Do Declining Neighborhood Economic Conditions Trump Hoped for School Renovation Renewal Benefit?

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine 1) individual student achievement, 2) teacher mobility rates, 3) perceptions of safety at school, and 4) student enrollment patterns, over time, in two recently renovated, same city, urban, No Child Left Behind compliant, Title I elementary school buildings located in close proximity neighborhoods one with improving the other with declining economic conditions. Achievement results indicated that fifth-grade students (n = 18) who attended a renovated school second-grade through fifth-grade in a neighborhood with improving economic conditions compared to fifth-grade students (n = 15) who attended a renovated school second-grade through fifth-grade in a neighborhood with declining economic conditions had statistically greater high stakes Reading Total and Math Total but not Language Total achievement test score improvement frequencies over time and statistically greater posttest-posttest Normal Curve Equivalent high stakes achievement test score comparisons for Reading Total, Math Total, and Language Total. Differing neighborhood economic conditions had no statistical effect on reported teacher, student, and parent perceptions of school safety or teacher mobility rates, however, enrollment in the renovated school in the neighborhood with declining economic conditions dropped significantly. We conclude that declining neighborhood economic conditions trumped hoped for school renovation renewal benefit. School closing policy and student open enrollment transfer options are discussed.

Share and Cite:

Grice, C. , Hill, J. & Hayes, K. (2012). Do Declining Neighborhood Economic Conditions Trump Hoped for School Renovation Renewal Benefit?. Advances in Applied Sociology, 2, 102-110. doi: 10.4236/aasoci.2012.22014.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Ainsworth, J. W. (2002). Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational attainment. Social Forces, 8, 117-152. doi:10.1353/sof.2002.0038
[2] Anyon, J., Sadovinik, A. R., & Semel, S. F. (2001). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. Educational Researcher, 30, 27-32.
[3] Argon, J. (2008). 37th Annual maintenance and operation cost study: Schools. American School and University, 80, 21-28.
[4] Arsen, D., & Davis, T. (2006). Taj Mahals or decaying shacks: Patterns in local school capital stock and unmet capital need. Peabody Journal of Education, 81, 1-22. doi:10.1207/s15327930pje8104_1
[5] Barton, A. C., Drake, C., Perez, J. G., St. Louis, K., & George, M. (2004). Ecologies of parental engagement in urban education. Educational Researcher, 33, 3-12. doi:10.3102/0013189X033004003
[6] Baskerville, S. (2008). From welfare state to police state. The Independent Review, 12, 401-422.
[7] Brandon, R. R. (2007). African American parents: improving connections with their child’s educational environment. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 116-120.
[8] Breitborde, M. (2002). Lessons learned in an urban school: Preparing teachers for the educational village. The Teacher Educator, 38, 34- 46. doi:10.1080/08878730209555305
[9] Bryan, J. (2005). Fostering educational resilience and achievement in urban schools through school-family-community partnerships. Journal of Professional School Counseling, 8, 219-227.
[10] Burke, R. W. (2002). Social and emotional education in the classroom. Kappa Delta Pi, 38, 108-111.
[11] Burkhauser, R. V., & Sabia, J. J. (2007). The effectiveness of minimum wage increases in reducing poverty: Past, present and future. Economic Policy, 25, 262-281.
[12] Crew, R. (2007). Only connect: The way to save our schools. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
[13] Crowley, S. (2003). The affordable housing crisis: Residential mobility of poor families and school mobility of poor children. Journal of Negro Education, 72, 22-38. doi:10.2307/3211288
[14] Davis, B. (2006). How to teach students who don’t look like you: Culturally relevant teaching strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
[15] Earls, F. (2000). Urban poverty: Scientific and ethical considerations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 572, 53-65. doi:10.1177/0002716200572001009
[16] Epstein, J., Sanders, M., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2002). School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Your Handbook for Action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
[17] Frankenberg, E., & Lee, C. (2002). Race in American public schools: Rapidly resegregating school districts. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
[18] Gehrke, R. S. (2005). Poor schools, poor students, successful teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42, 14-17.
[19] Godwin, K. R., Leland, S. M., Baxter, A. D, & Southworth, S. (2006). Sinking swann: Public school choice and the resegregation of Charlotte Public Schools. Review Policy Research, 23, 983-997. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00246.x
[20] Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. W. (2001). The sprawl debate: Let markets plan. Publius, 31, 131-149. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004901
[21] Green, G. (2007). Bullying: A concern for survival. Education, 128, 333-336.
[22] Haley-Lock, A., & Shah, M. F. (2007). Protecting vulnerable workers: How public policy and private employers shape the contemporary low-wage work experience. Families in Society, 88, 485-495.
[23] Hall, P. S. (2005). Bullying and the teacher. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 72, 45-49.
[24] Haws, M. A., & Tennille, S. (2005). Addressing bullying in school: What can educators and parents do to create a safe environment. International Journal of Humanities and Peace, 21, 14-18.
[25] Hirsch, E. J., Lewis-Palmer, T., Sugai, G., & Schnacker, (2004). Using school bus discipline referral data in decision-making: Two case studies. Preventing School Failure, 48, 4-9. doi:10.3200/PSFL.48.4.4-9
[26] Jacob, B. A. (2004). Public housing, housing vouchers, and student achievement: Evidence from public housing demolition in Chicago. American Economics Review, 94, 16-19. doi:10.1257/000282804322970788
[27] Jones, S. E., Brener, N. D., & McManus, T. (2003). Prevalence of school policies, programs, and facilities that promote a healthy physical school environment. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1570-1575. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1570
[28] Kinlock, T. W., Battejes, R. J., & Gordon, M. S. (2004). Factors associated with criminal severity among adolescents ending substance abuse treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 293-318. doi:10.1177/002204260403400203
[29] Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities. New York, NY: Crown Publishing.
[30] Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation. New York, NY: Crown Publishing.
[31] Lawhon, L. L. (2003). Planners’ perceptions of their role in socially responsive neighborhood design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 20, 153-163.
[32] Lunenburg, F., & Irby, B. J. (2002). Parent involvement: A key to student achievement. Huntsville, TX: Sam Houston State University.
[33] McLean, R. (2003). Seven red herrings: The opposition to closure of aging urban schools. Clearing House, 76, 140-145. doi:10.1080/00098650309601990
[34] Meredith, J. R. (2003). Sprawl and the new urbanist isolution. Virginia Law Review, 89, 447-503. doi:10.2307/3202437
[35] National Education Association (2004). Culture abilities resilience effort: Strategies for closing the achievement gaps. Washington DC: National Education Association.
[36] Nebraska State Statute 79-2104 (2010).
[37] Nichols, L., & Gault, B. (2003). The implication of welfare reform for housing and school instability. Journal of Negro Education, 72, 104- 116. doi:10.2307/3211294
[38] Omaha Public Schools (2004). Safe and secure learning environments: Best practices of the Omaha Public Schools to support the social, emotional, and behavioral success of all students: Omaha Public Schools.
[39] Pettit, B. (2004). Moving and children’s social connections: Neighborhood context and the consequences of moving for low-income families. Sociological Forum, 19, 61-79. doi:10.1023/B:SOFO.0000031983.93817.ff
[40] Picus, L. O., Marion, S. F., Calvo, N., & Glenn, W. J. (2005). Understanding the relationship between student achievement and the quality of educational facilities: Evidence from Wyoming. Peabody Journal of Education, 80, 71-95. doi:10.1207/s15327930pje8003_5
[41] Plybon, L. E., & Kliewer, W. (2001). Neighborhood types and externalizing behavior in urban school-age children: Tests of direct, mediated, and moderated effects. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 419-437. doi:10.1023/A:1016781611114
[42] Polakow, V., & Pettigrew, S. (2006). Radical possibilities. Educational Studies, 40, 322-327.
[43] Rankin, B. H., & Quane, J. M. (2000). Neighborhood poverty and the social isolation of inner-city African American families. Social Forces, 79, 139-154. doi:10.1093/sf/79.1.139
[44] Ratner, H. H., Chiodo, C., Covington, C., Sokol, R. J., & Ager, J. (2006). Violence exposure, academic performance, and children’s perception of safety: Evidence of protective effects. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 264-287. doi:10.1353/mpq.2006.0017
[45] Reid, C. (2007). Back to school: Prioritizing education in community development efforts. Community Investments, Fall, 3-30.
[46] Secombe, K. (2002). “Beating the odds” versus “changing the odds”: Poverty, resilience, and family policy. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 384-394. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00384.x
[47] Sinha, V., Payne, M. R., & Cook, T. D. (2005). A multidimensional approach to understanding neighborhood schools and their impact. Urban Education, 40, 627-662. doi:10.1177/0042085905281393
[48] Storch, E. A., Krain, A. L., Kovacs, A. H., & Barlas, M. E. (2002). The relationships of communication beliefs and abilities to peer victimization in elementary school children. Child Study Journal, 32, 231- 240.
[49] Taylor, J. (2005). Achieving excellence in urban schools: Pitfall, pratfalls, and evolving opportunities. Achieving Excellence in Schools, 56, 259-283.
[50] Thompson, G. L. (2003). No parent left behind—Strengthening ties between educators and African American parents/guardians. Urban Review, 35, 7-23. doi:10.1023/A:1022589405679
[51] Tolnay, S. E., Crowder, K. D., & Adelman, R. M. (2000). “Narrow and filthy alleys of the city”? The residential settlement patterns of black southern migrants to the north. Social Forces, 78, 989-1015. doi:10.2307/3005939
[52] Towns, D. P., Cole-Henderson, B., & Serpell, Z. (2000). The journey to urban school success: Going the extra mile. The Journal of Negro Education, 70, 4-18.
[53] Trotman, M. F. (2001). Involving the African American parent: Recommendations to increase the level of parent involvement within African American families. Journal of Negro Education, 70, 275- 285. doi:10.2307/3211280
[54] Varady, D. P., Raffel, J. A., Sweeney, S., & Denson, L. (2005). Attracting middle-income families in the Hope VI public housing revitalization program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27, 149-164. doi:10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00229.x
[55] Viteritti, J. P. (2005). School choice: How an abstract idea became a reality. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings Papers on Educational Policy (pp. 137-173). Washington DC: Brookings Institute Press.
[56] Warren, M. R. (2005). Communities and schools: A new view of urban education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 75, 133-173.
[57] Weisberg, R. P., & O’Brien, M. U. (2004). What works in school-based social and emotional learning programs for positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 591, 86-97. doi:10.1177/0002716203260093

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.