[1]
|
L. Onsager, “Crystal Statistics. I. A Two-Dimensional Model with an Order-Disorder Transition,” Physical Review, Vol. 65, No. 3-4, 1944, pp. 117-149.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.65.117
|
[2]
|
R. J. Baxter, “Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics,” Academic Press, London, 1982.
|
[3]
|
E. Callen and D. Shapero, “A Theory of Social Imitation,” Physics Today, Vol. 27, No. 7, 1974, 23 Pages.
doi:10.1063/1.3128690
|
[4]
|
S. Galam, Y. Gefen and Y. Shapir, “Sociophysics: A Mean Behavior Model for the Process of Strike,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 9, 1982.
doi:10.1080/0022250X.1982.9989929
|
[5]
|
B. Latané, “The Psychology of Social Impact,” American Psychologist, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1981, pp. 343-356.
|
[6]
|
T. M. Liggett, “Interacting Particles Systems,” Springer, New York, 1985. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8542-4
|
[7]
|
T. C. Schelling, “Dynamic Models of Segregation,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1971, pp. 143-186. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794
|
[8]
|
D. Stauffer, S. Moss de Oliveira, P. M. C. de Oliveira and J. S. Sá Martins, “Biology, Sociology, Geology by Computational Physicists,” Elsevier Amsterdam, 2006.
|
[9]
|
H. F?llmer, “Random Economies with Many Interacting Agents,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 1, 1974, p. 51. doi:10.1016/0304-4068(74)90035-4
|
[10]
|
K. Bloomquist, “A Comparison of Agent-Based Models of Income Tax Evasion,” Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2006, pp. 411-425.
doi:10.1177/0894439306287021
|
[11]
|
J. Andreoni, B. Erard and J. Feinstein, “Tax Compliance,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1998, pp. 818-860.
|
[12]
|
L. Lederman, “Interplay between Norms and Enforcement in Tax Compliance,” Public Law Research Paper No. 50, 2003.
|
[13]
|
J. Slemrod, “Cheating Ourselves: The Economics of Tax Evasion,” Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2007, pp. 25-48. doi:10.1257/jep.21.1.25
|
[14]
|
S. G?chter, “Moral Judgments in Social Dilemmas: How Bad is Free Riding?” Discussion Papers 2006-03 CeDEx, University of Nottingham, 2006.
|
[15]
|
B. S. Frey and B. Togler, “Managing Motivation, Organization and Governance,” IEW-Working papers 286 Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, 2006.
|
[16]
|
G. Zaklan, F. W. S. Lima and F. Westerhoff, “Controlling Tax Evasion Fluctuations,” Physica A, Vol. 387, No. 23, 2008, pp. 5857-5861. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.06.036
|
[17]
|
G. Grinstein, C. Jayaprakash and Y. He, “Statistical Mechanics of Probabilistic Cellular Automat,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 55, No. 23, 1985, pp. 2527-2530.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2527
|
[18]
|
J. S. Wang and J. L. Lebowitz, “Phase Transitions and Universality in Nonequilibrium Steady States of Stochas- tic Ising Models,” Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 51, No. 5-6, 1988, pp. 893-906. doi:10.1007/BF01014891
|
[19]
|
M. C. Marques, “Nonequilibrium Ising Model with Competing Dynamics: A MFRG Approach,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 145, No. 6-7, 1990, pp. 379-382.
doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90954-M
|
[20]
|
M. J. Oliveira, “Isotropic Majority-Vote Model on a Square Lattice,” Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 66, No. 1, 1992, pp. 273-281. doi:10.1007/BF01060069
|
[21]
|
F. W. S. Lima, “Majority-Vote Model on (3, 4, 6, 4) and (34, 6) Archimedean Lattices,” International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), Vol. 17, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1273-1283. doi:10.1142/S0129183106009849
|
[22]
|
M. A. Santos and S. J. Teixeira, “Universality Classes in Nonequilibrium Lattice Systems,” Statistical Physics, Vol. 78, 1995, p. 963. doi:10.1007/BF02183696
|
[23]
|
F. W. S. Lima, U. L. Fulco and R. N. Costa Filho, “Majority-Vote Model on a Random Lattice,” Physical Review E, Vol. 71, No. 3, 2005, Article ID 036105.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036105
|
[24]
|
M. E. J. Newman, S. H. Strogatz and D. J. Watts, “Random Graphs with Arbitrary Degree Distributions and Their Applications,” Physical Review E, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2001, Article ID 026118.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.026118
|
[25]
|
A. D. Sanchez, J. M. Lopez and M. A. Rodriguez, “Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in Directed Small-World Networks,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 88, No. 4, 2002, Article ID 048701.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.048701
|
[26]
|
G. Palla, I. J. Farkas, P. Pollner, I. Derenyi and T. Vicsek, “Directed Network Modules,” New Journal of Physics, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2007, pp. 186-207.
doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/186
|
[27]
|
A.-L. Barab′asi and R. Albert, “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks,” Science, Vol. 286, No. 5439, 1999, pp. 509-512. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509
|
[28]
|
A. Aleksiejuk, J. A. Ho lyst and D. Stauffer, “Ferromagnetic Phase Transition in Barabasi-Albert Networks,” Physica A, Vol. 310, No. 1-2, 2002, pp. 260-266.
doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00740-9
|
[29]
|
M. A. Sumour and M. M. Shabat, “Monte Carlo Simulation of Ising. Model on Directed Barabasi-Albert Network,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2005, pp. 585-589.
doi:10.1142/S0129183105007352
|
[30]
|
M. A. Sumour and M. M. Shabat and D. Stauffer, “Absence of Ferromagnetism in Ising Model on Directed Barabasi-Albert Network,” Islamic University Journal (Gaza), Vol. 14, 2006, p. 209.
|
[31]
|
P. Erd¨os and A. R′enyi, “Graphy Theory and Probability,” Canadian Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 6, 1959, p. 290.
|
[32]
|
D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, “Collective Dynamics of small-World Networks,” Nature, Vol. 393, 6684, 1998, pp. 440-442. doi:10.1038/30918
|
[33]
|
S. Wasseman, K. Faust and B. Balob′as, “Social Networks Analysis,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
|
[34]
|
D. Stauffer, M. Hohnisch and S. Pittnauer, “Consensus Formation on Coevolving Networks: Groups’ Formation and Structure,” Physica A, Vol. 370, No. 2, 2006, pp. 734-740. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2006.05.033
|
[35]
|
F. W. S. Lima, “Majority-Vote on Directed Barabasi- Albert Networks,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 17, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1257-1265.
|
[36]
|
F. W. S. Lima, “Ising Model Spin S=1 on Directed Barabási-Albert Networks,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 17, 2006, p. 257.
|
[37]
|
F. W. S. Lima, “Potts Model with q States on Directed Barabasi-Albert Networks,” Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 2, 2007, pp. 522-529.
|
[38]
|
F. W. S. Lima, “Simulation of Majority Rule Disturbed by Power-Law Noise on Directed And Undirected Barabási Albert Networks,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 19, 2008, p. 1063.
doi:10.1142/S0129183108012686
|
[39]
|
F. P. Fernandes and F. W. S. Lima, “ Persistence in the Zero-Temperature Dynamics of the Q-states Potts Model on Undirected-Directed Barabási-Albert Networks and Erd?s-Rènyi Random Graphs,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 19, No. 12, 2008, pp. 1777-1785.
doi:10.1142/S0129183108013345
|
[40]
|
F. W. S. Lima and G. Zaklan, “A Multi-Agent-Based Approach to Tax Morale,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 19, 2008, pp. 1797-1822.
doi:10.1142/S0129183108013357
|
[41]
|
F. W. S. Lima, T. Hadzibeganovic and D. Stauffer, “Evolution of Ethnocentrism on Undirected and Directed Barabási Albert Networks,” Physica A, Vol. 388, No. 24, 2009, pp. 4999-5004. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2009.08.029
|
[42]
|
F. W. S. Lima and D. Stauffer, “Ising Model Simulation in Directed Lattices and Networks,” Physica A, Vol. 359, 2006, pp. 423-429. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2005.05.085
|
[43]
|
P. R. Campos, V. M. Oliveira and F. G. B. Moreira, “Majority-Vote Model on Small World Network,” Physical Review E, Vol. 67, No. 2, 2003, Article ID 026104.
|
[44]
|
F. W. S. Lima, “Majority-Vote on Undirected Barabási- Albert Networks,” Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2007, pp. 358-366.
|
[45]
|
E. M. S. Luz and F. W. S. Lima, “Majority-Vote on Directed Small-World Networks,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 18, 2007, p. 1251.
doi:10.1142/S0129183107011297
|
[46]
|
F. W. S. Lima, A. O. Sousa and M. A. Sumuor, “Majority-Vote Model on Directed Erdos-Renyi Random Graph,” Physica A, Vol. 387-389, 2008, pp. 3503-3511.
doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.01.120
|
[47]
|
S. Galam, “Sociophysics: A Review of Galam Models,” International Journal of General Systems, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1990, pp. 191-209. doi:10.1080/03081079108935145
|
[48]
|
S. Galam, “Social Paradoxes of Majority Rule Voting and Renormalization Group,” Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 61, 1990, pp. 943-951. doi:10.1007/BF01027314
|
[49]
|
L. F. C. Pereira and F. G. B. Moreira, “Majority-Vote Model on Random Graphs,” Physical Review E, Vol. 71, No. 1, 2005, Article ID 016123.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016123
|
[50]
|
S. Galam, B. Chopard, A. Masselot and M. Droz, “Emergence in Multi-Agent Systems Part II: Axtell, Epstein and Young’s Revisited,” European Physical Journal B, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1998, pp. 529-531. doi:10.1007/s100510050410
|
[51]
|
S. Galam, “Collective Be-liefs versus Individual Inflexibility: The Unavoidable Biases of a Public Debate,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, Vol. 390, No. 17, 2005, pp. 3036-3054.
|
[52]
|
S. Gekle, L. Peliti and S. Galam, “Opinion Dynamics in a Three-Choice System,” European Physical Journal B, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2005, pp. 569-575.
doi:10.1140/epjb/e2005-00215-3
|
[53]
|
S. Galam, “Sociophysics: A Review of Galam Models,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2008, pp. 409-440. doi:10.1142/S0129183108012297
|
[54]
|
R. Wintrobe and K. G¨erxhani, “Tax Evasion and Trust: A Comparative Analysis,” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, 2004.
|