Paper V, vol. 2, 13–16 Nov 1994.
[4] A.J. Ramiraz, J.C. Lippold and S.D. Brandi, Metallurgical and Materials Transaction A, Vol. 34A, Aug 2003, pg. 1575-1597.
[5] N. Stephenson, Welding and Metal Fabrication, 55, 5 and 6, 1987, 159-164.
[6] R.N. Gun, Editor, Duplex Stainless Steels,: Microstructure, Properties and Applications, Abington Publishing, Cambridge, England, 1997.
[7] L. KARLSSON, L. RYEN, and S. PAK: Weld J , 1995974, 28s-40s.
[8] J.O. NILSSON and P. Lru: Mater. Sci. Technol., 1991979 (9), 853 - 862.
[9] A. RADJARVIIA, G. METuR, and M. GANTOIS: Proc. Conf. Duplex Stainless Steels '91, Beaune,France, October 1991, Societe Frangaise de Metallurgie et de Mat6riaux, 119-126.
[10] L. KARLSSON: Proc. Conf. Duplex Stainless Steels '97, Maastricht, The Netherlands, October 1997; Stainl. Steel World, 1997, 43-58.
[11] J.-O. NILSSON, L. KARLSSON, and J.-O. ANDERSSON: Mater. SCL. Technol., 1995, 119 (3),276-283.
[12] S. JANA: `Innovation stainless steel', 3.343-3.348; 1993, Florence, Associazione Italiana di Metallurgia.
[13] S. ATAMERT and J. E. KING: ACta. Metall, 1991, 399 273-285.
[14] H. J. Yu: Proc 4th Int. Conf. on Trends in Welding Research, 87-92; 1995, Materials Park, OH, ASM International.
[15] N.A. Mc Pherson, Y. Li and T.N. Baker, Science and Technology of Welding Journal, 2000,, Vol. 5, No. 4, pg 235-244.
[16] ASTM E562, Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count
[17] ASTM A370, Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products
[18] ASTM G108, Standard Test Method for Electrochemical React ivat ion (EPR) for Detect ing Sensi t izat ion of AISI Type 304 and 304L Stainless Steels
[19] S. Schultze, J. Gollner, K. Eick, P. Veit, I. Garz, “ The modified EPR test: A new tool for examination of corrosion susceptibility of duplex stainless steel”, Duplex ’97, Paper D97-067, KCI Publishing, Zutphen, The Netherlands (1997), p 639.
[20] A. Turnbull, P.E. Francis, A.J. Griffiths, E. Bennett, W. Nimmo, “Measurement of Corrosion Resistance of Super-Duplex Stainless Steel Welds by Electrochemical Techniques,” Eurocorr” 2000 (London, U.K.: Institute of Materials, 2000).
[21] E. Otero, C. Merino, C. Fosca, P. Fernandez, “Electrochemical Characterization of Secondary Phases in a Duplex Stainless Steel by EPR Test,” Duplex ’94, paper no. 56 (Cambridge, U.K.: TWI,1994).
[22] B.J. Ginn and T.G. Gooch: `Effect of Intermetallic Content on Pitting Resistance of Ferritic-Austenitic Stainless Steels', proc. conf. Stainless Steels'91 Science and market, Chia Laguna Sardinia, Italy, 1999, vol. 3, p. 81-89.
[23] L. Karlsson: 'Intermetallic Phase Precipitation in Duplex Stainless Steels and Weld Metals: Metallurgy, Influence on Properties and Testing Aspects', Welding in the World, vol. 43, no. 5, 1999.
[24] T. Amadou, C. Braham, and H. Sidhom; Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Vol. 35A, Nov. 2004—3499
[25] ASTM A262, Standard Practices for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Austenitic Stainless Steels
[26] Verneau, M., Lojewski, C. and Charles, J., “ Modified EPR test for duplex stainless steels surface contamination and microstructural investigation, Duplex ‘91, Les Editions de Physique, 1991, pp863-870.
[27] Merino, P., Novoa, X.R., Pena, G., Porto, E. and Espada, L., “Study of the intergranular corrosion susceptibility of duplex stainless steels using potentiokinetic reactivation tests (PRT), Duplex ’91, Les Editions de Physique, 1991, pp 871-875.
[28] Scully, J. R. and Kelly, R.G., Corrosion, 42 (1986), 537-542.
[29] Otero, E., Merino, C. Fosca, C. and Fernadez, P., “Electrochemical characterisation of secondary phases in a duplex stainless steel by EPR test”, Duplex ’94, TWI, 1994, Paper 56.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.