Diagnostic CT: Are Patients Adequately Informed?

DOI: 10.4236/act.2012.11001    5,008 Downloads   9,935 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

AIM: CT scanning is a widely utilised effective diagnostic tool. We aimed to establish whether patients are adequately informed prior to undergoing CT investigations. Methods: All adult patients with mental capacity attending the department for a CT study over a week period were invited to fill out a brief questionnaire prior to their scan. Results: 57 patients returned completed questionnaires. Overall 23% of patients were unsure or incorrect about the type of scan scheduled. Of patients attending with a new condition, 46% of them did not know their provisional diagnosis. Only 32 % of patients had insight into how a CT scan worked. This was taken to mean that the patient had included some reference to either x-rays, radiation or cross sectional imaging. Only 23% of patients were aware of potential complications of CT scans. Conclusion: Although written consent prior to CT scan is probably a step too far in providing patients with relevant risks/benefits of their investigation, we propose all patients undergoing CT have prior access to a written information sheet should they wish to be further informed regarding their procedure.

Cite this paper

Coyne, J., Brent, A. and O’Farrell, E. (2012) Diagnostic CT: Are Patients Adequately Informed?. Advances in Computed Tomography, 1, 1-4. doi: 10.4236/act.2012.11001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] M. Baerlocher and A. Detsky, “Discussing Radiation Risks Associated with CT Scans with Patients,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 304, No. 19, 2010, pp. 2170-2171. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1591
[2] S. Ahn, W. Mayo-Smith, et al., “Acute Nontraumatic Abdominal Pain in Adult Patients: Abdominal Radiography Compared with CT Evaluation,” Radiology, Vol. 225. No. 1, 2002, pp. 159-164. doi:10.1148/radiol.2251011282
[3] J. Brink, M. Goske and J. Patti, “Informed Decision Making Trumps Informed Consent for Medical Imaging with Ionizing Radiation,” Radiology, Vol. 262, No. 1, 2012, pp. 11-13. doi:10.1148/radiol.11111421
[4] R. Semelka, D. Armao, et al., “The Information Imperative: Is It Time for an Informed Consent Process Explaining the Risks of Medical Radiation?” Radiology, Vol. 262, No. 1, 2012, pp. 15-18. doi:10.1148/radiol.11110616
[5] “Good Practice Guide for Clinical Radiologists,” Royal College of Radiologists, London, 2012.
[6] W. Hendee, “Real and Perceived Risks of Medical Radiation Exposure,” Western Journal of Medicine, Vol. 138, 1983, pp. 380-386.
[7] M. Baerlocher and A. Detsky, “Informed Consent for Radiologic Procedures,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 305, No. 9, 2011, pp. 888-890.
[8] D. Larson, S. Rader, H. Forman and L. Fenton, “Original Research: Informing Parents about CT Radiation Exposure in Children: It’s OK to Tell Them,” American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 189, No. 2, 2007, pp. 271- 275.
[9] Clinical Radiology Patients’ Liaison Group (CRPLG) of The Royal College of Radiologists. London: The RCR, December 2010.
[10] Care Quality Commission, “Guidance about Compliance Essential Standards of Quality and Safety,” 2010.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.