Protease Inhibitors in Wild Relatives of Pigeonpea against the Cotton Bollworm/Legume Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera

Vinod D. Parde, Hari C. Sharma, Manvendra S. Kachole

Department of Biochemistry, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, India.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India.

DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2012.35076                

Abstract

Cotton bollworm/legume pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera is one of the most damaging pests worldwide. Be-cause of the difficulties associated with chemical control of this pest, emphasis has been placed on developing transgenic plants with resistance to H. armigera. Since toxin genes from the bacterium, Bacillus thuringien-sis (Bt) have been deployed on a large scale, there is need to scout for alternate genes which could be deployed alone or in combination with the Bt genes for pest management. Therefore, we evaluated the wild relatives of pigeonpea, which have shown high levels of resistance to this pest, for the protease inhibitors (PIs) under in vivo and in vitro inhibitions. Accessions belonging to Cajanus albicans, C. cajanifolius, C. sericeus, Flemingia bracteata, and Rhynchosia bracteata showed complete inhibition of H. armigera gut proteinases (HaGPs). Some of the C. scarabaeoides accessions (ICPW 116, 152, 278 and 280) exhibited partial inhibition at low concentrations of the PIs. All accessions of wild relatives of pigeonpea showed high to moderate level of inhibition at pH 7.8. Cultivated pigeonpea, ICPL 87 exhibited monomorphism in terms of trypsin inhibitor (TI) and chymotrypsin inhibitor (CTI) isoforms, contrary to the diverse inhibitory profiles of wild pigeonpeas. Cajanus albicans, C. platycarpus, C. scarabaeoides, and R. bracteata showed more number of TI and CTI bands than the cultivated pigeonpea. Protease inhibitor isoforms of wild relatives of pigeonpea showed significant variation in number, band pattern, and protein specificities towards trypsin, chymotrypsin, and H. armigera gut proteinases (HaGPs) as compared to the cultivated pigeonpea. The PIs from the wild relatives of pigeonpea showed considerable potential against the HaGPs, and could be considered as potential candidates for use in genetic transformation of crops for pest management, including H. armigera.

Keywords

Wild Relatives; Pigeonpea; Protease Inhibitors; Helicoverpa armigera; Transgenic Plants; Pest Management

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	R. Mueller and J. K. P. Weder, “Isolation and Characterization of Two Trypsin-Chymotrypsin Inhibitors from Lentil Seeds (Lens culinaris Medik),” Journal of Food Biochemistry, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1989, pp. 39-63. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4514.1989.tb00384.x
[2]	U. Singh and B. O. Eggum, “Factors Affecting the Protein Quality of Pigeonpea Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.),” Qual Plantarum/Plant Food for Human Nutrition, Vol. 34, 1984, pp. 251-261.
[3]	W. Reed and S. S. Lateef, “The Pigeonpea,” CAB International, Wallingford, 1990, pp. 349-374.
[4]	H. C. Sharma, “Cotton Bollworm/Legume Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera): Biology and Management. Crop Protection Compendium,” Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau International, Oxon, 2001.
[5]	K. R. Kranthi, D. R. Jadhav, S. Kranthi, R. R. Wanjari, S. S. Ali and D. A. Russell, “Insecticide Resistance in Five Major Insect Pests of Cotton in India,” Crop Protection, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2002, pp. 449-460. doi:10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00131-4
[6]	H. C. Sharma, “Heliothis/Helicoverpa Management: Emerging Trends and Strategies for Future Research,” Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, 2005.
[7]	P. W. C. Green, H. C. Sharma, P. C. Stevenson and M. S. J. Simmonds, “Susceptibility of Pigeonpea and Some of Its Wild Relatives to Predation by Helicoverpa armigera: Implications for Breeding Resistant Cultivars,” Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 57, No. 7, 2006, pp. 831-836. doi:10.1071/AR05281
[8]	H. C. Sharma, G. Sujana and D. Manohar Rao, “Morphological and Chemical Components of Resistance to Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera in Wild Relatives of Pigeonpea,” Arthropod-Plant Interactions, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2009, pp. 151-161. doi:10.1007/s11829-009-9068-5
[9]	G. Sujana, H. C. Sharma and D. Manohar Rao, “Antixenosis and Antibiosis Components of Resistance to Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera in Wild Relatives of Pigeonpea,” International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, Vol. 28, 2008, pp. 191-200.
[10]	L. Jouanin, M. Bonade-Bottino, C. Girard, G. Morrot and M. Giband, “Transgenic Plants for Insect Resistance,” Plant Science, Vol. 131, No. 1, 1998, pp. 1-11. doi:10.1016/S0168-9452(97)00239-2
[11]	U. Singh, K. C. Jain, R. Jambunathan and D. G. Faris, “Nutritional Qualities of Vegetable Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.): Mineral and Trace Elements,” Journal of Food Science, Vol. 49, No. 2, 1984, pp. 645-646. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb12489.x
[12]	N. P. Chougule, V. K. Hivrale, P. J. Chhabda, A. P. Giri and M. S. Kachole, “Differential Inhibition of Helicoverpa armigera Gut Proteinases by Proteinase Inhibitors of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and Its Wild Relatives,” Phytochemistry, Vol. 64, No. 3, 2003, pp. 181-187. doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00375-3
[13]	R. Bressani and L. G. Elias, “The Nutritional Role of Polyphenols in Beans,” In: J. H. Hush, Ed., Polyphenols in Cereals and Legumes, St. Louis, 1979, pp. 61-68.
[14]	F. Grant, L. J. More, N. H. McKenzie, J. C. Stewart and A. Pusztai, “A Survey of the Nutritional and Hemagglutination Properties of Legume Seeds Generally Available in the UK,” British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1983, pp. 207-214. doi:10.1079/BJN19830090
[15]	N. P. Chougule, A. P. Giri, V. K. Hivrale, P. J. Chhabda and M. S. Kachole, “Identification of Amylase Inhibitor Deficient Mutants in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millisp.),” Biochemical Genetics, Vol. 42, No. 5-6, 2004, pp. 165-180. doi:10.1023/B:BIGI.0000026632.17713.47
[16]	S. A. Godbole, T. G. Krishna and C. R. Bhatia, “Further Characterization of Protease from Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp) Seed,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Vol. 64, No. 3, 1994, pp. 331-335. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740640314
[17]	E. R. Prasad, A. Dutta-Gupta and K. Padmasree, “Inhibitors from Pigeonpea Active against Lepidopteran Gut Proteinases,” Journal of Economic Entomology, Vol. 102, No. 6, 2009, pp. 2343-2349. doi:10.1603/029.102.0641
[18]	P. K. Ranjekar, A. Patankar, V. Gupta, R. Bhatanagar, J. Bentur and P. A. Kumar, “Genetic Engineering of Crop Plants for Insect Resistance,” Current Science, Vol. 84, 2003, pp. 321-329.
[19]	V. D. Parde, H. C. Sharma and M. S. Kachole, “In Vivo Inhibition of Helicoverpa armigera Gut Pro-Proteinase Activation by Non-Host Plant Protease Inhibitors,” Journal of Insect Physiology, Vol. 56, No. 9, 2010, pp. 1315-1324. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.04.003
[20]	O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr and R .J. Randall, “Protein Measurement with Folin Phenol Reagent, ” Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 193, 1951, pp. 265-275.
[21]	M. M. Pichare and M. S. Kachole, “Detection of Electrophoretically Separated Proteinase Inhibitors Using X-Ray ?lm,” Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysical Methods, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1994, pp. 215-224. doi:10.1016/0165-022X(94)90018-3
[22]	M. Belew and J. Porath, “Extracellular Proteinase from Penicillium natatum,” Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 19, 1970, pp. 576-581. doi:10.1016/0076-6879(70)19045-8
[23]	B. F. Erlanger, N. Kokowesky and W. Cohen, “The Preparation and Properties of Two New Chromogenic Substrates of Trypsin,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Vol. 95, No. 2, 1964, pp. 271-278. doi:10.1016/0003-9861(61)90145-X
[24]	S. S. Ambekar, S. C. Patil, A. P. Giri and M. S. Kachole, “Proteinaceous Inhibitors of Trypsin and of Amylases in Developing and Germinating Seeds of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.),” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Vol. 72, No. 1, 1996, pp. 57-62. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199609)72:1<57::AID-JSFA622>3.0.CO;2-D
[25]	A. P. Giri and M. S. Kachole, “Amylase Inhibitors of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Seeds,” Phytochemistry, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1998, pp. 197-202. doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(97)00570-0
[26]	D. P. Bown, H. S. Wilkinson and J. A. Gatehouse, “Differentially Regulated Inhibitor Sensitive and Insensitive Protease Genes from the Phytophagous Pest, Helicoverpa armigera, Are Members of Complex Multigene Families,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vol. 27, No. 7, 1997, pp. 625-638. doi:10.1016/S0965-1748(97)00043-X
[27]	A. P. Giri, A. M. Harsulkar, V. V. Deshpande, M. N. Sainani, V. S. Gupta and P. K. Ranjekar, “Chickpea Defensive Proteinase Inhibitors Can Be Inactivated by Pod Borer Gut Proteinases,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 116, No. 1, 1998, pp. 393-401. doi:10.1104/pp.116.1.393
[28]	A. M. Harsulkar, A. P. Giri, A. G. Patankar, V. S. Gupta, M. N. Sainani, P. K. Ranjekar and V. V. Deshpande, “Successive Use of Non-Host Plant Proteinase Inhibitors Required for Effective Inhibition of Gut Proteinases and Larval Growth of Helicoverpa armigera,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 121, No. 2, 1999, pp. 497-506. doi:10.1104/pp.121.2.497
[29]	A. G. Patankar, A. M. Harsulkar, A. P. Giri, V. S. Gupta, M. N. Sainani, P. K. Ranjekar and V. V. Deshpande, “Diversity in Inhibitors of Trypsin and Helicoverpa armigera Gut Proteinases in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and Its Wild Relatives,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 99, No. 3-4, 1999, pp. 719-726.
[30]	A. G. Patankar, A. P. Giri, A. M. Harsulkar, M. N. Sainani, V. V. Deshpande, P. K. Ranjekar and V. S. Gupta, “Complexity in Specificities and Expression of Helicoverpa armigera Gut Proteinases Explains Polyphagous Nature of the Insect Pest,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vol. 31, No. 4-5, 2001, pp. 453-464. doi:10.1016/S0965-1748(00)00150-8
[31]	V. D. Parde, H. C. Sharma and M. S. Kachole, “Inhibition of Helicoverpa armigera Gut Pro-Proteinase Activation in Response to Synthetic Protease Inhibitors,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, Vol. 142, No. 2, 2012, pp. 104-113. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01209.x
[32]	K. A. Johnston, M. J. Lee, J. A. Gatehouse and J. H. Anstee, “The Partial Puri?cation and Characterization of Serine Protease Activity in Midgut of Larval Helicoverpa armigera,” Insect Biochemistry, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1991, pp. 389-397. doi:10.1016/0020-1790(91)90005-Y
[33]	J. P. Purcell, J. P. Greenplate and S. R. Douglas, “Examination of Midgut Luminal Proteinase Activities in Six Economically Important Insects,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1992, pp. 41-47. doi:10.1016/0965-1748(92)90098-Y
[34]	M. J. Chrispeels and N. V. Raikhel, “Lectins, Lectin Genes, and Their Role in Plant Defense,” The Plant Cell, Vol. 3, 1991, pp. 1-9.
[35]	W. R. Terra and C. Ferreira, “Insect Digestive Enzymes: Properties, Compartmentalization and Function,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Vol. 109B, 1994, pp. 1-62.
[36]	S. Mazumdar-Leighton, C. R. Babu and J. Bennett, “Identi?cation of Novel Serine Proteinase Gene Transcripts in the Midgets of Two Tropical Insect Pests, Scripophaga insertulas (Wlk.) and Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.),” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vol. 30, No. 1, 000, pp. 57-68. doi:10.1016/S0965-1748(99)00097-1