The Effects of Silvicultural Thinning and Lymantria Dispar L. Defoliation on Wood Volume Growth of Quercus spp.

Mary Ann Fajvan, Kurt W. Gottschalk

USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Morgantown, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2012.32033                

Abstract

Pre- and post-defoliation radial growth rates were used to examine the effects of silvicultural thinning and two consecutive years of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) defoliation on Quercus spp. wood volume production. In the first phase of the study, tree rings from 65 dissected stems, were used to develop polynomial models to estimate annual cumulative volume (m³) increment for the entire merchantable stem, as a function of dbh (tree diameter at 1.37 m above the ground). In Phase II of the study, 81 additional trees were sampled using only increment cores. Cumulative diameter increments from the cores were used in the polynomial models to compare tree volume growth changes during and after defoliation among the thinning treatments. Even though there was no significant difference in estimated volume lost during defoliation among treatments, post-defoliation growth was enhanced by thinning. Total volume reduction from defoliation ranged from 28,049 (±17,462) cm³ to 25,993 (±16,251) cm³ per tree. The stand receiving the thinning treatment with the lowest residual stocking produced significantly more volume (P = 0.002) after defoliation than the other treatments.

Keywords

Wood Volume Increment; Low Thinning; Gypsy Moth; Oaks

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	C. B. Davidson, K. W. Gottschalk and J. E. Johnson, “Tree Mortality Following Defoliation by the European Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar L.) in the United States: A Review,” Forest Science, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1999, pp. 74-84.
[2]	T. Tigner, “Gypsy Moth Impact on Virginia’s Hardwood Forests and Forest Industry,” Virginia Department of Forestry, Charlottesville, 1992.
[3]	K. W. Gottschalk, “Silvicultural Guidelines for Forest Stands Threatened by the Gypsy Moth,” Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-171. Radnor, PA: USDA Forest Service, NE Forest Exp. Sta., 1993, p. 49.
[4]	P. M. Wargo and D. R. Houston, “Infection of Defoliated Sugar Maple Trees by Armillaria Mellea,” Phytopathology, Vol. 64, 1974, pp. 817-822. doi:10.1094/Phyto-64-817
[5]	D. M. Dunbar and G. R. Stephens, “Association of Two-Lined Chestnut Borer and Shoestring Fungus with Mortality of Defoliated Oaks in Connecticut,” Forest Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1975, pp. 169-174.
[6]	R. W. Campbell and R. J. Sloan, “Forest Stand Responses to Defoliation by the Gypsy Moth,” Forest Science, Monograph 19, 1977.
[7]	D. R. Houston, “Oak Decline and Mortality,” In: C. C. Doane and M. L. McManus, Eds., The Gypsy Moth: Research toward Integrated Pest Management, USDA Forest Service, Science and Education Agency, Technical Bulletin, No. 1584, 1981, pp. 217-219.
[8]	J. Parker, “Effects of Defoliation on Red Oak Chemistry,” In: C. C. Doane and M. L. McManus, Eds., The Gypsy Moth: Research toward Integrated Pest Management, USDA Forest Service, Science and Education Agency, Technical Bulletin, No. 1584, 1981, pp. 219-225.
[9]	P. M. Wargo, “Defoliation and Tree Growth,” In: C. C. Doane and M. L. McManus, Eds., The Gypsy Moth: Research toward Integrated Pest Management, USDA Forest Service, Science and Education Agency, Technical Bulletin, No. 1584, 1981, pp. 225-240.
[10]	C. B. Davidson, K. W. Gottschalk and J. E. Johnson, “European Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar L.) Outbreaks: A Review of the Literature,” Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-278, Newtown Square, PA: USDA, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, 2001.
[11]	F.M. Thomas, R. Blank and G. Hartman, “Abiotic and Biotic Factors and Their Interactions as Causes of Oak Decline in Central Europe,” Forest Pathology, Vol. 32, No. 4-5, 2002, pp. 277-307. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0329.2002.00291.x
[12]	R. Rogers and T. M. Hinckley, “Foliar Weight and Area Related to Current Sapwood Area in Oak,” Forest Science, Vol. 25, 1979, pp. 298-303.
[13]	R. L. Phipps, “Comments on Interpretation of Climatic Information from Tree Rings, Eastern North America,” Tree-Ring Bulletin, Vol. 42, 1982, pp. 11-21.
[14]	D. W. Woodcock, “Climate Sensitivity of Wood-Anatomical Features in Ring-Porous Oak (Quercus Macrocarpa),” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 19, No. 5, 1989, pp. 639-644. doi:10.1139/x89-100
[15]	G. C. Varley and G. R. Gradwell, “Population Models for the Winter Moth,” In: T. R. E. Southwood Ed., Insect Abundance, Symposium, Royal Entomological Society, London, 1968, pp.132-142.
[16]	A. H. Rose, “The Effect of Defoliation on Foliage Production and Radial Growth of Quaking Aspen,” Forest Science, Vol. 4, 1958, pp. 335-342.
[17]	H. M. Kulman, “Effects of Insect Defoliation on Growth and Mortality of Trees,” Annual Review Entomology, Vol. 16, 1971, pp. 289-324. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.16.010171.001445
[18]	G. R. Stephens, N. C. Turner and H. C. DeRoo, “Some Effects of Defoliation by Gypsy Moth (Porthetria dispar L.) and Elm Spanworm (Ennomos subsignarius Hbn.) on Water Balance and Growth of Deciduous Forest Trees,” Forest Science, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1972, pp. 326-330.
[19]	R. M. Muzika and A. M. Liebhold, “Changes in Radial Increment of Host and Nonhost Tree Species with Gypsy Moth Defoliation,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 29, No. 9, 1999, pp. 1365-1373. doi:10.1139/x99-098
[20]	R. Naidoo and M. J. Lechowicz., “Effects of Gypsy Moth on Radial Growth of Deciduous Trees,” Forest Science, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2001, pp. 338-348.
[21]	D. A. Gansner and O. W. Herrick, “Estimating the Benefits of Gypsy Moth Control on Timberland,” USDA Forest Service Res. Note NE-337, 1987, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, p. 3.
[22]	C. W. Minott and I. T. Guild, “Some Results of the Defoliation of Trees,” Journal of Economic Entomology, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1925, pp. 345-348.
[23]	W. L. Baker, “Effect of Gypsy Moth Defoliation on Certain Trees,” Journal of Forestry, Vol. 39, No. 12, 1941, pp. 1017-1022.
[24]	S. Kucherov, “The Reconstruction of Lymantria dispar Outbreaks by Dendrochronological Methods in the South Urals,” In: Y. N. Baranchikov, W. J. Mattson, F. P. Hain and L. Thomas, Eds., Forest Insect Guilds: Patterns of Interaction with Host Trees, Abakan, Siberia, 1989 August 13-17.
[25]	F. Huber, “Determinisme de la Surface des Vaisseaux du Bois des Chenes Indigenes (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea Liebl.): Effet Individuel, Effet de l’Appareil Foliaire, des Conditions Climatiques et de l’Age de l’Arbre,” Annals of Forest Science, Vol. 50, No. 5, 1993, pp. 509-524. doi:10.1051/forest:19930507
[26]	A. Fratzian, “Growth and Vitality of Oak Stands after Being Eaten by Gypsy Moths, Lymantria dispar L., in Romania,” Anz. Schaedlingskd., Pflanz. Unweltschutz Vol. 46, 1973, pp. 122-125.
[27]	A. Magnober and A. Cambini, “Radial Growth of Cork Oak and the Effects of Defoliation Caused by Larvae of Lymantria dispar L. and Malacosoma neustria L. [Portu-guese],” Boletin do Instituto dos Produtos Florestals, No. 413, 1973, pp. 53-59.
[28]	M. J. Twery, “Changes in the Vertical Distribution of Xylem Production in Hardwoods Defoliated by Gypsy Moth,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, 1987.
[29]	M. A. Fajvan, J. S. Rentch and K. W. Gottschalk, “The Effects of Thinning and Gypsy Moth Defoliation on Wood Volume Growth in Oaks,” Trees, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2008, pp. 257-268. doi:10.1007/s00468-007-0183-6
[30]	R. Kienholz, “Seasonal Course of Height Growth in Some Hardwoods in Connecticut,” Ecology, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1941, pp. 249-258. doi:10.2307/1929612
[31]	M. H. Zimmerman and C. L. Brown, “Trees: Structure and Function,” Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974
[32]	P. M. Wargo, “Variation of Starch Content among and within Roots of Red and White Oak Trees,” Forest Science, Vol. 22, 1975, pp. 468-471.
[33]	P. M. Wargo, “Consequences of Environmental Stress on Oak: Predisposition to Pathogens,” Annals of Forest Science, Vol. 53, No. 2-3, 1996, pp. 359-368. doi:10.1051/forest:19960218
[34]	P. R. Larson, “Some Indirect Effects of Environment on Wood Formation,” In: M. H. Zimmerman, Ed., Formation of Wood in Forest Trees, Academic Press, New York, 1964.
[35]	S. F. Gingrich, “Measuring and Evaluating Stocking and Stand Density in Upland Hardwood Forests in the Central States,” Forest Science, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1967, pp. 38-53.
[36]	D. M. Smith, B. C. Larson, M. J. Kelty and P. M. S. Ashton, “The Practice of Silviculture Applied Forest Ecology,” 9th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1997.
[37]	M. L. McManus, “In the Beginning: Gypsy Moth in the United States,” In: P. C. Tobin and L. M Blackburn Eds. “Slow the Spread: A National Program to Manage the Gypsy Moth,” USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-6. Newtown Square, PA, 2007, pp. 3-13.
[38]	VoorTech Consulting. Measure J2X R. VoorTech Consulting, Northwood, 2000.
[39]	H. D. Grissino-Mayer, R. L. Holmes and H. C. Fritts, “The International Tree-Ring Data Bank Program Library Version 2.1 User’s Manual,” Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, 1997.
[40]	SAS Institute Inc., “SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide,” SAS Institute Inc., Cary, 2004.
[41]	G. W. Miller, J. W. Stringer and D. C. Mercker, “Technical Guide to Crop Tree Release in Hardwood Forests,” Professional Forestry Note, University of Tennessee, 2007. http://www.sref.info/publications/online_pubs
[42]	T. T. Kozlowski, “Growth and Development of Trees,” Academic Press, New York, 1971.
[43]	D. L. Graney, “Ten-Year Growth of Red and White Oak Crop Trees Following Thinning and Fertilization in the Boston Mountains of Arkansas,” Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Southern Silvicultural research Conference, Atlanta, 4-6 November 1986.
[44]	J. S. Rentch, D. Fekedulegn and G. W. Miller, “Climate, Canopy Disturbance, and Radial Growth Averaging in a Second-Growth Mixed-Oak Forest in West Virginia, USA,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2002, pp. 915-927. doi:10.1139/x02-016
[45]	P. Nola, “Climatic Signal in Earlywood and Latewood of Deciduous Oaks from Northern Italy,” In: J. S. Dean, D. M. Meko and T. W. Swetnam, Eds. Tree Rings, Environment and Humanity, University of Arizona, Tucson, 1996, pp. 249-258.
[46]	J. C. Tardiff, “Earlywood, Latewood and Total Ring Width of Ring-Porous Species (Fraxinus nigra Marsh) in Relation to Climatic and Hydrologic Factors,” In: J. S. Dean, D. M. Meko and T. W. Swetnam, Eds., Tree Rings, Environment and Humanity, University of Arizona, Tucson, 1996, pp. 315-324.
[47]	J. C. Tardiff and F. Conciatori, “Influence of Climate on Tree Rings and Vessel Features in Red Oak and White Oak Growing Near Their Northern Distribution Limit, Southwestern Quebec, Canada,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 36, No. 9, 2006, pp. 2317-2330. doi:10.1139/x06-133
[48]	P. Fonti and I. Garcia-Gonzalez, “Suitability of Chestnut Early Wood Vessel Chronologies for Ecological Studies,” New Phytologist, Vol. 163, No. 1, 2004, pp. 77-86. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01089.x
[49]	A. P. Schniewind, “Transverse Anisotropy of Wood: A Function of Gross Anatomic Structure,” Journal Forest Products Research Society, Vol. 9, 1959, pp. 350-359.