Clinical Evaluation of an Oral Electrolyte Solution Formulated Based on Strong Ion Difference (SID) and Using Propionate as the Organic Anion in the Treatment of Neonatal Diarrheic Calves with Strong Ion Acidosis

Abstract

Background: It is postulated that the concentrations of the major strong ions (Na, K, and Cl) in oral electrolyte solutions play a major role in clinical efficacy of these solutions for rehydration and corrections of metabolic acid base derangements. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to test prospectively the efficacy of an OES (OESexp) formulated based on concentration of strong ion difference (SID) and propionate in a group of calves with naturally occurring neonatal diarrhea and clinically detectable dehydration and acid base abnormalities. Animals: Ten client owned calves of varying breeds, 2 - 22 days old, presented to a veterinary teaching hospital with a history of naturally occurring acute undifferentiated diarrhea, progressive depression and dehydration for treatment. Methods: Clinical and laboratory parameters were measured pre and post two oral electrolyte treatments to assess efficacy of the experimental OES to correct clinical and clinico pathological parameters. For the clinical trial the calves served as their own controls. For control of safety of medication 4 normal calves were force fed 4 L of OESexp and followed over a 24 hour period. Results: All calves had severe diarrhea and metabolic acidosis. The metabolic acidosis observed in the plasma of these calves and reflected by pH, HCO3- SID and base deficit was corrected significantly towards reference ranges (p < 0.05) with two 2 L feedings 12 hours apart. Dehydration was significantly corrected and all calves were discharged 1 - 3 days post admission. Conclusion and Clinical Importance: The use of SID is a valid approach when formulating oral electrolytes solutions for use in calves with acute diarrhea and metabolic derangement. Sodium propionate is valid substitute for commonly used sodium base equivalents in North America in oral electrolyte solutions.

Share and Cite:

H. Stampfli, O. Oliver and J. Pringle, "Clinical Evaluation of an Oral Electrolyte Solution Formulated Based on Strong Ion Difference (SID) and Using Propionate as the Organic Anion in the Treatment of Neonatal Diarrheic Calves with Strong Ion Acidosis," Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2012, pp. 34-39. doi: 10.4236/ojvm.2012.21006.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] G. W. Smith, “Treatment of Calf Diarrhea: Oral Fluid Therapy,” Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2009, pp. 55-72. doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2008.10.006
[2] P. D. Constable, “Fluid and Electrolyte Therapy in Ruminants,” Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2003, pp. 557-597.
[3] A. R. Michell, “Oral Rehydration for Diarrhoea: Symptomatic Treatment or Fundamental Therapy,” Journal of Comparative Pathology, Vol. 118, No. 3, 1998, pp. 175- 193. doi:10.1016/S0021-9975(05)80125-2
[4] A. R. Michell, H. W. Brooks, D. G. White and A. J. Wagstaff, “The Comparative Effectiveness of Three Commercial Oral Solutions in Correcting Fluid, Electrolyte and Acid-Base Disturbances Caused by Calf Diarrhea,” British Veterinary Journal, Vol. 148, No. 6, 1992, pp. 507-522.
[5] I. Lorenz, “D-Lactic Acidosis in Calves,” The Veterinary Journal, Vol. 179, No. 2, 2009, pp. 197-203. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.08.028
[6] P. A. Stewart, “How to Understand Acid-Base: A Quantitative Acid-Base Primer for Biology and Medicine,” Elsevier, New York, 1981
[7] P. D. Constable, P. G. Walker, D. E. Morin and J. H. Foreman, “Clinical and Laboratory Assessment of Hydration Status of Neonatal Calves with Diarrhea,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Vol. 212, No. 7, 1998, pp. 991-996.
[8] J. M. Naylor, L. Petrie, M. I. Rodriguez and P. Skilnick, “A Comparison of Three Oral Electrolyte Solutions in the Treatment of Diarrheic Calves,” The Canadian Veterinary Journal, Vol. 31, No. 11, 1990, pp. 753-760.
[9] G. E. Rumbaugh, A. A. Ardans, D. Ginno and A. Trommershausen-Smith, “Measurement of Neonatal Equine Immunoglobulins for Assessment of Colostral Immunoglobulin Transfer: Comparison of Single Radial Immunodiffusion with the Zinc Sulfate Turbidity Test, Serum Electrophoresis, Refractometry for Total Serum Protein, and the Sodium Sulfite Precipitation Test,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Vol. 172, No. 3, 1978, pp. 321-325.
[10] P. D. Constable, H. R. Stampfli, H. Navetat, et al., “Use of a Quantitative Strong Ion Approach to Determine the Mechanism for Acid-Base Abnormalities in Sick Calves with or without Diarrhea,” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005, pp. 581-589.
[11] C. Demigné, C. Rémés, F. Chartier and D. Kaligis, “Utilization of Volatile Fatty Acids and Improvement of Fluid Therapy for Treatment of Dehydration in Diarrheic Calves,” Annals of Veterinary Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1983, pp. 541-547.
[12] P. D. Constable, “Hyperchloremic Acidosis: the Classic Example of Strong Ion Acidosis,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol. 96, No. 4, 2003, pp. 919-922.
[13] P. J. DeGaris, D. M. McNeil and E. Block, “Hypocalcemia in Dairy Cows: Meta-Analysis and Dietary Cation Anion Difference Theory Revisited,” Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 89, No. 2, 2006, pp. 669-684. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72130-0

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.